Optimal selection of retailers for a manufacturing vendor in a vendor managed inventory system

被引:36
作者
Yu, Yugang [2 ,3 ]
Hong, Zhaofu [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Linda L. [4 ]
Liang, Liang [3 ]
Chu, Chengbin [1 ]
机构
[1] Ecole Cent Paris, Lab Genie Ind, Paris, France
[2] Lanzhou Univ, Sch Management, Lanzhou 730000, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Sci & Technol China, Sch Management, Hefei 230026, Peoples R China
[4] Catholic Univ Lille, IESEG Sch Management LEM CNRS, Lille, France
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Supply chain management; Vendor managed inventory; Retailer selection; Stackelberg game theory; Hybrid algorithm; SUPPLIER SELECTION; STACKELBERG GAME; TOTAL-COST; MODEL; POLICIES; DEMAND;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejor.2012.09.044
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
A Vendor Managed Inventory (VMI) system consists of a manufacturing vendor and a number of retailers. In such a system, it is essential for the vendor to optimally determine retailer selection and other related decisions, such as the product's replenishment cycle time and the wholesale price, in order to maximize his profit. Meanwhile, each retailer's decisions on her willingness to enter the system and retail price are simultaneously considered in the retailer selection process. However, the above interactive decision making is complex and the available studies on interactive retailer selection are scarce. In this study, we formulate the retailer selection problem as a Stackelberg game model to help the manufacturer, as a vendor, optimally select his retailers to form a VMI system. This model is non-linear, mixed-integer, game-theoretic, and analytically intractable. Therefore, we further develop a hybrid algorithm for effectively and efficiently solving the developed model. The hybrid algorithm combines dynamic programming (DP), genetic algorithm (GA) and analytical methods. As demonstrated by our numerical studies, the optimal retailer selection can increase the manufacturer's profit by up to 90% and the selected retailers' profits significantly compared to non-selection strategy. The proposed hybrid algorithm can solve the model within a minute for a problem with 100 candidate retailers, whereas a pure GA has to take more than 1 h to solve a small sized problem of 20 candidate retailers achieving an objective value no worse than that obtained by the hybrid algorithm. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:273 / 284
页数:12
相关论文
共 46 条
[21]   Optimizing whole supply chain benefit versus buyer's benefit through supplier selection [J].
Kheljani, J. Gheidar ;
Ghodsypour, S. H. ;
O'Brien, C. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2009, 121 (02) :482-493
[22]  
Koza J. R., 2005, SEARCH METHODOLOGIES, P127, DOI DOI 10.1007/0-387-28356-0_5
[23]   GENETIC ALGORITHMS AS A STRATEGY FOR FEATURE-SELECTION [J].
LEARDI, R ;
BOGGIA, R ;
TERRILE, M .
JOURNAL OF CHEMOMETRICS, 1992, 6 (05) :267-281
[24]   Selection of contract suppliers under price and demand uncertainty in a dynamic market [J].
Li, Shanling ;
Murat, Alper ;
Huang, Wanzhen .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2009, 198 (03) :830-847
[25]   Stackelberg-Nash equilibrium for multilevel programming with multiple followers using genetic algorithms [J].
Liu, BD .
COMPUTERS & MATHEMATICS WITH APPLICATIONS, 1998, 36 (07) :79-89
[26]   The supplier selection problem with quantity discounts and truckload shipping [J].
Mansini, Renata ;
Savelsbergh, Martin W. P. ;
Tocchella, Barbara .
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2012, 40 (04) :445-455
[27]   A serial inventory system with supplier selection and order quantity allocation [J].
Mendoza, Abraham ;
Ventura, Jose A. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2010, 207 (03) :1304-1315
[28]   A framework for facilitating sourcing and allocation decisions for make-to-order items [J].
Murthy, NN ;
Soni, S ;
Ghosh, S .
DECISION SCIENCES, 2004, 35 (04) :609-637
[29]  
Netessine S, 2004, INT SER OPER RES MAN, V74, P607
[30]   An efficient and simple model for multiple criteria supplier selection problem [J].
Ng, Wan Lung .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2008, 186 (03) :1059-1067