Application of Rasch rating scale model to analysis of job satisfaction among practicing pharmacists

被引:14
作者
Hardigan, Patrick C. [1 ]
Carvajal, Manuel J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Nova SE Univ, Ft Lauderdale, FL 33328 USA
[2] Florida Int Univ, Dept Econ, Miami, FL 33199 USA
关键词
job satisfaction; Rasch analysis; pharmacists; research methods; surveys;
D O I
10.1331/JAPhA.2008.07042
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Objective: To demonstrate the application of Rasch analysis in the study of job satisfaction among practicing pharmacists. Design: Cross-sectional survey study. Setting: Community independent, community chain, hospital, and other pharmacies in the United States in fall 2005. Participants: 790 practicing pharmacists. Intervention: Mailed survey based on past studies of job satisfaction. Main outcome measure: Job satisfaction as measured using the Rasch rating scale model (which considers responses on Likert scales as categorical data) and traditional estimation techniques (which assume a continuum among responses on these scales by analyzing data as interval). Results: A gain in precision for the Rasch technique was observed for the constructs distributive justice, job autonomy, job ambiguity, role conflict, positive affectivity, job resources, and supervisory support. No gain in precision was found for the constructs negative affectivity and work involvement. Traditional estimates offered more precision for the constructs job repetition, promotional opportunity, and workload. Conclusion: Compared with traditional estimates, Rasch estimates provided more precise scores of job satisfaction on certain subscales, especially those whose mean scores were large or responses more diverse.
引用
收藏
页码:522 / 529
页数:8
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   RATING FORMULATION FOR ORDERED RESPONSE CATEGORIES [J].
ANDRICH, D .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1978, 43 (04) :561-573
[2]  
Bond Trevor G., 2001, Applying the rasch model: fundamental measurement in the human science
[3]  
Cohen L., 2000, Teaching in Higher Education, V5th
[4]  
Hardigan PC, 2000, J PHARM MARKETING MA, V13, P28
[5]   Likert scales: how to (ab)use them [J].
Jamieson, S .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2004, 38 (12) :1217-1218
[6]  
Linacre John M, 2002, J Appl Meas, V3, P85
[7]  
Maio V, 2004, P&T, V29, P184
[8]   Evaluation of the MOS SF-36 physical functioning scale (PF-10) .2. Comparison of relative precision using Likert and Rasch scoring methods [J].
McHorney, CA ;
Haley, SM ;
Ware, JE .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1997, 50 (04) :451-461
[9]   THE VALIDITY AND RELATIVE PRECISION OF MOS SHORT-FORM AND LONG-FORM HEALTH-STATUS SCALES AND DARTMOUTH COOP CHARTS - RESULTS FROM THE MEDICAL OUTCOMES STUDY [J].
MCHORNEY, CA ;
WARE, JE ;
ROGERS, W ;
RACZEK, AE ;
LU, JFR .
MEDICAL CARE, 1992, 30 (05) :MS253-MS265
[10]  
Mott David A, 2004, J Am Pharm Assoc (2003), V44, P326, DOI 10.1331/154434504323063968