Estimating Overdiagnosis in Low-Dose Computed Tomography Screening for Lung Cancer A Cohort Study

被引:148
|
作者
Veronesi, Giulia [1 ]
Maisonneuve, Patrick
Bellomi, Massimo
Rampinelli, Cristiano
Durli, Iara
Bertolotti, Raffaella
Spaggiari, Lorenzo
机构
[1] European Inst Oncol, Div Thorac Surg, I-20141 Milan, Italy
关键词
HIGH-RISK INDIVIDUALS; NATURAL-HISTORY; GROWTH-RATES; CT; STAGE; TRIAL; CARCINOMA; NODULES; DESIGN; MODEL;
D O I
10.7326/0003-4819-157-11-201212040-00005
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Lung cancer screening may detect cancer that will never become symptomatic (overdiagnosis), leading to overtreatment. Changes in size on sequential low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening, expressed as volume-doubling time (VDT), may help to distinguish aggressive cancer from cases that are unlikely to become symptomatic. Objective: To assess VDT for screening-detected lung cancer as an indicator of overdiagnosis. Design: Retrospective estimation of the VDT of cancer detected in a prospective LDCT screening cohort. Setting: Nonrandomized, single-center screening study involving persons at high risk for lung cancer enrolled between 2004 and 2005 who received LDCT annually for 5 years. Patients: 175 study patients diagnosed with primary lung cancer. Measurements: VDT was measured on LDCT and classified as fast-growing (<400 days), slow-growing (between 400 and 599 days), or indolent (>= 600 days). Results: Fifty-five cases of cancer were diagnosed at baseline, and 120 were diagnosed subsequently. Of the latter group, 19 cases (15.8%) were new (not visible on previous scans) and fast-growing (median VDT, 52 days); 101 (84.2%) were progressive, including 70 (58.3%) fast-growing and 31 (25.8%) slow-growing (15.0%) or indolent (10.8%) cases. Lung cancer-specific mortality was significantly higher (9.2% per year) in patients with new compared with slow-growing or indolent (0.9% per year) cancer. Sixty percent of fast-growing progressive cancer and 45% of new cancer were stage I, for which survival was good. Limitations: This is a retrospective study. Volume-doubling time can only indicate overdiagnosis and was estimated for new cancer from 1 measurement (a diameter of 2 mm assumed the previous year). Conclusion: Slow-growing or indolent cancer comprised approximately 25% of incident cases, many of which may have been overdiagnosed. To limit overtreatment in these cases, minimally invasive limited resection and nonsurgical treatments should be investigated.
引用
收藏
页码:776 / +
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Lung cancer screening using low-dose computed tomography in at-risk individuals: The Toronto experience
    Menezes, Ravi J.
    Roberts, Heidi C.
    Paul, Narinder S.
    McGregor, Maureen
    Chung, Tae Bong
    Patsios, Demetris
    Weisbrod, Gordon
    Herman, Stephen
    Pereira, Andre
    McGregor, Alexander
    Dong, Zhi
    Sitartchouk, Igor
    Boerner, Scott
    Tsao, Ming-Sound
    Keshavjee, Shaf
    Shepherd, Frances A.
    LUNG CANCER, 2010, 67 (02) : 177 - 183
  • [32] What is the balance of benefits and harms for lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography?
    Bradley, Stephen H.
    Shinkins, Bethany
    Kennedy, Martyn P. T.
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE, 2021, 114 (04) : 164 - 170
  • [33] Prognostic effect of implementation of the mass low-dose computed tomography lung cancer screening program: a hospital-based cohort study
    Wu, Fu-Zong
    Huang, Yi-Luan
    Wu, Yun-Ju
    Tang, En-Kuei
    Wu, Ming-Ting
    Chen, Chi-Shen
    Lin, Yun-Pei
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2020, 29 (05) : 445 - 451
  • [34] Low-Dose Computed Tomography Screening for Lung Cancer How Strong Is the Evidence?
    Woolf, Steven H.
    Harris, Russell P.
    Campos-Outcalt, Doug
    JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2014, 174 (12) : 2019 - 2022
  • [35] Lung Cancer Field Cancerization: Implications for Screening by Low-Dose Computed Tomography
    Robles, Ana I.
    Harris, Curtis C.
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2017, 109 (07):
  • [36] Screening baseline characteristics of early lung cancer on low-dose computed tomography with computer-aided detection in a Chinese population
    Liu, Yuanyuan
    Luo, Hongbin
    Qing, Haomiao
    Wang, Xiaodong
    Ren, Jing
    Xu, Guohui
    Hu, Shibei
    He, Changjiu
    Zhou, Peng
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2019, 62
  • [37] Estimating the Cost-Effectiveness of Lung Cancer Screening with Low-Dose Computed Tomography for High-Risk Smokers in Australia
    Wade, Stephen
    Weber, Marianne
    Caruana, Michael
    Kang, Yoon-Jung
    Marshall, Henry
    Manser, Renee
    Vinod, Shalini
    Rankin, Nicole
    Fong, Kwun
    Canfell, Karen
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2018, 13 (08) : 1094 - 1105
  • [38] Low-dose computed tomography for lung cancer screening in Anhui, China: A randomized controlled trial
    Rong, Feng
    Shi, Rui
    Hu, Lili
    Chen, Ran
    Wang, Daoyue
    Lv, Xiazhi
    Zhao, Yong
    Huang, Wei
    Yang, Yang
    Zhou, Hongyang
    Hong, Kaige
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [39] Screening with Low-Dose Computed Tomography Does Not Improve Survival of Small Cell Lung Cancer
    Silva, Mario
    Galeone, Carlotta
    Sverzellati, Nicola
    Marchiano, Alfonso
    Calareso, Giuseppina
    Sestini, Stefano
    La Vecchia, Carlo
    Sozzi, Gabriella
    Pelosi, Giuseppe
    Pastorino, Ugo
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2016, 11 (02) : 187 - 193
  • [40] Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Low-Dose Computed Tomographic Screening
    Aberle, Denise R.
    Adams, Amanda M.
    Berg, Christine D.
    Black, William C.
    Clapp, Jonathan D.
    Fagerstrom, Richard M.
    Gareen, Ilana F.
    Gatsonis, Constantine
    Marcus, Pamela M.
    Sicks, JoRean D.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2011, 365 (05) : 395 - 409