Therapeutic outcomes of non-grafted and platelet concentrations-grafted transcrestal maxillary sinus elevation (TSFE): a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:13
|
作者
Guo, Tianqi [1 ]
Gulati, Karan [1 ]
Shen, Ziyun [2 ,3 ]
Han, Pingping [1 ]
Fan, Zhen [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Dent, Herston, Qld 4006, Australia
[2] Shanghai Engn Res Ctr Tooth Restorat & Regenerat, Shanghai 200072, Peoples R China
[3] Tongji Univ, Sch & Hosp Stomatol, Dept Oral Implant, Shanghai 200072, Peoples R China
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
SIMULTANEOUS IMPLANT PLACEMENT; RICH FIBRIN PRF; FLOOR ELEVATION; BONE-GRAFTS; OSTEOTOME TECHNIQUE; MEMBRANE ELEVATION; ATROPHIC SINUSES; SURVIVAL RATE; PLASMA; LIFT;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-020-62407-y
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
To evaluate and compare the stability, quantity and quality of bone augmentation at maxillary sinus elevation sites by non-grafted transcrestal sinus floor elevation (TSFE) and platelet concentration grafted transcrestal sinus floor elevation (PC-TSFE). A complete literature search was performed up to April 2019. Clinical controlled trials, retrospective cohort studies, and prospective cohort studies were selected based on inclusion criteria. The clinical outcomes were implant survival rate (ISR), marginal/crestal bone loss (MBL/CBL) and endo-sinus bone gain (ESBG). Meta-analysis was conducted on these 1-year based values. Furthermore, another meta-analysis on 1-year ISR value was conducted among studies with different residual bone heights (RBH) within the non-grafted TSFE group. A total of 18 studies were included: 13 in TSFE group and 5 in PC-TSFE group. No significant differences were displayed between the 1-year ISR of TSFE (97%, 95%CI = 0.96-0.99) and PC-TSFE group (99%, 95%CI = 0.97-1.00). Among the various studies with different RBH within TSFE group, no significant differences in 1-year ISR were displayed. The 1-year MBL/CBL value of PC-TSFE group (0.73 mm, 95%CI = 0.43-1.13 mm) did not show significant difference as compared to TSFE group (0.60 mm, 95%CI = 0.10-1.10 mm). Furthermore, no significant enhancement was observed on 1-year ESBG value on PC-TSFE group (3.51 mm, 95%CI = 2.31-4.71 mm) in comparison with the TSFE group (2.87 mm, 95%CI = 2.18m-3.55 mm). Grafting platelet concentrations around dental implants at TSFE sites did not significantly enhance the adjacent bone regeneration. Moreover, TSFE was shown to be a reliable therapeutic option for implant sites that need simultaneous maxillary sinus augmentation, even under limited RBH.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Therapeutic outcomes of non-grafted and platelet concentrations-grafted transcrestal maxillary sinus elevation (TSFE): a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tianqi Guo
    Karan Gulati
    Ziyun Shen
    Pingping Han
    Zhen Fan
    Scientific Reports, 10
  • [2] Clinical outcomes of implants placed with transcrestal maxillary sinus elevation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kadkhodazadeh, Mahdi
    Alimardani, Yasmin
    Azadi, Ali
    Daneshvar, Alireza
    Amid, Reza
    Khaleghi, Armin
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2024, 62 (08): : 685 - 703
  • [3] Risk of early implant failure in grafted and non-grafted sites: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Clauser, Tommaso
    Lin, Guo-Hao
    Lee, Eric
    Del Fabbro, Massimo
    Wang, Horn-Lay
    Testori, Tiziano
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2022, 15 (01) : 31 - 41
  • [4] Non-grafted versus grafted sinus lift procedures for implantation in the atrophic maxilla: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Lie, S. A. N.
    Claessen, R. M. M. A.
    Leung, C. A. W.
    Merten, H. -A.
    Kessler, P. A. W. H.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2022, 51 (01) : 122 - 132
  • [5] Long-Term Survival of Dental Implants Placed in the Grafted Maxillary Sinus: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Treatment Modalities
    Duttenhoefer, Fabian
    Souren, Cyriel
    Menne, Dieter
    Emmerich, Dominik
    Schoen, Ralf
    Sauerbier, Sebastian
    PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (09):
  • [6] Graft-Free Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Duan, Deng-Hui
    Fu, Jia-Hui
    Qi, Wei
    Du, Yi
    Pan, Jie
    Wang, Hom-Lay
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2017, 88 (06) : 550 - 564
  • [7] The survival rate of transcrestal sinus floor elevation combined with short implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies
    Lin, Zhe-Zhen
    Jiao, Yan-Qing
    Ye, Zhang-Yan
    Wang, Ge-Ge
    Ding, Xi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2021, 7 (01)
  • [8] The survival rate of transcrestal sinus floor elevation combined with short implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies
    Zhe-Zhen Lin
    Yan-Qing Jiao
    Zhang-Yan Ye
    Ge-Ge Wang
    Xi Ding
    International Journal of Implant Dentistry, 7
  • [9] Prevalence of maxillary sinus septa: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Henriques, I.
    Carames, J.
    Francisco, H.
    Carames, G.
    Hernandez-Alfaro, F.
    Marques, D.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2022, 51 (06) : 823 - 831
  • [10] A review of survival rates for implants placed in grafted maxillary sinuses using meta-analysis
    Tong, DC
    Rioux, K
    Drangsholt, M
    Beirne, OR
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 1998, 13 (02) : 175 - 182