Comparing cognitive fusion and cognitive reappraisal as predictors of college student mental health

被引:43
作者
Krafft, Jennifer
Haeger, Jack A.
Levin, Michael E.
机构
关键词
Defusion; cognitive behavior therapy; acceptance and commitment therapy; college student mental health; mindfulness; RUMINATIVE THOUGHT STYLE; COMMITMENT THERAPY; INITIAL VALIDATION; BEHAVIORAL THERAPY; ACCEPTANCE; DEFUSION; STRATEGIES;
D O I
10.1080/16506073.2018.1513556
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Transdiagnostic cognitive behavioral interventions target different cognitive processes to promote mental health, including cognitive fusion and cognitive reappraisal. Determining the relative impact of cognitive fusion and reappraisal on a range of student mental health concerns could help interventions target psychopathological cognitive processes more effectively. Therefore, this study examined the longitudinal impact of cognitive fusion and reappraisal on mental health and functioning outcomes. A series of hierarchical regression models tested the effects of cognitive fusion and reappraisal in a sample of college students (n = 339). When controlling for reappraisal and baseline symptoms, fusion predicted distress, depression, generalized anxiety, social anxiety, hostility, academic distress, and student role problems 1 month later. Reappraisal predicted only student role problems longitudinally when controlling for fusion. These results suggest that cognitive fusion is a stronger predictor than reappraisal for a range of student mental health concerns and may be a particularly important target for improving student mental health.
引用
收藏
页码:241 / 252
页数:12
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Emotion-regulation strategies across psychopathology: A meta-analytic review
    Aldao, Amelia
    Nolen-Hoeksema, Susan
    Schweizer, Susanne
    [J]. CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2010, 30 (02) : 217 - 237
  • [2] Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Anxiety Disorders: Different Treatments, Similar Mechanisms?
    Arch, Joanna J.
    Craske, Michelle G.
    [J]. CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY-SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2008, 15 (04) : 263 - 279
  • [3] Toward a unified treatment for emotional disorders
    Barlow, DH
    Allen, LB
    Choate, ML
    [J]. BEHAVIOR THERAPY, 2004, 35 (02) : 205 - 230
  • [4] An Experimental Comparison of Techniques: Cognitive Defusion, Cognitive Restructuring, and in-vivo Exposure for Social Anxiety
    Barrera, Terri L.
    Szafranski, Derek D.
    Ratcliff, Chelsea G.
    Garnaat, Sarah L.
    Norton, Peter J.
    [J]. BEHAVIOURAL AND COGNITIVE PSYCHOTHERAPY, 2016, 44 (02) : 249 - 254
  • [5] A comparison of emotion regulation strategies in response to craving cognitions: Effects on smoking behaviour, craving and affect in dependent smokers
    Beadman, Matthew
    Das, Ravi K.
    Freeman, Tom P.
    Scragg, Peter
    West, Robert
    Kamboj, Sunjeev K.
    [J]. BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 2015, 69 : 29 - 39
  • [6] Ruminative Thought Style and Depressed Mood
    Brinker, Jay K.
    Dozois, David J. A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 65 (01) : 1 - 19
  • [7] Center for Collegiate Mental Health, 2012, CCAPS 2012 TECHN MAN
  • [8] Cognitive Defusion Versus Cognitive Restructuring in the Treatment of Negative Self-Referential Thoughts: An Investigation of Process and Outcome
    Deacon, Brett
    Fawzy, Tamer
    Lickel, James
    Wolitzky-Taylor, Kate
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE PSYCHOTHERAPY, 2011, 25 (03) : 218 - 232
  • [9] Unified Protocol for the Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders: Protocol Development and Initial Outcome Data
    Ellard, Kristen K.
    Fairholme, Christopher P.
    Boisseau, Christina L.
    Farchione, Todd J.
    Barlow, David H.
    [J]. COGNITIVE AND BEHAVIORAL PRACTICE, 2010, 17 (01) : 88 - 101
  • [10] The Drexel defusion scale: A new measure of experiential distancing
    Forman, Evan M.
    Herbert, James D.
    Juarascio, Adrienne S.
    Yeomans, Peter D.
    Zebell, John A.
    Goetter, Elizabeth M.
    Moitra, Ethan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONTEXTUAL BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE, 2012, 1 (1-2) : 55 - 65