Apraxia of Speech and Phonological Errors in the Diagnosis of Nonfluent/Agrammatic and Logopenic Variants of Primary Progressive Aphasia

被引:77
作者
Croot, Karen [1 ,2 ]
Ballard, Kirrie [1 ]
Leyton, Cristian E. [3 ,4 ]
Hodges, John R. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[2] Macquarie Univ, ARC Ctr Excellence Cognit & Its Disorders, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia
[3] Neurosci Res Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ New S Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
来源
JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH | 2012年 / 55卷 / 05期
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会; 英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
speech production; nonfluent progressive aphasia; apraxia of speech; phonological errors; frontotemporal dementia; Alzheimer's disease; brain imaging; ALZHEIMERS-DISEASE; NONFLUENT APHASIA; COGNITION; BETA;
D O I
10.1044/1092-4388(2012/11-0323)
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Purpose: The International Consensus Criteria for the diagnosis of primary progressive aphasia (PPA; Gorno-Tempini et al., 2011) propose apraxia of speech (AOS) as 1 of 2 core features of nonfluent/agrammatic PPA and propose phonological errors or absence of motor speech disorder as features of logopenic PPA. We investigated the sensitivity and specificity of AOS and phonological errors as markers for these variants and also investigated the relationship between AOS, phonological errors, and findings on C-labeled Pittsburgh Compound B (PiB)-positron emission tomography (PET) imaging associated with putative Alzheimer-type pathology. Method: Connected speech and word repetition in 23 people with PPA who underwent PiB-PET imaging were rated for apraxic versus phonological disruption by 1 rater who was blind to diagnosis and by 2 raters who were blind to PiB-PET results. Results: Apraxic characteristics had high sensitivity for nonfluent/agrammatic PPA, and phonological errors had high sensitivity for logopenic PPA; however, phonological errors showed lower specificity for logopenic PPA. On PiB imaging, 8 of 9 people with predominant AOS returned negative results, whereas participants with no or questionable AOS with and without phonological errors returned positive results. Conclusions: Attention to AOS and phonological errors may help counter some of the inherent limitations of diagnosis-by-exclusion in the current International Consensus Criteria for diagnosing PPA.
引用
收藏
页码:S1562 / S1572
页数:11
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], PROCEDIA SOCIAL BEHA, DOI 10.101016/j.sbspro.2011.09.249
[2]   Speech errors in progressive non-fluent aphasia [J].
Ash, Sharon ;
McMillan, Corey ;
Gunawardena, Delani ;
Avants, Brian ;
Morgan, Brianna ;
Khan, Alea ;
Moore, Peachie ;
Gee, James ;
Grossman, Murray .
BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 2010, 113 (01) :13-20
[3]   IMPAIRMENTS OF SPEECH PRODUCTION AND SPEECH-PERCEPTION IN APHASIA [J].
BLUMSTEIN, SE .
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1994, 346 (1315) :29-36
[4]   PHONEMIC FALSE EVALUATION - THEORETICAL AND CLINICAL ASPECTS [J].
BUCKINGHAM, HW ;
YULE, G .
CLINICAL LINGUISTICS & PHONETICS, 1987, 1 (02) :113-125
[5]   Single word production in nonfluent progressive aphasia [J].
Croot, K ;
Patterson, K ;
Hodges, JR .
BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 1998, 61 (02) :226-273
[6]   Phonological and articulatory impairment in Alzheimer's disease: A case series [J].
Croot, K ;
Hodges, JR ;
Xuereb, J ;
Patterson, K .
BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 2000, 75 (02) :277-309
[7]  
Croot Karen, 2002, Seminars in Speech and Language, V23, P267, DOI 10.1055/s-2002-35800
[8]  
Dickson DW, 1999, J NEUROL, V246, P6
[9]   Apraxia of speech in degenerative neurologic disease [J].
Duffy, Joseph R. .
APHASIOLOGY, 2006, 20 (06) :511-527
[10]   The Diagnosis and Understanding of Apraxia of Speech: Why Including Neurodegenerative Etiologies May Be Important [J].
Duffy, Joseph R. ;
Josephs, Keith A. .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2012, 55 (05) :S1518-S1522