Comparative effects of test-enhanced learning and self-explanation on long-term retention

被引:122
作者
Larsen, Douglas P. [1 ]
Butler, Andrew C. [2 ]
Roediger, Henry L., III [3 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Dept Neurol, St Louis Sch Med, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Dept Pscyhol & Neurosci, Durham, NC USA
[3] Washington Univ, Dept Psychol, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
关键词
MEMORY; RETRIEVAL; FACTS;
D O I
10.1111/medu.12141
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Context Educators often encourage students to engage in active learning by generating explanations for the material being learned, a method called self-explanation. Studies have also demonstrated that repeated testing improves retention. However, no studies have directly compared the two learning methods. Methods Forty-seven Year1 medical students completed the study. All students participated in a teaching session that covered four clinical topics and was followed by four weekly learning sessions. In the learning sessions, students were randomised to perform one of four learning activities for each topic: testing with self-generated explanations (TE); testing without explanations (T); studying a review sheet with self-generated explanations (SE), and studying a review sheet without explanations (S). Students repeated the same activity for each topic in all four sessions. Six months later, they took a free-recall clinical application test on all four topics. Results Repeated testing led to better long-term retention and application than repeatedly studying the material (p<0.0001, 2=0.33). Repeated generation of self-explanations also improved long-term retention and application, but the effect was smaller (p<0.0001, 2=0.08). When data were collapsed across topics, both testing conditions produced better final test performance than studying with self-explanation (TE=40%>SE=29% [p=0.001, d=0.70]; T=36%>SE=29% [p=0.02, d=0.48]). Studying with self-explanation led to better retention and application than studying without self-explanation (SE=29%>S=20%; p=0.001, d=0.68). Our analyses showed significant interaction by topic (p=0.001, 2=0.06), indicating some variation in the effectiveness of the interventions among topics. Conclusions Testing and generating self-explanations are both learning activities that can be used to produce superior long-term retention and application of knowledge, but testing is generally more effective than self-explanation alone.
引用
收藏
页码:674 / 682
页数:9
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Influences on medical students' self-regulated learning after test completion [J].
Agrawal, Sacha ;
Norman, Geoffrey R. ;
Eva, Kevin W. .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2012, 46 (03) :326-335
[2]   METACOGNITIVE EXPERIENCE AND TRANSFER OF LOGICAL REASONING [J].
BERRY, DC .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY SECTION A-HUMAN EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1983, 35 (FEB) :39-49
[3]   Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment [J].
Biggs, J .
HIGHER EDUCATION, 1996, 32 (03) :347-364
[4]  
Bjork RA., 1994, Metacognition: Knowing about knowing, P185, DOI DOI 10.7551/MITPRESS/4561.003.0011
[5]   Repeated Testing Produces Superior Transfer of Learning Relative to Repeated Studying [J].
Butler, Andrew C. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2010, 36 (05) :1118-1133
[6]   Using Tests to Enhance 8th Grade Students' Retention of US History Facts [J].
Carpenter, Shana K. ;
Pashler, Harold ;
Cepeda, Nicholas J. .
APPLIED COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 23 (06) :760-771
[7]  
CHI MTH, 1994, COGNITIVE SCI, V18, P439, DOI 10.1016/0364-0213(94)90016-7
[8]  
Duffy T.M., 1996, HDB RES ED COMMUNICA
[9]   Improving Students' Learning With Effective Learning Techniques: Promising Directions From Cognitive and Educational Psychology [J].
Dunlosky, John ;
Rawson, Katherine A. ;
Marsh, Elizabeth J. ;
Nathan, Mitchell J. ;
Willingham, Daniel T. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST, 2013, 14 (01) :4-58
[10]   A Testing Effect With Multimedia Learning [J].
Johnson, Cheryl I. ;
Mayer, Richard E. .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 101 (03) :621-629