Clinical trial: the treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in primary care - prospective randomized comparison of rabeprazole 20 mg with esomeprazole 20 and 40 mg

被引:19
作者
Eggleston, A. [1 ]
Katelaris, P. H. [2 ]
Nandurkar, S. [3 ]
Thorpe, P. [4 ]
Holtmann, G. [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Janssen Cilag Pty Ltd, N Ryde, NSW 2113, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Concord Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[3] Box Hill Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Box Hill, Vic, Australia
[4] Primary Old Port Rd Med & Dent Ctr, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[5] Univ Adelaide, Dept Med, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
[6] Univ Hosp Essen, Fac Med, Essen, Germany
基金
澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究理事会;
关键词
PROTON PUMP INHIBITORS; ACID SUPPRESSION; MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; OMEPRAZOLE; DYSPEPSIA; LANSOPRAZOLE; PANTOPRAZOLE; GUIDELINES; ARTICLE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2036.2009.03948.x
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
A trial of empirical PPI therapy is usual practice for most patients with symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in primary care. To determine if the 4-week efficacy of rabeprazole 20 mg for resolving heartburn and regurgitation symptoms is non-inferior to esomeprazole 40 mg or 20 mg. In all, 1392 patients were randomized to rabeprazole 20 mg, esomeprazole 20 mg or 40 mg once daily. Patients, doctors and assessors were blinded. Symptom resolution data were collected on days 0-7 and day-28 using the Patient Assessment of Upper Gastrointestinal Disorders Symptom Severity Index with a shortened version used on days 8-27. Rabeprazole 20 mg was non-inferior to esomeprazole 40 mg for complete resolution of regurgitation and satisfactory resolution of heartburn and regurgitation. For complete heartburn resolution, the efficacy of rabeprazole 20 mg and esomeprazole 40 mg was statistically indistinguishable, although the non-inferiority test was inconclusive. Rabeprazole 20 mg was non-inferior to esomeprazole 20 mg for all outcomes. In uninvestigated GERD patients, rabeprazole 20 mg was non-inferior to esomeprazole 40 mg for complete and satisfactory relief of regurgitation and satisfactory relief of heartburn, and not different for complete resolution of heartburn.
引用
收藏
页码:967 / 978
页数:12
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [31] A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, 8-Week Comparative Trial of Standard Doses of Esomeprazole (40 mg) and Omeprazole (20 mg) for the Treatment of Erosive Esophagitis
    Colleen Schmitt
    Charles J. Lightdale
    Clara Hwang
    Bernard Hamelin
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 2006, 51 : 844 - 850
  • [32] A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, 8-week comparative trial of standard doses of esomeprazole (40 mg) and omeprazole (20 mg) for the treatment of erosive esophagitis
    Schmitt, Colleen
    Lightdale, Charles J.
    Hwang, Clara
    Hamelin, Bernard
    DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2006, 51 (05) : 844 - 850
  • [33] A double-blind, randomized comparison of omeprazole Multiple Unit Pellet System (MUPS) 20 mg, lansoprazole 30 mg and pantoprazole 40 mg in symptomatic reflux oesophagitis followed by 3 months of omeprazole MUPS maintenance treatment: a Dutch multicentre trial
    Mulder, CJJ
    Westerveld, BD
    Smit, JM
    Pool, MO
    Otten, MH
    Tan, TG
    de Wit, AWMV
    de Groot, GH
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2002, 14 (06) : 649 - 656
  • [34] Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Pantoprazole Magnesium and Pantoprazole Sodium in the Treatment of Gastro-Oesophageal Reflux DiseaseA Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled, Multicentre Trial
    Jasper Hein
    Clinical Drug Investigation, 2011, 31 : 655 - 664
  • [35] Intragastric pH effect of 20 mg of levo-pantoprazole versus 40 mg of racemic pantoprazole the first seven days of treatment in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease
    Remes-Troche, J. M.
    Garcia, F. D. Garcia
    Rojas-Loureiro, G.
    Rivera-Gutierrez, X.
    Reyes-Huerta, J.
    Amieva-Balmori, M.
    REVISTA DE GASTROENTEROLOGIA DE MEXICO, 2020, 85 (01): : 48 - 55
  • [36] Laparoscopic fundoplication versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in obese patients: protocol for a randomized clinical trial
    Frankel, Adam
    Thomson, Iain
    Shah, Ayesha
    Chen, Chen
    Zahir, Syeda Farah
    Barbour, Andrew
    Holtmann, Gerald
    Smithers, B. Mark
    BJS OPEN, 2022, 6 (06):
  • [37] Clinical trial: evaluation of gastric acid suppression with three doses of immediate-release esomeprazole in the fixed-dose combination of PN 400 (naproxen/esomeprazole magnesium) compared with naproxen 500 mg and enteric-coated esomeprazole 20 mg: a randomized, open-label, Phase I study in healthy volunteers
    Miner, P., Jr.
    Plachetka, J.
    Orlemans, E.
    Fort, J. G.
    Sostek, M.
    ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2010, 32 (03) : 414 - 424
  • [38] Financial restrictions in health care systems could affect treatment quality of GERD-patients -: Clinical trial revealed significantly higher symptom load with omeprazole 20 mg compared to pantoprazole 40 mg
    Gillessen, A.
    Schoeffel, L.
    Naumburger, A.
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE, 2006, 44 (05): : 379 - 385
  • [39] Therapeutic Response to 20 mg of Esomeprazole Twice Daily in Patients with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-related Non-cardiac Chest Pain: An Open-Label Randomized Pilot Study
    Choi, Jae Kyun
    Shim, Hyun Ik
    Shin, Cheol Min
    Yoon, Hyuk
    Park, Young Soo
    Kim, Nayoung
    Lee, Dong Ho
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2020, 75 (06) : 333 - 340
  • [40] Long-term management of patients with symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease -: a Norwegian randomised prospective study comparing the effects of esomeprazole and ranitidine treatment strategies on health-related quality of life in a general practitioners setting
    Hansen, ÅN
    Bergheim, R
    Fagertun, H
    Lund, H
    Wiklund, I
    Moum, B
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2006, 60 (01) : 15 - 22