The effect of multiplicity of PI-RADS 3 lesions on cancer detection rate of confirmatory targeted biopsy in patients diagnosed with prostate cancer and managed with active surveillance

被引:4
|
作者
Yaguchi, Grace [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Tang, Hoang J. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Deebajah, Mustafa [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Keeley, Jacob [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Pantelic, Milan [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Williamson, Sean [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Gupta, Nilesh [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Peabody, James O. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Menon, Mani [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Dabaja, Ali [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Alanee, Shaheen [2 ]
机构
[1] Henry Ford Hlth Syst, Detroit, MI USA
[2] Detroit Med Ctr, Detroit, MI 48201 USA
[3] Henry Ford Hlth Syst, Vattikuti Urol Inst, Detroit, MI USA
[4] Henry Ford Hlth Syst, Dept Pathol, Detroit, MI USA
关键词
PI-RADS; 3; lesion; MRI; Confirmatory targeted biopsy; Prostate cancer; Cancer detection rate; GRADE; RISK; PCA3;
D O I
10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.03.002
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and Objective: To determine the effect of multiplicity of prostate imaging reporting and data system assessment category 3 (PI-RADS 3) lesions on cancer detection rate (CDR) of confirmatory targeted biopsy of such lesion in patients diagnosed with prostate cancer and managed with active surveillance. Methods: This study was conducted at a single academic institution. There were 91 men with >= 1 PI-RADS 3 lesion detected through magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after systematic prostate biopsy in the course of management of patients diagnosed with prostate cancer with active surveillance. We compared the CDRs based on targeted biopsy of PI-RADS 3 lesions that occurred (1) as solitary lesions, (2) as 1 of multiple PI-RADS 3 only lesions, or (3) with >= 1 higher grade lesion. Results: Median age was 65.0 years (interquartile range 59.5-70.0), median prostate specific antigen was 5.95 ng/ml (interquartile range 4.30-8.83), and median prostate specific antigen density was 0.161 ng/ml(2) (0.071-0.194). Forty-three men had solitary PI-RADS 3 lesions, 22 had multiple PI-RADS 3 only lesions, and 26 had multiple lesions with >= 1 higher grade lesion. The overall CDR (Gleason score >= 3 + 3) based on confirmatory MRI targeted biopsy in a given PI-RADS 3 lesion in each group was 23%, 45%, and 54%, respectively (P = 0.0274). The CDRs for clinically significant disease (Gleason score >= 3 + 4) were 16%, 32%, and 35%, respectively (P = 0.1701). Conclusions: Coexisting lesions increase the CDR of confirmatory MRI targeted biopsy of PI-RADS 3 lesions in patients managed with active surveillance. Risk stratification algorithms for PI-RADS 3 lesion to guide biopsy and management decisions may consider including multiplicity of lesions. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:599.e9 / 599.e13
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The detection of significant prostate cancer is correlated with the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) in MRI/transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsy
    Cash, Hannes
    Maxeiner, Andreas
    Stephan, Carsten
    Fischer, Thomas
    Durmus, Tahir
    Holzmann, Josephine
    Asbach, Patrick
    Haas, Matthias
    Hinz, Stefan
    Neymeyer, Joerg
    Miller, Kurt
    Guenzel, Karsten
    Kempkensteffen, Carsten
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 34 (04) : 525 - 532
  • [32] The use of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT to stratify patients with PI-RADS 3 lesions according to clinically significant prostate cancer risk
    Yang, Jinhui
    Tang, Yongxiang
    Zhou, Chuanchi
    Zhou, Ming
    Li, Jian
    Hu, Shuo
    PROSTATE, 2023, 83 (05) : 430 - 439
  • [33] MR-sequences for prostate cancer diagnostics: validation based on the PI-RADS scoring system and targeted MR-guided in-bore biopsy
    Schimmoeller, Lars
    Quentin, Michael
    Arsov, Christian
    Hiester, Andreas
    Buchbender, Christian
    Rabenalt, Robert
    Albers, Peter
    Antoch, Gerald
    Blondin, Dirk
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2014, 24 (10) : 2582 - 2589
  • [34] MR-sequences for prostate cancer diagnostics: validation based on the PI-RADS scoring system and targeted MR-guided in-bore biopsy
    Lars Schimmöller
    Michael Quentin
    Christian Arsov
    Andreas Hiester
    Christian Buchbender
    Robert Rabenalt
    Peter Albers
    Gerald Antoch
    Dirk Blondin
    European Radiology, 2014, 24 : 2582 - 2589
  • [35] Development and Validation of a Radiomics Nomogram for Predicting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in PI-RADS 3 Lesions
    Li, Tianping
    Sun, Linna
    Li, Qinghe
    Luo, Xunrong
    Luo, Mingfang
    Xie, Haizhu
    Wang, Peiyuan
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 11
  • [36] The predictive impact of hematological inflammatory markers in detecting prostate cancer in patients with PI-RADS 3 lesions on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging
    Kayar, Ridvan
    Tokuc, Emre
    Ozsoy, Emrah
    Demir, Samet
    Kayar, Kemal
    Topaktas, Ramazan
    Demir, Selamettin
    Ozturk, Metin
    PROSTATE, 2024, 84 (13) : 1244 - 1250
  • [37] PI-RADS 3 lesions: Does the association of the lesion volume with the prostate-specific antigen density matter in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer?
    Rico, Luis
    Blas, Leandro
    Vitagliano, Gonzalo
    Contreras, Pablo
    Pita, Hernando Rios
    Ameri, Carlos
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2021, 39 (07) : 431.e9 - 431.e13
  • [38] Does Size Matter? A Retrospective Study Analysing the Size of PI-RADS 4 Lesions and Its Associated Prostate Cancer Positivity with Transperineal Prostate Biopsy
    Hooshyari, Ali
    Scholtz, David
    Maoate, Keu
    Robertson, Samuel
    Vermeulen, Lodewikus Petrus
    De Andrade, Luiz Gustavo Modelli
    Kawano, Paulo Roberto
    Gilling, Peter
    Fraundorfer, Mark
    Ordones, Flavio Vasconcelos
    RESEARCH AND REPORTS IN UROLOGY, 2025, 17 : 49 - 57
  • [39] Biparametric MRI-based radiomics for prediction of clinically significant prostate cancer of PI-RADS category 3 lesions
    Lu, Feng
    Zhao, Yanjun
    Wang, Zhongjuan
    Feng, Ninghan
    BMC CANCER, 2025, 25 (01)
  • [40] Biparametric vs. Multiparametric MRI in the Detection of Cancer in Transperineal Targeted-Biopsy-Proven Peripheral Prostate Cancer Lesions Classified as PI-RADS Score 3 or 3+1: The Added Value of ADC Quantification
    Bertelli, Elena
    Vizzi, Michele
    Marzi, Chiara
    Pastacaldi, Sandro
    Cinelli, Alberto
    Legato, Martina
    Ruzga, Ron
    Bardazzi, Federico
    Valoriani, Vittoria
    Loverre, Francesco
    Impagliazzo, Francesco
    Cozzi, Diletta
    Nardoni, Samuele
    Facchiano, Davide
    Serni, Sergio
    Masieri, Lorenzo
    Minervini, Andrea
    Agostini, Simone
    Miele, Vittorio
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2024, 14 (15)