Apraxia of Speech and Phonological Errors in the Diagnosis of Nonfluent/Agrammatic and Logopenic Variants of Primary Progressive Aphasia

被引:76
|
作者
Croot, Karen [1 ,2 ]
Ballard, Kirrie [1 ]
Leyton, Cristian E. [3 ,4 ]
Hodges, John R. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[2] Macquarie Univ, ARC Ctr Excellence Cognit & Its Disorders, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia
[3] Neurosci Res Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ New S Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
来源
JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH | 2012年 / 55卷 / 05期
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会; 英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
speech production; nonfluent progressive aphasia; apraxia of speech; phonological errors; frontotemporal dementia; Alzheimer's disease; brain imaging; ALZHEIMERS-DISEASE; NONFLUENT APHASIA; COGNITION; BETA;
D O I
10.1044/1092-4388(2012/11-0323)
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Purpose: The International Consensus Criteria for the diagnosis of primary progressive aphasia (PPA; Gorno-Tempini et al., 2011) propose apraxia of speech (AOS) as 1 of 2 core features of nonfluent/agrammatic PPA and propose phonological errors or absence of motor speech disorder as features of logopenic PPA. We investigated the sensitivity and specificity of AOS and phonological errors as markers for these variants and also investigated the relationship between AOS, phonological errors, and findings on C-labeled Pittsburgh Compound B (PiB)-positron emission tomography (PET) imaging associated with putative Alzheimer-type pathology. Method: Connected speech and word repetition in 23 people with PPA who underwent PiB-PET imaging were rated for apraxic versus phonological disruption by 1 rater who was blind to diagnosis and by 2 raters who were blind to PiB-PET results. Results: Apraxic characteristics had high sensitivity for nonfluent/agrammatic PPA, and phonological errors had high sensitivity for logopenic PPA; however, phonological errors showed lower specificity for logopenic PPA. On PiB imaging, 8 of 9 people with predominant AOS returned negative results, whereas participants with no or questionable AOS with and without phonological errors returned positive results. Conclusions: Attention to AOS and phonological errors may help counter some of the inherent limitations of diagnosis-by-exclusion in the current International Consensus Criteria for diagnosing PPA.
引用
收藏
页码:S1562 / S1572
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Ideomotor apraxia in agrammatic and logopenic variants of primary progressive aphasia
    Adeli, Anahita
    Whitwell, Jennifer L.
    Duffy, Joseph R.
    Strand, Edyth A.
    Josephs, Keith A.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2013, 260 (06) : 1594 - 1600
  • [2] Ideomotor Apraxia in Agrammatic and Logopenic Variants of Primary Progressive Aphasia
    Adeli, Anahita
    Duffy, J. R.
    Strand, E. A.
    Josephs, K. A.
    DEMENTIA AND GERIATRIC COGNITIVE DISORDERS, 2012, 33 : 235 - 236
  • [3] Ideomotor apraxia in agrammatic and logopenic variants of primary progressive aphasia
    Anahita Adeli
    Jennifer L. Whitwell
    Joseph R. Duffy
    Edyth A. Strand
    Keith A. Josephs
    Journal of Neurology, 2013, 260 : 1594 - 1600
  • [4] Apraxia of Speech in the Spontaneous Speech of Nonfluent/Agrammatic Primary Progressive Aphasia
    Ash, Sharon
    Nevler, Naomi
    Shellikeri, Sanjana
    Rascovsky, Katya
    Shaw, Leslie
    Lee, Edward B.
    Trojanowsk, John Q.
    Grossman, Murray
    JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE REPORTS, 2023, 7 (01) : 589 - 604
  • [5] Speech Metrics and Samples That Differentiate Between Nonfluent/Agrammatic and Logopenic Variants of Primary Progressive Aphasia
    Haley, Katarina L.
    Jacks, Adam
    Jarrett, Jordan
    Ray, Taylor
    Cunningham, Kevin T.
    Gorno-Tempini, Maria Luisa
    Henry, Maya L.
    JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2021, 64 (03): : 754 - 775
  • [6] The New Classification of Primary Progressive Aphasia into Semantic, Logopenic, or Nonfluent/Agrammatic Variants
    Michael F. Bonner
    Sharon Ash
    Murray Grossman
    Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports, 2010, 10 : 484 - 490
  • [7] The New Classification of Primary Progressive Aphasia into Semantic, Logopenic, or Nonfluent/Agrammatic Variants
    Bonner, Michael F.
    Ash, Sharon
    Grossman, Murray
    CURRENT NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSCIENCE REPORTS, 2010, 10 (06) : 484 - 490
  • [8] Motor speech disorders in the nonfluent, semantic and logopenic variants of primary progressive aphasia
    Staiger, Anja
    Schroeter, Matthias L.
    Ziegler, Wolfram
    Schoelderle, Theresa
    Anderl-Straub, Sarah
    Danek, Adrian
    Duning, Thomas
    Fassbender, Klaus
    Fliessbach, Klaus
    Jahn, Holger
    Kasper, Elisabeth
    Kornhuber, Johannes
    Landwehrmeyer, Bernhard
    Lauer, Martin
    Lombardi, Jolina
    Ludolph, Albert
    Mueller-Sarnowski, Felix
    Polyakova, Maryna
    Prix, Catharina
    Prudlo, Johannes
    Regenbrecht, Frank
    Rossmeier, Carola
    Schneider, Anja
    Wiltfang, Jens
    Otto, Markus
    Diehl-Schmid, Janine
    CORTEX, 2021, 140 : 66 - 79
  • [9] Parkinsonism in the Agrammatic and Logopenic Variants of Primary Progressive Aphasia
    Graff-Radford, Jonathan
    Duffy, Joseph
    Strand, Edythe
    Josephs, Keith
    NEUROLOGY, 2012, 78
  • [10] Logopenic and Nonfluent Variants of Primary Progressive Aphasia Are Differentiated by Acoustic Measures of Speech Production
    Ballard, Kirrie J.
    Savage, Sharon
    Leyton, Cristian E.
    Vogel, Adam P.
    Hornberger, Michael
    Hodges, John R.
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (02):