Therapeutic outcomes of non-grafted and platelet concentrations-grafted transcrestal maxillary sinus elevation (TSFE): a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:13
|
作者
Guo, Tianqi [1 ]
Gulati, Karan [1 ]
Shen, Ziyun [2 ,3 ]
Han, Pingping [1 ]
Fan, Zhen [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Dent, Herston, Qld 4006, Australia
[2] Shanghai Engn Res Ctr Tooth Restorat & Regenerat, Shanghai 200072, Peoples R China
[3] Tongji Univ, Sch & Hosp Stomatol, Dept Oral Implant, Shanghai 200072, Peoples R China
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
SIMULTANEOUS IMPLANT PLACEMENT; RICH FIBRIN PRF; FLOOR ELEVATION; BONE-GRAFTS; OSTEOTOME TECHNIQUE; MEMBRANE ELEVATION; ATROPHIC SINUSES; SURVIVAL RATE; PLASMA; LIFT;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-020-62407-y
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
To evaluate and compare the stability, quantity and quality of bone augmentation at maxillary sinus elevation sites by non-grafted transcrestal sinus floor elevation (TSFE) and platelet concentration grafted transcrestal sinus floor elevation (PC-TSFE). A complete literature search was performed up to April 2019. Clinical controlled trials, retrospective cohort studies, and prospective cohort studies were selected based on inclusion criteria. The clinical outcomes were implant survival rate (ISR), marginal/crestal bone loss (MBL/CBL) and endo-sinus bone gain (ESBG). Meta-analysis was conducted on these 1-year based values. Furthermore, another meta-analysis on 1-year ISR value was conducted among studies with different residual bone heights (RBH) within the non-grafted TSFE group. A total of 18 studies were included: 13 in TSFE group and 5 in PC-TSFE group. No significant differences were displayed between the 1-year ISR of TSFE (97%, 95%CI = 0.96-0.99) and PC-TSFE group (99%, 95%CI = 0.97-1.00). Among the various studies with different RBH within TSFE group, no significant differences in 1-year ISR were displayed. The 1-year MBL/CBL value of PC-TSFE group (0.73 mm, 95%CI = 0.43-1.13 mm) did not show significant difference as compared to TSFE group (0.60 mm, 95%CI = 0.10-1.10 mm). Furthermore, no significant enhancement was observed on 1-year ESBG value on PC-TSFE group (3.51 mm, 95%CI = 2.31-4.71 mm) in comparison with the TSFE group (2.87 mm, 95%CI = 2.18m-3.55 mm). Grafting platelet concentrations around dental implants at TSFE sites did not significantly enhance the adjacent bone regeneration. Moreover, TSFE was shown to be a reliable therapeutic option for implant sites that need simultaneous maxillary sinus augmentation, even under limited RBH.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The impact of deproteinized bovine bone particle size on histological outcomes in sinus floor elevation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xin Li
    Shi-chen Lin
    Shao-yu Duan
    International Journal of Implant Dentistry, 9
  • [32] Long-term effectiveness of maxillary sinus floor augmentation: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Raghoebar, Gerry M.
    Onclin, Pieter
    Boven, G. Carina
    Vissink, Arjan
    Meijer, Henny J. A.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2019, 46 : 307 - 318
  • [33] Systematic Review The effectiveness of non-surgical maxillary expansion: a meta-analysis
    Zhou, Yang
    Long, Hu
    Ye, Niansong
    Xue, Junjie
    Yang, Xin
    Liao, Lina
    Lai, Wenli
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2014, 36 (02) : 233 - 242
  • [34] Therapeutic Options and Outcomes in Midaortic Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Cortenbach, Kimberley R. G.
    Yosofi, Bahram
    Rodwell, Laura
    Meek, Jelena
    Patel, Ritesh
    Prakash, Siddharth K.
    Riksen, Niels P.
    Jenniskens, Sjoerd F. M.
    Dirven, Mark
    DeRuiter, Marco C.
    van Kimmenade, Roland R. J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2023, 65 (01) : 120 - 130
  • [35] Evaluation of Different Approaches for Sinus Membrane Perforation Repair During Sinus Elevation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Soares, Lelio Fernando Ferreira
    de Almeida Malzoni, Carolina Mendonca
    da Silveira, Marcela lunes
    Marcantonio Jr, Elcio
    Pigossi, Suzane Cristina
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2024, 39 (01) : 107 - 118
  • [36] Clinical evaluation of maxillary sinus floor elevation with or without bone grafts: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials with trial sequential analysis
    Chen, Jiayi
    Lu, Yiping
    Xu, Jin
    Hua, Zhen
    ARCHIVES OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 20 (02) : 384 - 401
  • [37] Piezoelectric Surgery vs Rotary Instruments for Lateral Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Intra- and Postoperative Complications
    Atieh, Momen A.
    Alsabeeha, Nabeel H. M.
    Tawse-Smith, Andrew
    Faggion, Clovis M., Jr.
    Duncan, Warwick J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2015, 30 (06) : 1262 - 1271
  • [38] Short implants as an alternative to sinus lift for the rehabilitation of posterior maxillary atrophies: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mokcheh, A.
    Jegham, H.
    Turki, S.
    JOURNAL OF STOMATOLOGY ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2019, 120 (01) : 28 - 37
  • [39] Accuracy of panoramic radiography in diagnosing maxillary sinus-root relationship: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sun, Wentian
    Xia, Kai
    Tang, Li
    Liu, Chenlu
    Zou, Ling
    Liu, Jun
    ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2018, 88 (06) : 819 - 829
  • [40] Is the volume of the maxillary sinus altered after LeFort I orthognathic surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Othman, Ahmad
    AlQahtani, Feras AlMofreh
    Kuriadom, Sam
    Ahmed, Syed Waheed
    AlMutairi, Faris
    AlAnzy, Hamedy
    AlAssiri, Nasser
    JOURNAL OF STOMATOLOGY ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2023, 124 (01)