Digital rock physics benchmarks-part II: Computing effective properties

被引:425
作者
Andrae, Heiko
Combaret, Nicolas
Dvorkin, Jack [1 ]
Glatt, Erik
Han, Junehee [2 ]
Kabel, Matthias
Keehm, Youngseuk [2 ]
Krzikalla, Fabian [1 ]
Lee, Minhui [2 ]
Madonna, Claudio [3 ]
Marsh, Mike
Mukerji, Tapan [1 ]
Saenger, Erik H. [3 ]
Sain, Ratnanabha
Saxena, Nishank [1 ]
Ricker, Sarah
Wiegmann, Andreas
Zhan, Xin
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Kongju Univ, Kong Ju, South Korea
[3] ETH, Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
Digital rock; Effective physical properties; Numerical upscaling; Sandstone; Carbonate; Sphere pack; EFFECTIVE ELASTIC PROPERTIES; DISCRETIZED BOLTZMANN-EQUATION; FINITE-ELEMENT SIMULATIONS; LATTICE-BOLTZMANN; POROUS MATERIALS; FONTAINEBLEAU SANDSTONE; PARTICULATE SUSPENSIONS; NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS; FLUID-FLOW; POROSITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.cageo.2012.09.008
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
This is the second and final part of our digital rock physics (DRP) benchmarking study. We use segmented 3-D images (one for Fontainebleau, three for Berea, three for a carbonate, and one for a sphere pack) to directly compute the absolute permeability, the electrical resistivity, and elastic moduli. The numerical methods tested include a finite-element solver (elastic moduli and electrical conductivity), two finite-difference solvers (elastic moduli and electrical conductivity), a Fourier-based Lippmann-Schwinger solver (elastic moduli), a lattice-Boltzmann solver (hydraulic permeability), and the explicit-jump method (hydraulic permeability and electrical conductivity). The set-ups for these numerical experiments, including the boundary conditions and the total model size, varied as well. The results thus produced vary from each other. For example, the highest computed permeability value may differ from the lowest one by a factor of 1.5. Nevertheless, all these results fall within the ranges consistent with the relevant laboratory data. Our analysis provides the DRP community with a range of possible outcomes which can be expected depending on the solver and its setup. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 43
页数:11
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1998, 6269 NAT I STAND TEC
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2007, Numerical Recipes
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Cellular Automata Modeling of Physical Systems
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1997, Lattice-gas cellular automata: Simple models of complex hydrodynamics
[5]   Computation of linear elastic properties from microtomographic images: Methodology and agreement between theory and experiment [J].
Arns, CH ;
Knackstedt, MA ;
Pinczewski, WV ;
Garboczi, EJ .
GEOPHYSICS, 2002, 67 (05) :1396-1405
[6]   HYDRAULIC AND ACOUSTIC PROPERTIES AS A FUNCTION OF POROSITY IN FONTAINEBLEAU SANDSTONE [J].
BOURBIE, T ;
ZINSZNER, B .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH AND PLANETS, 1985, 90 (NB13) :1524-1532
[7]   THE PERMEABILITY OF A RANDOM MEDIUM - COMPARISON OF SIMULATION WITH THEORY [J].
CANCELLIERE, A ;
CHANG, C ;
FOTI, E ;
ROTHMAN, DH ;
SUCCI, S .
PHYSICS OF FLUIDS A-FLUID DYNAMICS, 1990, 2 (12) :2085-2088
[8]  
Doolen G, 2019, Lattice gas methods for partial differential equations
[9]   Elasticity of high-porosity sandstones: Theory for two North Sea data sets [J].
Dvorkin, J ;
Nur, A .
GEOPHYSICS, 1996, 61 (05) :1363-1370
[10]  
Dvorkin J, 2011, GEOPHYSICS, V76, pE141, DOI [10.1190/geo2010-0352.1, 10.1190/GEO2010-0352.1]