Recent advances in patient-controlled epidural analgesia for labour

被引:13
作者
Halpern, Stephen [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Sunnybrook & Womens Coll, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Anaesthesia, Toronto, ON M5S 1B2, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1B2, Canada
关键词
analgesia; bupivacaine; labour; obstetrical; patient-controlled epidural analgesia; ropivacaine;
D O I
10.1097/01.aco.0000169229.75938.c8
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Purpose of review Patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) is a relatively new mode of maintenance of labour analgesia. The purpose of this review is to demonstrate that PCEA has several advantages over continuous-infusion analgesia and to discuss recent refinements in the use of PCEA for labour. Recent findings Early investigations showed that PCEA without background infusion reduced the incidence of motor block and the amount of local anaesthetic needed to produce satisfactory analgesia compared to continuous infusions. Recent studies have shown that the addition of a background infusion to PCEA may be advantageous, depending on the patient population and the rate of the continuous infusion. Both bupivacaine and ropivacaine have been used in PCEA but ropivacaine may be associated with a reduced incidence of motor block in parturients who have epidural analgesia for long periods of time. Of note, very low concentrations of local anaesthetics are required to produce satisfactory analgesia. Summary PCEA has proven to be a safe, convenient, and highly effective way to maintain labour analgesia. Parturients appreciate the control they have over the analgesia received throughout labour when this method is used.
引用
收藏
页码:247 / 251
页数:5
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] Ropivacaine and fentanyl concentrations in patient-controlled epidural analgesia during labor: A volume-range study
    Bernard, JM
    Le Roux, D
    Frouin, J
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2003, 97 (06) : 1800 - 1807
  • [2] Bogod D, 1996, Int J Obstet Anesth, V5, P61, DOI 10.1016/S0959-289X(96)80078-1
  • [3] Background infusion is not beneficial during labor patient-controlled analgesia with 0.1% ropivacaine plus 0.5 μg/ml sufentanil
    Boselli, E
    Debon, R
    Cimino, Y
    Rimmelé, T
    Allaouchiche, B
    Chassard, D
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2004, 100 (04) : 968 - 972
  • [4] Ropivacaine 0.15% plus sufentanil 0.5 μg/mL and ropivacaine 0.10% plus sufentanil 0.5 μg/mL are equivalent for patient-controlled epidural analgesia during labor
    Boselli, E
    Debon, R
    Duflo, F
    Bryssine, B
    Allaouchiche, B
    Chassard, D
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2003, 96 (04) : 1173 - 1177
  • [5] Campbell DC, 2004, ANESTHESIOLOGY, V101, pA1204
  • [6] Campbell DC, 2004, ANESTHESIOLOGY, V101, pA1210
  • [7] New techniques for labor analgesia: PCEA and CSE
    D'Angelo, R
    [J]. CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 46 (03) : 623 - 632
  • [8] EISEN S M, 1960, Can Anaesth Soc J, V7, P280
  • [9] PCEA compared to continuous epidural infusion in an ultra-low-dose regimen for labor pain relief: a randomized study
    Eriksson, SL
    Gentele, C
    Olofsson, CH
    [J]. ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2003, 47 (09) : 1085 - 1090
  • [10] Patient-controlled epidural analgesia for labor pain: effect on labor, delivery and neonatal outcome of 0.125% bupivacaine vs 0.2% ropivacaine
    Evron, S
    Glezerman, M
    Sadan, O
    Boaz, M
    Ezri, T
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA, 2004, 13 (01) : 5 - 10