Predicting Cancer Prognosis Using Interactive Online Tools: A Systematic Review and Implications for Cancer Care Providers

被引:47
作者
Rabin, Borsika A. [1 ]
Gaglio, Bridget [4 ]
Sanders, Tristan [2 ]
Nekhlyudov, Larissa [6 ,7 ]
Dearing, James W. [1 ]
Bull, Sheana [3 ]
Glasgow, Russell E. [5 ]
Marcus, Alfred [3 ]
机构
[1] Inst Hlth Res, Canc Res Network, Canc Commun Res Ctr, Denver, CO USA
[2] Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Denver, CO 80231 USA
[3] Univ Colorado, Denver, CO 80202 USA
[4] Kaiser Permanente, Mid Atlantic Permanente Res Inst, Rockville, MD USA
[5] NCI, Rockville, MD USA
[6] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dept Populat Med, Boston, MA USA
[7] Harvard Vanguard Med Associates, Dept Med, Boston, MA USA
关键词
DECISION AIDS; PROSTATE-CANCER; HEALTH; INFORMATION; RISK; COMMUNICATION; MODEL; NEEDS;
D O I
10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-0513
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Cancer prognosis is of keen interest for patients with cancer, their caregivers, and providers. Prognostic tools have been developed to guide patient-physician communication and decision-making. Given the proliferation of prognostic tools, it is timely to review existing online cancer prognostic tools and discuss implications for their use in clinical settings. Using a systematic approach, we searched the Internet, Medline, and consulted with experts to identify existing online prognostic tools. Each was reviewed for content and format. Twenty-two prognostic tools addressing 89 different cancers were identified. Tools primarily focused on prostate (n = 11), colorectal (n = 10), breast (n = 8), and melanoma (n = 6), although at least one tool was identified for most malignancies. The input variables for the tools included cancer characteristics (n = 22), patient characteristics (n = 18), and comorbidities (n = 9). Effect of therapy on prognosis was included in 15 tools. The most common predicted outcome was cancer-specific survival/mortality (n = 17). Only a few tools (n = 4) suggested patients as potential target users. A comprehensive repository of online prognostic tools was created to understand the state-of-the-art in prognostic tool availability and characteristics. Use of these tools may support communication and understanding about cancer prognosis. Dissemination, testing, refinement of existing, and development of new tools under different conditions are needed. (C) 2013 AACR.
引用
收藏
页码:1645 / 1656
页数:12
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2011, LIT REV HLTH INFORM
[2]   Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Resected Stage II and III Colon Cancer: Comparison of Two Widely Used Prognostic Calculators [J].
Bardia, Aditya ;
Loprinzi, Charles ;
Grothey, Axel ;
Nelson, Garth ;
Alberts, Steven ;
Menon, Smitha ;
Thome, Stephan ;
Gill, Sharlene ;
Sargent, Dan .
SEMINARS IN ONCOLOGY, 2010, 37 (01) :39-46
[3]   Oncologist use of the Adjuvant! model for risk communication: a pilot study examining patient knowledge of 10-year prognosis [J].
Belkora, Jeffrey K. ;
Rugo, Hope S. ;
Moore, Dan H. ;
Hutton, David W. ;
Chen, Daniel F. ;
Esserman, Laura J. .
BMC CANCER, 2009, 9
[4]  
Breastcancer.org: Discussion Boards, WHAT PROGN CALC AR O
[5]   Prognostic Tools for Cancer Survival: A Secondary Role for Quality-of-Life Measurement [J].
Browman, George P. ;
Berrang, Tanya ;
Smith, Sally .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 27 (18) :2902-2904
[6]  
Crotty K, 2011, EVIDENCE REPORTS TEC
[7]   Health literacy and cancer communication [J].
Davis, TC ;
Williams, MV ;
Marin, E ;
Parker, RM ;
Glass, J .
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2002, 52 (03) :134-149
[8]   Patient's needs and preferences in routine follow-up after treatment for breast cancer [J].
de Bock, GH ;
Bonnema, J ;
Zwaan, RE ;
de Velde, CJH ;
Kievit, J ;
Stiggelbout, AM .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2004, 90 (06) :1144-1150
[9]   Riding the crest of the teachable moment: Promoting long-term health after the diagnosis of cancer [J].
Demark-Wahnefried, W ;
Aziz, NM ;
Rowland, JH ;
Pinto, BM .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (24) :5814-5830
[10]   Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process [J].
Elwyn, Glyn ;
O'Connor, Annette ;
Stacey, Dawn ;
Volk, Robert ;
Edwards, Adrian ;
Coulter, Angela ;
Thomson, Richard ;
Barrat, Alexandra ;
Butow, Phyllis ;
Barry, Michael ;
Mulley, Albert G. ;
Sepucha, Karen ;
Bernstein, Steven ;
Clarke, Aileen ;
Entwistle, Vikki ;
Feldman-Stewart, Deb ;
Holmes-Rovner, Margaret ;
Llewellyn-Thomas, Hilary ;
Moumjid, Nora ;
Ruland, Cornelia ;
Sykes, Alan ;
Whelan, Tim .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 333 (7565) :417-419