Reconstructing What You Said: Text Inference Using Smartphone Motion

被引:6
|
作者
Hodges, Duncan [1 ]
Buckley, Oliver [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ East Anglia, Sch Comp Sci, Norwich NR4 7TJ, Norfolk, England
[2] Cranfield Univ, Def Acad United Kingdom, Ctr Elect Warfare Informat & Cyber, Swindon SN6 8LA, Wilts, England
关键词
Computer security; computer hacking; keyboards; sensors;
D O I
10.1109/TMC.2018.2850313
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Smartphones and tablets are becoming ubiquitous within our connected lives and as a result these devices are increasingly being used for more and more Smartphones and tablets are becoming ubiquitous within our connected lives and as a result these devices are increasingly being used for more and more sensitive applications, such as banking. The security of the information within these sensitive applications is managed through a variety of different processes, all of which minimise the exposure of this sensitive information to other potentially malicious applications. This paper documents experiments with the 'zero-permission' motion sensors on the device as a side-channel for inferring the text typed into a sensitive application. These sensors are freely accessible without the phone user having to give permission. The research was able to, on average, identify nearly 30 percent of typed bigrams from unseen words, using a very small volume of training data, which was less than the size of a tweet. Given the natural redundancy in language this performance is often enough to understand the phrase being typed. We found that large devices were typically more vulnerable, as were users who held the device in one hand whilst typing with fingers. Of those bigrams which were not correctly identified over 60 percent of the errors involved the space bar and nearly half of the errors are within two keys on the keyboard.
引用
收藏
页码:947 / 959
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] What's that you said-not rebuild New Orleans?
    Wexler-Norton, S
    LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, 2006, 96 (01): : 13 - 13
  • [32] What's that you said sooty? Puppets, parlance and pretence
    Emmison, M
    Goldman, L
    LANGUAGE & COMMUNICATION, 1996, 16 (01) : 17 - 35
  • [33] Keystroke Inference Using Smartphone Kinematics
    Buckley, Oliver
    Hodges, Duncan
    Hadgkiss, Melissa
    Morris, Sarah
    HUMAN ASPECTS OF INFORMATION SECURITY, PRIVACY AND TRUST (HAS 2017), 2017, 10292 : 226 - 238
  • [34] Slurs, neutral counterparts, and what you could have said
    Falbo, Arianna
    ANALYTIC PHILOSOPHY, 2021, 62 (04) : 359 - 375
  • [35] You Said What? Assessing the Impact of Collaboration Technologies and Message Characteristics using Physiological Measures
    Wells, Taylor M.
    Dennis, Alan R.
    2014 47TH HAWAII INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEM SCIENCES (HICSS), 2014, : 442 - 451
  • [36] Automatic Predicate Testing in Formal Certification You've only Proven What You've Said, Not What You Meant!
    Slama, Franck
    TESTS AND PROOFS, TAP 2016, 2016, 9762 : 191 - 198
  • [37] What the Tortoise Said to Achilles: Lewis Carroll's Paradox of Inference
    Besson, Corine
    HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF LOGIC, 2018, 39 (01) : 96 - 98
  • [38] What are you doing while answering your smartphone?
    Abate, Andrea F.
    Nappi, Michele
    Barra, Silvio
    De Marsico, Maria
    2018 24TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PATTERN RECOGNITION (ICPR), 2018, : 3120 - 3125
  • [39] Analysing Qualitative Data You Asked Them, Now What to Do with What They Said
    Willson, Rebekah
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2019 CONFERENCE ON HUMAN INFORMATION INTERACTION AND RETRIEVAL (CHIIR'19), 2019, : 385 - 387
  • [40] The text in its context: what is family for you?
    Rigotti Baltor, Marja Rany
    Menezes Rodrigues, Juliana Stoppa
    Liston Andrade Ferreira, Noeli Marchioro
    Dupas, Giselle
    REVISTA DE PESQUISA-CUIDADO E FUNDAMENTAL ONLINE, 2014, 6 (01): : 293 - 304