Stability After Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy Advancement Surgery With Rigid Internal Fixation: A Systematic Review

被引:167
|
作者
Joss, Christof Urs [1 ]
Vassalli, Isabella Maria [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Geneva, Sect Med Dent, Fac Med, Dept Orthodont, CH-1205 Geneva, Switzerland
[2] Univ Bern, Dept Orthodont & Dentofacial Orthoped, Bern, Switzerland
关键词
BICORTICAL SCREW FIXATION; SOFT-TISSUE PROFILE; MANDIBULAR ADVANCEMENT; SKELETAL STABILITY; WIRE FIXATION; ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT; SURGICAL ADVANCEMENT; SUPRAHYOID MYOTOMY; RAMUS OSTEOTOMY; FOLLOW-UP;
D O I
10.1016/j.joms.2008.06.060
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate horizontal relapse and its causes in bilateral sagittal split advancement osteotomy (BSSO) with rigid internal fixation of different types. Materials and Methods: A search of the literature was performed in the databases PubMed, Ovid, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar Beta. From 488 articles identified, 24 articles were finally included. Six studies were prospective, and 18 were retrospective. The range of postoperative study records was 6 months to 12.7 years. Results: The short-term relapse for bicortical screws was between 1.5% and 32.7%, for miniplates between 1.5% and 18.0%, and for bioresorbable bicortical screws between 10.4% and 17.4%, at point B. The long-term relapse for bicortical screws was between 2.0% and 50.3%, and for miniplates between 1.5% and 8.9%, at point B. Conclusions: BSSO for mandibular advancement is a good treatment option for skeletal Class 11, but seems less stable than BSSO setback in the short and long terms. Bicortical screws of titanium, stainless steel, or bioresorbable material show little difference regarding skeletal stability compared with miniplates in the short term. A greater number of studies with larger skeletal long-term relapse rates were evident in patients treated with bicortical screws instead of miniplates. The etiology of relapse is multifactorial, involving the proper seating of the condyles, the amount of advancement, the soft tissue and muscles, the mandibular plane angle, the remaining growth and remodeling, the skill of the Surgeon, and preoperative age. Patients with a low mandibular plane angle have increased vertical relapse, whereas patients with a high mandibular plane angle have more horizontal relapse. Advancements in the range of 6 to 7 mm or more predispose to horizontal relapse. To obtain reliable scientific evidence, further short-term and long-term research into BSSO advancement with rigid internal fixation should exclude additional Surgery, ie, genioplasty or maxillary Surgery, and include a prospective Study or randomized clinical trial design with correlation statistics. (C) 2009 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
引用
收藏
页码:301 / 313
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of postoperative stability of three rigid internal fixation techniques after sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular advancement
    Loureiro Sato, Fabio Ricardo
    Asprino, Luciana
    Fernandes Moreira, Roger William
    de Moraes, Marcio
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2014, 42 (05) : E224 - E229
  • [2] Skeletal Stability after Bilateral Sagittal Split Advancement and Setback Osteotomy of the Mandible with Miniplate Fixation
    Rao, Srinivasan Hanumantha
    Selvaraj, Loganathan
    Lankupalli, Arathy S.
    CRANIOMAXILLOFACIAL TRAUMA & RECONSTRUCTION, 2014, 7 (01) : 9 - 15
  • [3] Hybrid fixation in the bilateral sagittal split osteotomy for lower jaw advancement
    Pereira, Felipe Ladeira
    Janson, Marcos
    Sant'Ana, Eduardo
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ORAL SCIENCE, 2010, 18 (01) : 92 - 99
  • [4] Biomechanical stability analysis of rigid intraoral fixation for bilateral sagittal split osteotomy
    Lee Ming-Yih
    Lin Chun-Li
    Tsai Wen-Da
    Lo Lun-Jou
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2010, 63 (03) : 451 - 455
  • [5] Soft Tissue Profile Changes After Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy for Mandibular Advancement: A Systematic Review
    Joss, Christof Urs
    Joss-Vassalli, Isabella Maria
    Kiliaridis, Stavros
    Kuijpers-Jagtman, Anne Marie
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2010, 68 (06) : 1260 - 1269
  • [6] The role of muscular traction in the occurrence of skeletal relapse after advancement bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO): A systematic review
    van den Bempt, Maxim
    Vinayahalingam, Shankeeth
    Han, Michael D.
    Berge, Stefaan J.
    Xi, Tong
    ORTHODONTICS & CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH, 2022, 25 (01) : 1 - 13
  • [7] An in Vitro Evaluation of Rigid internal Fixation Techniques for Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomies: Advancement Surgery
    Brasileiro, Bernardo Ferreira
    Grempel, Rafael Grotta
    Bovi Ambrosano, Glaucia Maria
    Passeri, Luis Augusto
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2009, 67 (04) : 809 - 817
  • [8] Skeletal stability after mandibular advancement in bilateral sagittal split osteotomies during adolescence
    den Besten, C. A.
    Mensink, G.
    van Merkesteyn, J. P. R.
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2013, 41 (05) : E78 - E82
  • [9] Stability of bicortical screw versus plate fixation after mandibular setback with the bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Al-Moraissi, E. A. M.
    Ellis, E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2016, 45 (01) : 1 - 7
  • [10] Are bicortical screw and plate osteosynthesis techniques equal in providing skeletal stability with the bilateral sagittal split osteotomy when used for mandibular advancement surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Al-Moraissi, E. A.
    Al-Hendi, E. A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2016, 45 (10) : 1195 - 1200