CORRELATION BETWEEN HETEROGENEOUS KNOWLEDGE AND TECHNOLOGICAL CAPABILITY

被引:0
|
作者
Xu, Hao [1 ]
Wu, Tung-Ju [2 ]
Yu, Chuan-Peng [3 ]
机构
[1] S China Univ Technol, Sch Software Engn, Guandzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Huaqiao Univ, Coll Business Adm, Quanzhou 362021, Peoples R China
[3] S China Univ Technol, Sch Econ & Commerce, Guandzhou, Peoples R China
来源
OXIDATION COMMUNICATIONS | 2015年 / 38卷 / 2A期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
heterogeneous knowledge; exploitative learning; technological capability; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; INNOVATION PERFORMANCE; NETWORKS; EXPLOITATION; COOPERATION; EXPLORATION; ALLIANCES;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Acquiring external knowledge, which is internally rare in an enterprise, has been an urgent problem for corporate knowledge and innovation management, especially for science and technology of small and middle enterprises (SMEs) with few scientific research funds. Blind knowledge acquisition could result in heavy R&D costs as well as integration difficulty of internal and external knowledge in an enterprise. Both external knowledge networks and organisational learning behaviours are the key factors in corporate technological capability. However, past research did not discuss knowledge networks and the effects from the aspect of knowledge, especially not on investigated science and technology SMEs, with exploitative learning as the mediator. For this reason, science and technology SMEs are selected as the research subjects, and questionnaire survey is utilised for collecting 278 valid samples in Shunde district in the Guangdong province, China. Structural equation modelling is further applied to verify the hypotheses. The research findings show the partial effects of supply chain knowledge source and science and technology knowledge source on technological capability with the mediating effects of exploitative learning, while competitor knowledge source could not significantly promote technological capability nor affect exploitative learning.
引用
收藏
页码:1131 / 1141
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [42] A Review of Technological Capability and Performance Relationship in Manufacturing Companies
    Ahmad, Nurazwa
    Othman, Siti Norezam
    Lazim, Halim Mad
    2014 1ST INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT AND EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES (ISTMET 2014), 2014, : 193 - 198
  • [43] Technological capability, relational capability and firms' performance: The role of learning capability
    Salisu, Yakubu
    Abu Bakar, Lily Julienti
    REGE-REVISTA DE GESTAO, 2020, 27 (01): : 79 - 99
  • [44] Social Learning in Cluster Organizations and Accumulation of Technological Capability
    Rozkwitalska, Malgorzata
    Lis, Anna Maria
    INZINERINE EKONOMIKA-ENGINEERING ECONOMICS, 2022, 33 (04): : 372 - 385
  • [45] Technological Strategies and Quality of Invention: The Role of Knowledge Base and Technical Applications
    Cammarano, Antonello
    Michelino, Francesca
    Vitale, Maria Prosperina
    La Rocca, Michele
    Caputo, Mauro
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2022, 69 (04) : 1050 - 1066
  • [46] Balancing knowledge exploration and exploitation within and across technological and geographical domains
    Petruzzelli, Antonio Messeni
    KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT RESEARCH & PRACTICE, 2014, 12 (02) : 123 - 132
  • [47] Technological breadth and depth of knowledge in innovation: the role of mergers and acquisitions in biotech
    Lodh, Suman
    Battaggion, Maria Rosa
    INDUSTRIAL AND CORPORATE CHANGE, 2015, 24 (02) : 383 - 415
  • [48] Knowledge transfer in technological innovation clusters
    Simoes Fioravanti, Vania Lopes
    Stocker, Fabricio
    Macau, Flavio
    INNOVATION & MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2023, 20 (01) : 43 - 59
  • [49] Keeping Pace with Technological Change: Insights into the Recency of Internal Knowledge Inputs
    Papazoglou, Michalis E.
    Nelles, Jen
    JOURNAL OF THE KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY, 2023, 14 (04) : 3724 - 3740
  • [50] Technological dynamics and social capability: US states and European nations
    Fagerberg, Jan
    Feldman, Maryann P.
    Srholec, Martin
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHY, 2014, 14 (02) : 313 - 337