Localized Gastric Cancer Treated with Chemoradation without Surgery: UTMD Anderson Cancer Center Experience

被引:9
作者
Suzuki, Akihiro [1 ]
Xiao, Lianchun [2 ]
Taketa, Takashi [1 ]
Blum, Mariela A. [1 ]
Matamoros, Aurelio, Jr. [3 ]
Chien, Pamela L. [1 ]
Mansfield, Paul F. [5 ]
Fournier, Keith F. [5 ]
Weston, Brian [7 ]
Lee, Jeffrey H. [7 ]
Bhutani, Manoop S. [7 ]
Estrella, Jeannelyn S. [6 ]
Delclos, Marc E. [4 ]
Krishnan, Sunil [4 ]
Das, Prajnan [4 ]
Ajani, Jaffer A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Gastrointestinal Med Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Biostat, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[4] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[5] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Surg Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[6] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Pathol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[7] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol Hepatol & Nutr, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
Gastric cancer; Definitive radiation; Prognosis; Surgery; DEFINITIVE CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; GASTROESOPHAGEAL JUNCTION; PATHOLOGICAL RESPONSE; ADENOCARCINOMA; CARCINOMA; TRIAL; CHEMORADIATION; CHEMOTHERAPY; ESOPHAGEAL; RECURRENCE;
D O I
10.1159/000338318
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: In patients with localized gastric cancer (LGC) who are unfit for surgery, decline surgery, or have unresectable cancer, chemoradiotherapy may provide palliation; however, data in the literature are sparse. Methods: We identified 66 LGC patients who had definitive chemoradiation but no surgery. All patients had baseline and post-chemoradiation staging including an endoscopic biopsy. Multiple statistical methods were used to analyze outcomes. Results: Most patients were men and most had stage III or IV cancer. Five patients were surgery eligible but declined to have surgery. The median follow-up time was 33.9 months (95% CI 18.3-49.6). The median survival time (MST) for 66 patients was only 14.5 months (95% CI 10.8-19.7) and the median relapse-free survival (RFS) was 5.03 months (95% CI 4.67-6.40). The estimated overall survival (OS) and RFS rates at 3 years were 22.6% (95% CI 13.7-37.3) and 7.7% (95% CI 3.2-18.6), respectively. Twenty-three (35%) patients who achieved a clinical complete response (cCR; negative post-chemoradiation biopsy and no progression by imaging) fared better than those who achieved less than cCR (<cCR) [cCR: MST 30.7 months (95% CI 20.4- NA); <cCR: MST 10.6 months (95% CI 8.43-14.9); p < 001]. In multivariate analysis, cCR was the only independent prognosticator for OS [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.32, p < 0.0012] and RFS (HR = 0.12, p < 0.0001). Conclusion: Our data demonstrate that in the absence of surgery, outcomes with definitive chemoradiation are only modest. A third of the patients achieved cCR and had a longer OS and RFS than those who achieved <cCR. Copyright (C) 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel
引用
收藏
页码:347 / 351
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Pathological complete response in patients with esophageal cancer after the trimodality approach: The association with baseline variables and survivalThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center experience
    Murphy, Mariela Blum
    Xiao, Lianchum
    Patel, Viren R.
    Maru, Dipen M.
    Correa, Arlene M.
    Amlashi, Fatemeh G.
    Liao, Zhongxing
    Komaki, Ritsuko
    Lin, Steven H.
    Skinner, Heath D.
    Vaporciyan, Ara
    Walsh, Garrett L.
    Swisher, Stephen G.
    Sepesi, Boris
    Lee, Jeffrey H.
    Bhutani, Manoop S.
    Weston, Brian
    Hofstetter, Wayne L.
    Ajani, Jaffer A.
    CANCER, 2017, 123 (21) : 4106 - 4113
  • [22] Impact of Gastric Cancer Surgery in Elderly Patients
    Wakahara, Tomoyuki
    Ueno, Nozomi
    Maeda, Tetsuo
    Kanemitsu, Kiyonori
    Yoshikawa, Takuro
    Tsuchida, Shinobu
    Toyokawa, Akihiro
    ONCOLOGY, 2018, 94 (02) : 79 - 84
  • [23] Prognostic factors in patients with vulvar cancer treated with primary surgery: a single-center experience
    Imoto, Sayaka
    Inamine, Morihiko
    Kudaka, Wataru
    Nagai, Yutaka
    Wakayama, Akihiko
    Nakamoto, Tomoko
    Ooyama, Takuma
    Aoki, Yoichi
    SPRINGERPLUS, 2016, 5 : 1 - 5
  • [24] Radical surgery for gastric cancer in octogenarian patients
    Casella, Francesco
    Sansonetti, Andrea
    Zanoni, Andrea
    Vincenza, Cofini
    Capodacqua, Alberto
    Verzaro, Roberto
    UPDATES IN SURGERY, 2017, 69 (03) : 389 - 395
  • [25] Gastric cancer: surgery in 2011
    Ott, Katja
    Lordick, Florian
    Blank, Susanne
    Buechler, Markus
    LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2011, 396 (06) : 743 - 758
  • [26] Fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel (FLOT) regimen in the first-line treatment of metastatic gastric cancer: A single-center experience
    Tastekin, Didem
    Paksoy, Nail
    Dogan, Izzet
    Ferhatoglu, Ferhat
    Khanmammadov, Nijat
    Bozbey, Hamza U.
    Karabulut, Senem
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2023, 19 (02) : 253 - 258
  • [27] Complete mesogastric excision for gastric cancer: is it the future of gastric cancer surgery?
    Lianos, Georgios D.
    Bali, Christina D.
    Vlachos, Konstantinos
    Drosou, Panagiota
    Rausei, Stefano
    Mitsis, Michail
    Schizas, Dimitrios
    PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2023, 20 (05) : 461 - 466
  • [28] Differences in gastric cancer surgery outcome between East and West: differences in surgery or different diseases?
    Griniatsos, John
    Trafalis, Dimitris
    JOURNAL OF BUON, 2018, 23 (05): : 1210 - 1215
  • [29] Prognostic Factors of Survival in Patients With Gastric Cancer Under 45 Years Old Treated With Surgery in a Single Center in Mexico City
    Guzman, Rafael Medrano
    Gonzalez, Eulalio Jimenez
    Rivera, Atl Simon Arias
    Rios, Luis E. Garcia
    Chaoul, Moises Brener
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (07)
  • [30] Metastatic gastric cancer successfully treated with surgery and chemoteraphy. Case report
    Gunnellini, M.
    Graziosi, L.
    Emili, R.
    Bugiantella, W.
    Ferrazza, P.
    Cavazzoni, E.
    Donini, A.
    Liberati, A. M.
    GIORNALE DI CHIRURGIA, 2010, 31 (8-9): : 375 - 378