Verification of the oncologic inferiority of percutaneous biliary drainage to endoscopic drainage: A propensity score matching analysis of resectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma

被引:93
作者
Komaya, Kenichi [1 ]
Ebata, Tomoki [1 ]
Yokoyama, Yukihiro [1 ]
Igami, Tsuyoshi [1 ]
Sugawara, Gen [1 ]
Mizuno, Takashi [1 ]
Yamaguchi, Junpei [1 ]
Nagino, Masato [1 ]
机构
[1] Nagoya Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Surg, Div Surg Oncol, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
关键词
CATHETER TRACT RECURRENCE; LONG-TERM SURVIVAL; HILAR CHOLANGIOCARCINOMA; PORTAL-VEIN; HEPATECTOMY; OBSTRUCTION; METASTASES; MANAGEMENT; CARCINOMA; RESECTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.surg.2016.08.008
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage is an established biliary drainage method but is associated with a potential risk of seeding metastasis. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate whether percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage really increases seeding metastasis and worsens the postoperative survival in patients with resectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Methods. Patients who underwent resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma after percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage or endoscopic biliary drainage were retrospectively reviewed. Seeding metastasis was defined as peritoneal/pleural dissemination and percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage sinus tract recurrence. Univariate and multivariate analyses followed by propensity score matching were performed to adjust the data for the baseline characteristics of the percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage and endoscopic biliary drainage patients. Results. Of 320 resected patients, 168 underwent percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage and the remaining 152 received endoscopic biliary drainage before operation. The survival of the percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage patients was significantly lower than that of the endoscopic biliary drainage patients (37.0% vs 44.3% at 5 years, P = .019). Multivariate analyses showed that percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage was an independent predictor of poor survival (P = .011) and a risk factor for seeding metastasis (P = .005). After propensity score matching (71 patients in each group), the survival of the percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage patients was significantly worse than that of the endoscopic biliary drainage patients (P = .018). The estimated cumulative recurrence rate of seeding metastasis was significantly higher in the percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage patients than in the endoscopic biliary drainage patients = .005), while the recurrence rates at other sites were similar between the 2 groups (P = .413). Conclusion. Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage increases the incidence of seeding metastasis and shortens the postoperative survival in patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Endoscopic biliary drainage is recommended as the optimal method for preoperative biliary drainage.
引用
收藏
页码:394 / 404
页数:11
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Efficacy of preoperative endoscopic nasobiliary drainage for hilar cholangiocarcinoma [J].
Arakura, Norikazu ;
Takayama, Mari ;
Ozaki, Yayoi ;
Maruyama, Masafumi ;
Chou, Yoshimi ;
Kodama, Ryou ;
Ochi, Yasuhide ;
Hamano, Hideaki ;
Nakata, Takenari ;
Kajikawa, Shouji ;
Tanaka, Eiji ;
Kawa, Shigeyuki .
JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SURGERY, 2009, 16 (04) :473-477
[2]   An Introduction to Propensity Score Methods for Reducing the Effects of Confounding in Observational Studies [J].
Austin, Peter C. .
MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, 2011, 46 (03) :399-424
[3]   Improved outcome of resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma (Klatskin tumor) [J].
Dinant, Sander ;
Gerhards, Michael F. ;
Rauws, E. A. J. ;
Busch, Olivier R. C. ;
Gouma, Dirk J. ;
van Gulik, Thomas M. .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 13 (06) :872-880
[4]   Hepatopancreatoduodenectomy for Cholangiocarcinoma A Single-Center Review of 85 Consecutive Patients [J].
Ebata, Tomoki ;
Yokoyama, Yukihiro ;
Igami, Tsuyoshi ;
Sugawara, Gen ;
Takahashi, Yu ;
Nimura, Yuji ;
Nagino, Masato .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2012, 256 (02) :297-305
[5]   Oncological benefit of preoperative endoscopic biliary drainage in patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma [J].
Hirano, Satoshi ;
Tanaka, Eiichi ;
Tsuchikawa, Takahiro ;
Matsumoto, Joe ;
Kawakami, Hiroshi ;
Nakamura, Toru ;
Kurashima, Yo ;
Ebihara, Yuma ;
Shichinohe, Toshiaki .
JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES, 2014, 21 (08) :533-540
[6]   Reappraisal of Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Drainage Tract Recurrence After Resection of Perihilar Bile Duct Cancer [J].
Hwang, Shin ;
Song, Gi-Won ;
Ha, Tae-Yong ;
Lee, Young-Joo ;
Kim, Ki-Hun ;
Ahn, Chul-Soo ;
Sung, Kyu-Bo ;
Ko, Gi-Young ;
Kim, Myeong-Hwan ;
Lee, Sung-Koo ;
Moon, Deok-Bog ;
Jung, Dong-Hwang ;
Park, Gil-Chun ;
Lee, Sung-Gyu .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2012, 36 (02) :379-385
[7]   Role of Preoperative Biliary Drainage in Jaundiced Patients Who Are Candidates for Pancreatoduodenectomy or Hepatic Resection Highlights and Drawbacks [J].
Iacono, Calogero ;
Ruzzenente, Andrea ;
Campagnaro, Tommaso ;
Bortolasi, Luca ;
Valdegamberi, Alessandro ;
Guglielmi, Alfredo .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2013, 257 (02) :191-204
[8]   Comparison of Adverse Events for Endoscopic vs Percutaneous Biliary Drainage in the Treatment of Malignant Biliary Tract Obstruction in an Inpatient National Cohort [J].
Inamdar, Sumant ;
Slattery, Eoin ;
Bhalla, Ramandeep ;
Sejpal, Divyesh V. ;
Trindade, Arvind J. .
JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2016, 2 (01) :112-117
[9]   Staging, resectability, and outcome in 225 patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma [J].
Jarnagin, WR ;
Fong, Y ;
DeMatteo, RP ;
Gonen, M ;
Burke, EC ;
Bodniewicz, J ;
Youssef, M ;
Klimstra, D ;
Blumgart, LH .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2001, 234 (04) :507-517
[10]   The value of bile replacement during external biliary drainage - An analysis of intestinal permeability, integrity, and microflora [J].
Kamiya, S ;
Nagino, M ;
Kanazawa, H ;
Komatsu, S ;
Mayumi, T ;
Takagi, K ;
Asahara, T ;
Nomoto, K ;
Tanaka, R ;
Nimura, Y .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2004, 239 (04) :510-517