Stability After Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy Advancement Surgery With Rigid Internal Fixation: A Systematic Review

被引:168
作者
Joss, Christof Urs [1 ]
Vassalli, Isabella Maria [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Geneva, Sect Med Dent, Fac Med, Dept Orthodont, CH-1205 Geneva, Switzerland
[2] Univ Bern, Dept Orthodont & Dentofacial Orthoped, Bern, Switzerland
关键词
BICORTICAL SCREW FIXATION; SOFT-TISSUE PROFILE; MANDIBULAR ADVANCEMENT; SKELETAL STABILITY; WIRE FIXATION; ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT; SURGICAL ADVANCEMENT; SUPRAHYOID MYOTOMY; RAMUS OSTEOTOMY; FOLLOW-UP;
D O I
10.1016/j.joms.2008.06.060
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate horizontal relapse and its causes in bilateral sagittal split advancement osteotomy (BSSO) with rigid internal fixation of different types. Materials and Methods: A search of the literature was performed in the databases PubMed, Ovid, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar Beta. From 488 articles identified, 24 articles were finally included. Six studies were prospective, and 18 were retrospective. The range of postoperative study records was 6 months to 12.7 years. Results: The short-term relapse for bicortical screws was between 1.5% and 32.7%, for miniplates between 1.5% and 18.0%, and for bioresorbable bicortical screws between 10.4% and 17.4%, at point B. The long-term relapse for bicortical screws was between 2.0% and 50.3%, and for miniplates between 1.5% and 8.9%, at point B. Conclusions: BSSO for mandibular advancement is a good treatment option for skeletal Class 11, but seems less stable than BSSO setback in the short and long terms. Bicortical screws of titanium, stainless steel, or bioresorbable material show little difference regarding skeletal stability compared with miniplates in the short term. A greater number of studies with larger skeletal long-term relapse rates were evident in patients treated with bicortical screws instead of miniplates. The etiology of relapse is multifactorial, involving the proper seating of the condyles, the amount of advancement, the soft tissue and muscles, the mandibular plane angle, the remaining growth and remodeling, the skill of the Surgeon, and preoperative age. Patients with a low mandibular plane angle have increased vertical relapse, whereas patients with a high mandibular plane angle have more horizontal relapse. Advancements in the range of 6 to 7 mm or more predispose to horizontal relapse. To obtain reliable scientific evidence, further short-term and long-term research into BSSO advancement with rigid internal fixation should exclude additional Surgery, ie, genioplasty or maxillary Surgery, and include a prospective Study or randomized clinical trial design with correlation statistics. (C) 2009 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
引用
收藏
页码:301 / 313
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Fixation methods in sagittal split ramus osteotomy: a systematic review on in vitro biomechanical assessments
    Kuik, K.
    De Ruiter, M. H. T.
    De Lange, J.
    Hoekema, A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2019, 48 (01) : 56 - 70
  • [22] Mechanical evaluation of six techniques for stable fixation of the sagittal split osteotomy after counterclockwise mandibular advancement
    De Oliveira, Leandro Benetti
    Nunes Reis, Jose Mauricio
    Spin-Neto, Rubens
    Cabrini Gabrielli, Marisa Aparecida
    Oguz, Yener
    Pereira-Filho, Valfrido Antonio
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2016, 54 (05) : 573 - 578
  • [23] Extraoral vertical subcondylar osteotomy with rigid fixation for correction of mandibular prognathism. Comparison with bilateral sagittal split osteotomy and surgical technique
    Hagensli, Niels
    Stenvik, Arild
    Espeland, Lisen
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2013, 41 (03) : 212 - 218
  • [24] An In Vitro Evaluation of Rigid Internal Fixation Techniques for Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomies: Setback Surgery
    Brasileiro, Bernardo Ferreira
    Grotta-Grempel, Rafael
    Bovi Ambrosano, Glaucia Maria
    Passeri, Luis Augusto
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2012, 70 (04) : 941 - 951
  • [25] Bilateral Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy Versus Distraction Osteogenesis for Advancement of the Retrognathic Mandible
    Al-Moraissi, Essam Ahmed
    Ellis, Edward, III
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2015, 73 (08) : 1564 - 1574
  • [26] In Vitro Biomechanical Evaluation of Modified Plating Techniques for Bilateral Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy in Mandibular Advancement
    Sener, Ismail
    Arici, Selim
    Bereket, Cihan
    Tek, Mustafa
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2012, 23 (05) : 1573 - 1576
  • [27] Prevalence of lingual sensory impairment following bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kostares, Evangelos
    Kostares, Michael
    Kostare, Georgia
    Kantzanou, Maria
    ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY-HEIDELBERG, 2024, 28 (03): : 1055 - 1062
  • [28] Comparison of the Effects of Ultrasonic and Conventional Surgery on the Neurosensory Disturbance After Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy
    Kokuryo, Shinya
    Habu, Manabu
    Kita, Ryosuke
    Katsuki, Takeshi
    Tominaga, Kazuhiro
    Yoshioka, Izumi
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2018, 76 (07) : 1539 - 1545
  • [29] Effect of Rigid Fixation on Orthodontic Finishing After Mandibular Bilateral Sagittal Split Setback: The Case for Miniplate Monocortical Fixation
    Cho, Heon Jae
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2012, 70 (04) : E310 - E321
  • [30] Skeletal Stability after Mandibular Setback via Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy Verse Intraoral Vertical Ramus Osteotomy: A Systematic Review
    Chen, Chun-Ming
    Hwang, Dae-Seok
    Hsiao, Szu-Yu
    Chen, Han-Sheng
    Hsu, Kun-Jung
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (21)