Automated image quality evaluation of T2-weighted liver MRI utilizing deep learning architecture

被引:67
作者
Esses, Steven J. [1 ]
Lu, Xiaoguang [2 ]
Zhao, Tiejun [2 ]
Shanbhogue, Krishna [1 ]
Dane, Bari [1 ]
Bruno, Mary [1 ]
Chandarana, Hersh [1 ]
机构
[1] NYU, Dept Radiol, Ctr Biomed Imaging, Sch Med, 560 1St Ave, New York, NY 10016 USA
[2] Siemens Healthineers, New York, NY USA
关键词
machine learning; deep learning; convolutional neuronal network; liver MRI; T2 weighted imaging; image quality; TECHNIQUE IMPACT; SEQUENCES;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.25779
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PurposeTo develop and test a deep learning approach named Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) for automated screening of T-2-weighted (T2WI) liver acquisitions for nondiagnostic images, and compare this automated approach to evaluation by two radiologists. Materials and MethodsWe evaluated 522 liver magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) exams performed at 1.5T and 3T at our institution between November 2014 and May 2016 for CNN training and validation. The CNN consisted of an input layer, convolutional layer, fully connected layer, and output layer. 351T(2)WI were anonymized for training. Each case was annotated with a label of being diagnostic or nondiagnostic for detecting lesions and assessing liver morphology. Another independently collected 171 cases were sequestered for a blind test. These 171T(2)WI were assessed independently by two radiologists and annotated as being diagnostic or nondiagnostic. These 171T(2)WI were presented to the CNN algorithm and image quality (IQ) output of the algorithm was compared to that of two radiologists. ResultsThere was concordance in IQ label between Reader 1 and CNN in 79% of cases and between Reader 2 and CNN in 73%. The sensitivity and the specificity of the CNN algorithm in identifying nondiagnostic IQ was 67% and 81% with respect to Reader 1 and 47% and 80% with respect to Reader 2. The negative predictive value of the algorithm for identifying nondiagnostic IQ was 94% and 86% (relative to Readers 1 and 2). ConclusionWe demonstrate a CNN algorithm that yields a high negative predictive value when screening for nondiagnostic T2WI of the liver. Level of Evidence: 2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018;47:723-728.
引用
收藏
页码:723 / 728
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] Bishop C. M., 2006, PATTERN RECOGN, V4, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-45528-0
  • [2] Abdominal applications of 3.0-T MR imaging: Comparative review versus a 1.5-T system
    Choi, Jin-Young
    Kim, Myeong-Jin
    Chung, Yong Eun
    Kim, Ki Youn
    Jones, Alun C.
    de Becker, Jan
    van Cauteren, Marc
    [J]. RADIOGRAPHICS, 2008, 28 (04) : e30
  • [3] Danrad Raman, 2005, Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am, V13, P277, DOI 10.1016/j.mric.2005.03.006
  • [4] Fully-automated quality assurance in multi-center studies using MRI phantom measurements
    Davids, Mathias
    Zoellner, Frank G.
    Ruttorf, Michaela
    Nees, Frauke
    Flor, Herta
    Schumann, Gunter
    Schad, Lothar R.
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2014, 32 (06) : 771 - 780
  • [5] Machine learning approaches in medical image analysis: From detection to diagnosis
    de Bruijne, Marleen
    [J]. MEDICAL IMAGE ANALYSIS, 2016, 33 : 94 - 97
  • [6] Compressed sensing for body MRI
    Feng, Li
    Benkert, Thomas
    Block, Kai Tobias
    Sodickson, Daniel K.
    Otazo, Ricardo
    Chandarana, Hersh
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2017, 45 (04) : 966 - 987
  • [7] Quiet MR sequences in clinical routine: initial experience in abdominal imaging
    Fischer, Sebastian
    Grodzki, David M.
    Domschke, Markus
    Albrecht, Moritz
    Bodelle, Boris
    Eichler, Katrin
    Hammerstingl, Renate
    Vogl, Thomas J.
    Zangos, Stephan
    [J]. RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2017, 122 (03): : 194 - 203
  • [8] Goodfellow I, 2016, ADAPT COMPUT MACH LE, P1
  • [9] Hepatocellular carcinoma in the cirrhotic liver: Gadolinium-enhanced 3D T1-weighted MR imaging as a stand-alone sequence for diagnosis
    Hecht, EM
    Holland, AE
    Israel, GM
    Hahn, WY
    Kim, DC
    West, AB
    Babb, JS
    Taouli, B
    Lee, VS
    Krinsky, GA
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2006, 239 (02) : 438 - 447
  • [10] MRI quality control:: six imagers studied using eleven unified image quality parameters
    Ihalainen, T
    Sipilä, O
    Savolainen, S
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2004, 14 (10) : 1859 - 1865