Chromatic contrast thresholds as a prognostic test for visual improvement after macular hole surgery - Color vision and macular hole surgery outcome

被引:4
|
作者
Poon, WKM
Ong, GL
Ripley, LG
Casswell, AG
机构
[1] Sussex Eye Hosp, Vis Res Dept, Brighton BN2 5BF, E Sussex, England
[2] Univ Sussex, Biomed Engn Div, Brighton, E Sussex, England
来源
RETINA-THE JOURNAL OF RETINAL AND VITREOUS DISEASES | 2001年 / 21卷 / 06期
关键词
chromatic contrast thresholds; color vision; macular hole surgery; visual improvement; visual acuity;
D O I
10.1097/00006982-200112000-00009
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the relationship between preoperative chromatic contrast thresholds, postoperative visual acuities (VA), and visual improvement after macular hole surgery. Methods: A consecutive series of patients with Stage II to IV macular holes was studied before macular hole surgery. Preoperative chromatic contrast thresholds, VA, and reading acuity were analyzed in relation to the postoperative visual function. The chromatic contrast thresholds were measured using a computerized cathode ray tube-based system along red-green and tritan confusion axes. Results: Preoperative and postoperative chromatic contrast thresholds were elevated significantly in affected eyes (P < 0.001). Preoperative VA showed a strong correlation with postoperative VA (r = 0.66, P < 0.001) but a weak correlation with visual improvement (r = -0.33, P = 0.03). Red-green contrast threshold correlated strongly with both the distance visual improvement (r = -0.77, P < 0.001) and reading visual improvement (r = -0.61, P < 0.001). Tritan contrast threshold, however, showed a slightly weaker correlation (distance: r = -0.63, P < 0.001; reading: r = -0.47, P < 0.005). Conclusions. These results suggest that chromatic contrast thresholds, especially the red-green contrast threshold, represent a better prognostic guide for visual improvement after macular hole surgery than VA measurement.
引用
收藏
页码:619 / 626
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Morphological Prognostic Factors of Postoperative Visual Outcome in Idiopathic Macular Hole Surgery
    Jung, J.
    Kim, K.
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2010, 51 (13)
  • [2] Visual Outcomes of Macular Hole Surgery
    Khaqan, Hussain Ahmad
    Lubna
    Jameel, Farrukh
    Muhammad
    JCPSP-JOURNAL OF THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS PAKISTAN, 2016, 26 (10): : 839 - 842
  • [3] Visual function assessment and metamorphopsia after macular hole surgery
    Wittich, W
    Overbury, O
    Kapusta, MA
    Faubert, J
    OPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, 2005, 25 (06) : 534 - 542
  • [4] Cone implicit time as a predictor of visual outcome in macular hole surgery
    Sten Andréasson
    Fredrik Ghosh
    Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 2014, 252 : 1903 - 1909
  • [5] Cone implicit time as a predictor of visual outcome in macular hole surgery
    Andreasson, Sten
    Ghosh, Fredrik
    GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2014, 252 (12) : 1903 - 1909
  • [6] To posture or not to posture after macular hole surgery
    Dhawahir-Scala, Felipe Eduardo
    Maino, Anna
    Saha, Konal
    Mokashi, Aashish A.
    McLauchlan, Rita
    Charles, Steven
    RETINA-THE JOURNAL OF RETINAL AND VITREOUS DISEASES, 2008, 28 (01): : 60 - 65
  • [7] AGE-RELATED CLINICAL OUTCOME AFTER MACULAR HOLE SURGERY
    Kim, Yonguk
    Suk, Eung
    Yu, Seung-Young
    Kwak, Hyung Woo
    RETINA-THE JOURNAL OF RETINAL AND VITREOUS DISEASES, 2017, 37 (01): : 80 - 87
  • [8] Prognosis of macular hole surgery
    Mester, U
    Becker, M
    OPHTHALMOLOGE, 1998, 95 (03): : 158 - 162
  • [9] Effects of Indocyanine Green Staining on the Recovery of Visual Acuity and Macular Morphology after Macular Hole Surgery
    Shiono, Akira
    Kogo, Jiro
    Klose, Gerd
    Ueno, Satoki
    Takagi, Hitoshi
    OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2013, 230 (03) : 138 - 143
  • [10] Vanishing visual field defect that had appeared after macular hole surgery
    Fardin, B
    Weissgold, DJ
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY-JOURNAL CANADIEN D OPHTALMOLOGIE, 2003, 38 (04): : 306 - 307