共 43 条
- [31] A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, 8-Week Comparative Trial of Standard Doses of Esomeprazole (40 mg) and Omeprazole (20 mg) for the Treatment of Erosive Esophagitis Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 2006, 51 : 844 - 850
- [33] A double-blind, randomized comparison of omeprazole Multiple Unit Pellet System (MUPS) 20 mg, lansoprazole 30 mg and pantoprazole 40 mg in symptomatic reflux oesophagitis followed by 3 months of omeprazole MUPS maintenance treatment: a Dutch multicentre trial EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2002, 14 (06) : 649 - 656
- [34] Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Pantoprazole Magnesium and Pantoprazole Sodium in the Treatment of Gastro-Oesophageal Reflux DiseaseA Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled, Multicentre Trial Clinical Drug Investigation, 2011, 31 : 655 - 664
- [35] Intragastric pH effect of 20 mg of levo-pantoprazole versus 40 mg of racemic pantoprazole the first seven days of treatment in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease REVISTA DE GASTROENTEROLOGIA DE MEXICO, 2020, 85 (01): : 48 - 55
- [37] Clinical trial: evaluation of gastric acid suppression with three doses of immediate-release esomeprazole in the fixed-dose combination of PN 400 (naproxen/esomeprazole magnesium) compared with naproxen 500 mg and enteric-coated esomeprazole 20 mg: a randomized, open-label, Phase I study in healthy volunteers ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2010, 32 (03) : 414 - 424
- [38] Financial restrictions in health care systems could affect treatment quality of GERD-patients -: Clinical trial revealed significantly higher symptom load with omeprazole 20 mg compared to pantoprazole 40 mg ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE, 2006, 44 (05): : 379 - 385
- [40] Long-term management of patients with symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease -: a Norwegian randomised prospective study comparing the effects of esomeprazole and ranitidine treatment strategies on health-related quality of life in a general practitioners setting INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2006, 60 (01) : 15 - 22