A life cycle framework to support materials selection for Ecodesign: A case study on biodegradable polymers

被引:37
作者
Ribeiro, I. [1 ]
Pecas, P. [1 ]
Henriques, E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tecn Lisboa, Inst Super Tecn, IDMEC, P-1049001 Lisbon, Portugal
关键词
Ecodesign; Materials selection; Process-based cost models; Life cycle cost; Life cycle assessment; Biodegradable polymers; ENVIRONMENTAL-IMPACT; EXISTING PET; PLASTICS; DESIGN; PLA; PS;
D O I
10.1016/j.matdes.2013.04.043
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Nowadays society compels designers to develop more sustainable products. Ecodesign directs product design towards the goal of reducing environmental impacts. Within Ecodesign, materials selection plays a major role on product cost and environmental performance throughout its life cycle. This paper proposes a comprehensive life cycle framework to support Ecodesign in material selection. Dealing with new materials and technologies in early design stages, process-based models are used to represent the whole life cycle and supply integrated data to assess material alternatives, considering cost and environmental dimensions. An integrated analysis is then proposed to support decision making by mapping the best alternative materials according to the importance given to upstream and downstream life phases and to the environmental impacts. The proposed framework is applied to compare the life cycle performance of injection moulded samples made of four commercial biodegradable polymers with different contents of Thermo Plasticized Starch and PolyLactic Acid and a common fossil based polymer, Polypropylene. Instead of labelling materials just as "green", the need to fully capture all impacts in the whole life cycle was shown. The fossil based polymer is the best economic alternative, but polymers with higher content of Thermo Plasticized Starch have a better environmental performance. However, parts geometry and EoL scenarios play a major role on the life cycle performance of candidate materials. The selection decision is then supported by mapping the alternatives. (c) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:300 / 308
页数:9
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Eco-efficiency and ecodesign in electrical and electronic products
    Aoe, Taeko
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2007, 15 (15) : 1406 - 1414
  • [2] Realizing the environmental impact of soft materials: Criteria for utilization and design specification
    Araji, Mohamad T.
    Shakour, Sadeka Abdel
    [J]. MATERIALS & DESIGN, 2013, 43 : 560 - 571
  • [3] Ashby RF, 2001, PROG MATER SCI, V46, P191
  • [4] Evaluation of oriented poly(lactide) polymers vs. existing PET and oriented PS for fresh food service containers
    Auras, RA
    Singh, SP
    Singh, JJ
    [J]. PACKAGING TECHNOLOGY AND SCIENCE, 2005, 18 (04) : 207 - 216
  • [5] Performance evaluation of PLA against existing PET and PS containers
    Auras, Rafael
    Singh, Sher Paul
    Singh, Jagjit
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TESTING AND EVALUATION, 2006, 34 (06) : 530 - 536
  • [6] Novel toughened polylactic acid nanocomposite: Mechanical, thermal and morphological properties
    Balakrishnan, Harintharavimal
    Hassan, Azman
    Wahit, Mat Uzir
    Yussuf, A. A.
    Razak, Shamsul Bahri Abdul
    [J]. MATERIALS & DESIGN, 2010, 31 (07) : 3289 - 3298
  • [7] Integrating fuzzy multicriteria analysis and uncertainty evaluation in life cycle assessment
    Benetto, Enrico
    Dujet, Christiane
    Rousseaux, Patrick
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2008, 23 (12) : 1461 - 1467
  • [8] The soft side of ecodesign
    Boks, Casper
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2006, 14 (15-16) : 1346 - 1356
  • [9] Bras B., 1996, DESIGNING LIFE CYCLE
  • [10] *EPA, 1992, LIF CYCL DES GUID MA