Tuning characteristics of the top-down attentional setting

被引:0
|
作者
Chua, Fook K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Psychol, Singapore 119260, Singapore
关键词
Selective attention; Attentional capture; VISUAL-SEARCH; ABRUPT ONSETS; POP-OUT; CAPTURE; COLOR; CONTINGENT; SELECTIVITY; SINGLETONS; GUIDANCE; SALIENCE;
D O I
10.3758/s13414-012-0414-9
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Previous studies of top-down attentional guidance have focused generally on the attentional prioritization of a single target feature. The present study focused on how the attentional system would be configured when the target possesses several unique features. These features were perfectly correlated, which meant that monitoring just one of them would be an adequate strategy. The experiments addressed the following questions: (a) If the target is a singleton, would the attentional system be set to monitor the target's unique features, or would the search strategy default to singleton detection? (b) Can the target's static and dynamic features be prioritized simultaneously? (c) Are all of the target's features prioritized, or only those features that are diagnostic of targethood? The results revealed an attentional system that can be flexibly tuned to multiple target features across static and dynamic dimensions. This system can simultaneously be narrowly tuned to monitor a specific target feature and broadly tuned to detect singletons. Finally, the attentional system monitors only those features that are diagnostic of targethood.
引用
收藏
页码:440 / 455
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Which processes dominate visual search: Bottom-up feature contrast, top-down tuning or trial history?
    Becker, Stefanie I.
    Grubert, Anna
    Horstmann, Gernot
    Ansorge, Ulrich
    COGNITION, 2023, 236
  • [42] Top-down matching singleton cues have no edge over top-down matching nonsingletons in spatial cueing
    Schoeberl, Tobias
    Goller, Florian
    Ansorge, Ulrich
    PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2019, 26 (01) : 241 - 249
  • [43] On the Temporal Relation of Top-Down and Bottom-Up Mechanisms during Guidance of Attention
    Wykowska, Agnieszka
    Schuboe, Anna
    JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2010, 22 (04) : 640 - 654
  • [44] What does distractibility in ADHD reveal about mechanisms for top-down attentional control?
    Friedman-Hill, Stacia R.
    Wagman, Meryl R.
    Gex, Saskia E.
    Pine, Daniel S.
    Leibenluft, Ellen
    Ungerleider, Leslie G.
    COGNITION, 2010, 115 (01) : 93 - 103
  • [45] Why salience is not enough: Reflections on top-down selection in vision
    Egeth, Howard E.
    Leonard, Carly J.
    Leber, Andrew B.
    ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2010, 135 (02) : 130 - 132
  • [46] Top-down weighting of visual dimensions: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence
    Toellner, Thomas
    Zehetleitner, Michael
    Gramann, Klaus
    Mueller, Hermann J.
    VISION RESEARCH, 2010, 50 (14) : 1372 - 1381
  • [47] Top-down task sets for combined features: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence for two stages in attentional object selection
    Kiss, Monika
    Grubert, Anna
    Eimer, Martin
    ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2013, 75 (02) : 216 - 228
  • [48] THE ROLE OF TOP-DOWN TASK SET FOR ATTENTIONAL CAPTURE IN VISUAL SEARCH
    Kiss, Monika
    Eimer, Martin
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2009, 46 : S104 - S104
  • [49] Priming of Control: Implicit Contextual Cuing of Top-down Attentional Set
    King, Joseph A.
    Korb, Franziska M.
    Egner, Tobias
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2012, 32 (24) : 8192 - 8200
  • [50] Object-based selection modulates top-down attentional shifts
    Nishida, Satoshi
    Shibata, Tomohiro
    Ikeda, Kazushi
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2014, 8