Design and characterization of flattening filter for high dose rate 192Ir and 60Co Leipzig applicators used in skin cancer brachytherapy: A Monte Carlo study

被引:4
|
作者
Ghobadi, Parvin [1 ]
Farhood, Bagher [1 ]
Ghorbani, Mahdi [2 ]
Mohseni, Mehran [1 ]
机构
[1] Kashan Univ Med Sci, Fac Paramed Sci, Dept Med Phys & Radiol, Kashan, Iran
[2] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Sch Med, Biomed Engn & Med Phys Dept, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Skin cancer; High dose rate brachytherapy; Ir-192; Co-60; Leipzig applicator; Flattening filter; VALENCIA; PHANTOM;
D O I
10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.103878
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Purpose: This study aimed to design optimal flattening filters for high dose rate (HDR) Ir-192 and Co-60 Leipzig applicators which are used to treat skin cancer. Materials and methods: MCNPX Monte Carlo code was used to design flattening filters for Leipzig applicators with inner diameters of 1, 2 and 3 cm. Then, their dosimetric characterizations such as dose distribution, dose profile, percentage depth dose, flatness, symmetry and homogeneity were evaluated in a 20 x 20 x 20 cm(3) water phantom and compared with those without the flattening filter. Results: The flattening filter thickness varied from 0 mm (at the edge) to the maximum values of 0.30, 1.18, and 2.41 mm for the Ir-192 Leipzig applicators of H1, H2, and H3 type, respectively. This quantity has maximum values of 0.96, 6.27, and 12.31 mm for the Co-60 double wall applicators of D1, D2, and D3 type, respectively. The dose profile flatness values for the H1, H2, and H3 Ir-192 Leipzig applicators with the optimal flattening filters were 0.76, 1.26, and 1.85%, respectively. Furthermore, the dose profile flatness values for the D1, D2, and D3 Co-60 double wall applicators with the optimal flattening filters were 1.11, 2.10 and 3.12%, respectively. The dose profile symmetry values obtained from various source-applicator combinations were less than 1.02. Compared to the applicators without flattening filter, the homogeneity values for the H1, H2, and H3 Ir-192 Leipzig applicators with the optimal flattening filters were improved 1.68, 6.51, and 13.17 times, respectively, and for the D1, D2, and D3 Co-60 double wall applicators were improved 1.23, 6.21 and 9.54 times, respectively. Conclusion: The findings revealed that the inhomogeneous dose distribution resulted from the Leipzig applicators without the optimal flattening filter at the treatment surface could be improved by insertion of optimal lead flattening filters between the sources and treatment surface.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Evaluation of bone dose arising from skin cancer brachytherapy: A comparison between 192Ir and 60Co sources through Monte Carlo simulations
    Sheikholeslami, Sahar
    Khodaverdian, Shaghayegh
    Hashemzaei, Fatemeh
    Ghobadi, Parvin
    Ghorbani, Mahdi
    Farhood, Bagher
    COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE, 2021, 205
  • [2] Dosimetric comparison of 60Co and 192Ir high dose rate source used in brachytherapy treatment of cervical cancer
    Shukla, Arvind Kumar
    Jangid, Pawan Kumar
    Rajpurohit, Vikram Singh
    Verma, Atul
    Dangayach, Suresh Kumar
    Gagrani, Vaibhav
    Rathore, Narendra Kumar
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2019, 15 (06) : 1212 - 1215
  • [3] Comparative Analysis of 60Co and 192Ir Sources in High Dose Rate Brachytherapy for Cervical Cancer
    Wen, Aiping
    Wang, Xianliang
    Wang, Bingjie
    Yan, Chuanjun
    Luo, Jingyue
    Wang, Pei
    Li, Jie
    CANCERS, 2022, 14 (19)
  • [4] Comparison of 192Ir, 169Yb, and 60Co high-dose rate brachytherapy sources for skin cancer treatment
    Safigholi, Habib
    Meigooni, Ali S.
    Song, William Y.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (09) : 4426 - 4436
  • [5] Monte Carlo and TLD dosimetry of an 192Ir high dose-rate brachytherapy source
    Karaiskos, P
    Angelopoulos, A
    Sakelliou, L
    Sandilos, P
    Antypas, C
    Vlachos, L
    Koutsouveli, E
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1998, 25 (10) : 1975 - 1984
  • [6] Radiobiological and dosimetric comparison of 60Co versus 192Ir high-dose-rate intracavitary-interstitial brachytherapy for cervical cancer
    Wen, Aiping
    Wang, Xianliang
    Wang, Bingjie
    Yan, Chuanjun
    Luo, Jingyue
    Wang, Pei
    Li, Jie
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2022, 17 (01)
  • [7] A comparative assessment of inhomogeneity and finite patient dimension effects in 60Co and 192Ir high-dose-rate brachytherapy
    Fotina, Irina
    Zourari, Kyveli
    Lahanas, Vasileios
    Pantelis, Evaggelos
    Papagiannis, Panagiotis
    JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY BRACHYTHERAPY, 2018, 10 (01) : 73 - 84
  • [8] High-Dose-Rate 192Ir Brachytherapy Dose Verification: A Phantom Study
    Nikoofar, Alireza
    Hoseinpour, Zohreh
    Mahdavi, Seied Rabi
    Hasanzadeh, Hadi
    Tavirani, Mostafa Rezaei
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2015, 8 (03)
  • [9] High dose rate 192Ir versus high dose rate 60Co brachytherapy: an overview of systematic reviews of clinical responses of gynecological cancers from 1984 to 2020
    Abtahi, M.
    Gholami, S.
    Nashi, H. H. J.
    BIOMEDICAL PHYSICS & ENGINEERING EXPRESS, 2021, 7 (05):
  • [10] Monte Carlo characterization of high atomic number inorganic scintillators for in vivo dosimetry in 192Ir brachytherapy
    Kaveckyte, Vaiva
    Jorgensen, Erik B.
    Kertzscher, Gustavo
    Johansen, Jacob G.
    Carlsson Tedgren, Asa
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 49 (07) : 4715 - 4730