Productive effects of public works programs: What do we know? What should we know?

被引:35
作者
Gehrke, Esther [1 ]
Hartwig, Renate [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Goettingen, Dept Agr Econ & Rural Dev, Pl Goettinger Sieben 5, D-37073 Gottingen, Germany
[2] Univ Namur, Res Ctr Econ Dev CRED, Rempart Vierge 8, B-5000 Namur, Belgium
关键词
Public Works programs; Investment; Wages; Skills; Public goods; SAFETY NET PROGRAM; ETHIOPIA; IMPACT; TRANSFERS; RISK; EMPLOYMENT; ARGENTINA; WORKFARE; GROWTH; INDIA;
D O I
10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.02.031
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Public Works (PW) programs are popular development interventions due to their potential 'double dividend' of transferring income to the poor while at the same time creating public infrastructure. However, PW programs are costly and demanding from an administrative perspective and it is not clear whether they are the most cost-effective intervention to reduce poverty. Therefore, an assessment of PW programs needs to understand which benefits and costs these programs entail relative to other interventions, and whether or not the extra cost can be outweighed by generating benefits over and above those of alternative interventions, such as Cash Transfer programs. This paper seeks to identify these benefits, and develops a conceptual framework that highlights four mechanisms through which PW programs could strengthen the productive capacity of poor households beyond the effects of Cash Transfers: productive investments, labor market effects, skills development, and increases in trade and production. It then reviews available empirical evidence from PW programs in developing countries. The results suggest that PW programs can induce productive investments via income and insurance effects when the program is sufficiently reliable and long-term. PW programs can also have positive welfare effects by raising wages, but potential adverse effects on labor markets have to be taken into account. Implicit or explicit training components of PW programs do not seem to increase the employability or business earnings of participants. Finally, there is only scant empirical evidence on the productive effects of the public infrastructure generated by PW programs, and further research is crucial to understand and quantify those effects. This paper concludes that PW programs are only preferable over alternative interventions if they generate substantial investments among the target group, if there is clear evidence that private-sector wages are below equilibrium wages, or if the public infrastructure generated in PW programs has substantial growth effects. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:111 / 124
页数:14
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]   Impact of the productive safety net program on farmers' investments in sustainable land management in the Central Rift Valley of Ethiopia [J].
Adimassu, Zenebe ;
Kessler, Aad .
ENVIRONMENTAL DEVELOPMENT, 2015, 16 :54-62
[2]  
Afridi F., 2016, IZA J LABOR DEV, V5, P1, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1186/s40175-016-0053-y, DOI 10.1186/S40175-016-0053-Y]
[3]  
Agarwal S., 2016, 2880629 GEORG U GEOR
[4]  
Ahmed A. U., 2009, IFPRI RES MONOGRAPH
[5]   How Can Safety Nets Contribute to Economic Growth? [J].
Alderman, Harold ;
Yemtsov, Ruslan .
WORLD BANK ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2014, 28 (01) :1-20
[6]  
Altenburg T., 2015, DIE STUDIES
[7]   Impacts of the Productive Safety Net Program in Ethiopia on livestock and tree holdings of rural households [J].
Andersson, Camilla ;
Mekonnen, Alemu ;
Stage, Jesper .
JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2011, 94 (01) :119-126
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2014, WORLD DEV REP RISK O
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2004, INSURANCE POVERTY
[10]  
Atkin D., 2009, WORKING PAPER