Stability After Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy Advancement Surgery With Rigid Internal Fixation: A Systematic Review

被引:173
作者
Joss, Christof Urs [1 ]
Vassalli, Isabella Maria [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Geneva, Sect Med Dent, Fac Med, Dept Orthodont, CH-1205 Geneva, Switzerland
[2] Univ Bern, Dept Orthodont & Dentofacial Orthoped, Bern, Switzerland
关键词
BICORTICAL SCREW FIXATION; SOFT-TISSUE PROFILE; MANDIBULAR ADVANCEMENT; SKELETAL STABILITY; WIRE FIXATION; ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT; SURGICAL ADVANCEMENT; SUPRAHYOID MYOTOMY; RAMUS OSTEOTOMY; FOLLOW-UP;
D O I
10.1016/j.joms.2008.06.060
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate horizontal relapse and its causes in bilateral sagittal split advancement osteotomy (BSSO) with rigid internal fixation of different types. Materials and Methods: A search of the literature was performed in the databases PubMed, Ovid, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar Beta. From 488 articles identified, 24 articles were finally included. Six studies were prospective, and 18 were retrospective. The range of postoperative study records was 6 months to 12.7 years. Results: The short-term relapse for bicortical screws was between 1.5% and 32.7%, for miniplates between 1.5% and 18.0%, and for bioresorbable bicortical screws between 10.4% and 17.4%, at point B. The long-term relapse for bicortical screws was between 2.0% and 50.3%, and for miniplates between 1.5% and 8.9%, at point B. Conclusions: BSSO for mandibular advancement is a good treatment option for skeletal Class 11, but seems less stable than BSSO setback in the short and long terms. Bicortical screws of titanium, stainless steel, or bioresorbable material show little difference regarding skeletal stability compared with miniplates in the short term. A greater number of studies with larger skeletal long-term relapse rates were evident in patients treated with bicortical screws instead of miniplates. The etiology of relapse is multifactorial, involving the proper seating of the condyles, the amount of advancement, the soft tissue and muscles, the mandibular plane angle, the remaining growth and remodeling, the skill of the Surgeon, and preoperative age. Patients with a low mandibular plane angle have increased vertical relapse, whereas patients with a high mandibular plane angle have more horizontal relapse. Advancements in the range of 6 to 7 mm or more predispose to horizontal relapse. To obtain reliable scientific evidence, further short-term and long-term research into BSSO advancement with rigid internal fixation should exclude additional Surgery, ie, genioplasty or maxillary Surgery, and include a prospective Study or randomized clinical trial design with correlation statistics. (C) 2009 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
引用
收藏
页码:301 / 313
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   A long-term comparative study of two rigid internal fixation techniques in terms of masticatory function and neurosensory disturbance after mandibular correction by bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy [J].
Yamashita, Y. ;
Otsuka, T. ;
Shigematsu, M. ;
Goto, M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2011, 40 (04) :360-365
[32]   Preliminary assessment of skeletal stability after sagittal split mandibular advancement using a bioresorbable fixation system [J].
Matthews, NS ;
Khambay, BS ;
Ayoub, AF ;
Koppel, D ;
Wood, G .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2003, 41 (03) :179-184
[33]   Independent risk factors for long-term skeletal relapse after mandibular advancement with bilateral sagittal split osteotomy [J].
Chen, Y. ;
Zhang, J. ;
Rao, N. ;
Han, Y. ;
Ferraro, N. ;
August, M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2020, 49 (06) :779-786
[34]   Does Fixation Method Affect Stability of Sagittal Split Osteotomy and Condylar Position? [J].
Tabrizi, Reza ;
Pourdanesh, Fereydoun ;
Sadeghi, Hassan Mirmohammad ;
Shahidi, Sholeh ;
Poorian, Behnaz .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2017, 75 (12) :2668.e1-2668.e6
[35]   Mandibular stability using sliding or conventional four-hole plates for fixation after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular setback [J].
Lee, H. G. ;
Agpoon, K. J. ;
Besana, A. N. ;
Lim, H. K. ;
Jang, H. S. ;
Lee, E. S. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2017, 55 (04) :378-382
[36]   Relationship of body mass index to stability of mandibular advancement surgery with rigid fixation [J].
Neeley, Wendell W., II ;
Dolce, Calogero ;
Hatch, John P. ;
Van Sickels, Joseph E. ;
Rugh, John D. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2009, 136 (02) :175-184
[37]   Penetration of inferior alveolar nerve canal increased by bicortical fixation after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy in mandibular prognathism [J].
Sinha, S. P. ;
Duong, T. D. H. ;
Duy, T-D T. ;
Ko, E. W-C ;
Chen, Y-R ;
Huang, C. S. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2022, 51 (02) :200-205
[38]   Postoperative relapse after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy of the mandible for correction of dentofacial deformity: Is it common? [J].
Osman, Mohammed H. ;
Shaltout, Salah El-Dein G. ;
Saber, Diaa ;
Shahine, Mohammed S. .
EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 42 (01) :97-107
[39]   Stability of fixation methods in large mandibular advancements after sagittal split ramus osteotomy: an in vitro biomechanical study [J].
Kuik, K. ;
Ho, J. P. T. F. ;
de Ruiter, M. H. T. ;
Klop, C. ;
Kleverlaan, C. J. ;
de Lange, J. ;
Hoekema, A. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2021, 59 (04) :466-471
[40]   Dental or Skeletal Relapse After Sagittal Split Osteotomy Advancement Surgery? Long-Term Follow-Up [J].
Moen, Ketil ;
Wisth, Per Johan ;
Skaale, Siren ;
Boe, Olav Egil ;
Tornes, Knut .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2011, 69 (11) :E461-E468