Estimating Overdiagnosis in Low-Dose Computed Tomography Screening for Lung Cancer A Cohort Study

被引:153
作者
Veronesi, Giulia [1 ]
Maisonneuve, Patrick
Bellomi, Massimo
Rampinelli, Cristiano
Durli, Iara
Bertolotti, Raffaella
Spaggiari, Lorenzo
机构
[1] European Inst Oncol, Div Thorac Surg, I-20141 Milan, Italy
关键词
HIGH-RISK INDIVIDUALS; NATURAL-HISTORY; GROWTH-RATES; CT; STAGE; TRIAL; CARCINOMA; NODULES; DESIGN; MODEL;
D O I
10.7326/0003-4819-157-11-201212040-00005
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Lung cancer screening may detect cancer that will never become symptomatic (overdiagnosis), leading to overtreatment. Changes in size on sequential low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening, expressed as volume-doubling time (VDT), may help to distinguish aggressive cancer from cases that are unlikely to become symptomatic. Objective: To assess VDT for screening-detected lung cancer as an indicator of overdiagnosis. Design: Retrospective estimation of the VDT of cancer detected in a prospective LDCT screening cohort. Setting: Nonrandomized, single-center screening study involving persons at high risk for lung cancer enrolled between 2004 and 2005 who received LDCT annually for 5 years. Patients: 175 study patients diagnosed with primary lung cancer. Measurements: VDT was measured on LDCT and classified as fast-growing (<400 days), slow-growing (between 400 and 599 days), or indolent (>= 600 days). Results: Fifty-five cases of cancer were diagnosed at baseline, and 120 were diagnosed subsequently. Of the latter group, 19 cases (15.8%) were new (not visible on previous scans) and fast-growing (median VDT, 52 days); 101 (84.2%) were progressive, including 70 (58.3%) fast-growing and 31 (25.8%) slow-growing (15.0%) or indolent (10.8%) cases. Lung cancer-specific mortality was significantly higher (9.2% per year) in patients with new compared with slow-growing or indolent (0.9% per year) cancer. Sixty percent of fast-growing progressive cancer and 45% of new cancer were stage I, for which survival was good. Limitations: This is a retrospective study. Volume-doubling time can only indicate overdiagnosis and was estimated for new cancer from 1 measurement (a diameter of 2 mm assumed the previous year). Conclusion: Slow-growing or indolent cancer comprised approximately 25% of incident cases, many of which may have been overdiagnosed. To limit overtreatment in these cases, minimally invasive limited resection and nonsurgical treatments should be investigated.
引用
收藏
页码:776 / +
页数:12
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Low-Dose Computed Tomographic Screening [J].
Aberle, Denise R. ;
Adams, Amanda M. ;
Berg, Christine D. ;
Black, William C. ;
Clapp, Jonathan D. ;
Fagerstrom, Richard M. ;
Gareen, Ilana F. ;
Gatsonis, Constantine ;
Marcus, Pamela M. ;
Sicks, JoRean D. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2011, 365 (05) :395-409
[2]   Phase II Proof-of-Concept Study of Pazopanib Monotherapy in Treatment-Naive Patients With Stage I/II Resectable Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer [J].
Altorki, Nasser ;
Lane, Maureen E. ;
Bauer, Thomas ;
Lee, Paul C. ;
Guarino, Michael J. ;
Pass, Harvey ;
Felip, Enriqueta ;
Peylan-Ramu, Nili ;
Gurpide, Alfonso ;
Grannis, Frederic W. ;
Mitchell, John D. ;
Tachdjian, Sabrina ;
Swann, R. Suzanne ;
Huff, Anne ;
Roychowdhury, Debasish F. ;
Reeves, Anthony ;
Ottesen, Lone H. ;
Yankelevitz, David F. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 28 (19) :3131-3137
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1985, Cancer, DOI [DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19850801)56:3!, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19850801)56:3ANDLT
[4]  
531::AID-CNCR2820560321ANDGT
[5]  
3.0.CO
[6]  
2-3]
[7]   Is our natural-history model of lung cancer wrong? [J].
Bach, Peter B. .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2008, 9 (07) :693-697
[8]   UK Lung Screen (UKLS) nodule management protocol: modelling of a single screen randomised controlled trial of low-dose CT screening for lung cancer [J].
Baldwin, D. R. ;
Duffy, S. W. ;
Wald, N. J. ;
Page, R. ;
Hansell, D. M. ;
Field, J. K. .
THORAX, 2011, 66 (04) :308-313
[9]   Classification, staging and prognosis of lung cancer [J].
Beadsmoore, CJ ;
Screaton, NJ .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2003, 45 (01) :8-17
[10]  
Berland Lincoln L, 2009, J Am Coll Radiol, V6, P14, DOI 10.1016/j.jacr.2008.06.018