Harder soft governance in European climate and energy policy: exploring a new trend in public policy

被引:19
作者
Knodt, Michele [1 ]
Schoenefeld, Jonas J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Darmstadt, Inst Polit Sci, Darmstadt, Germany
[2] Univ East Anglia, Sch Environm Sci, Tyndall Ctr Climate Change Res, Norwich, Norfolk, England
关键词
harder soft governance; soft governance; policy monitoring; European Semester; OECD; climate governance; Energy Union; COORDINATION; EU; SURVEILLANCE; CHALLENGES; SEMESTER; LESSONS; TOOLS; POWER;
D O I
10.1080/1523908X.2020.1832885
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
While various forms of soft governance have been long in the making, there is a growing introduction of new policy elements in order to 'harden' soft governance arrangements. These new forms of 'harder' soft governance (HSG) vary in the degree of hardness in different settings. This special issue aims to derive lessons for climate and energy policy on HSG by looking across other policy fields and institutions where such 'hardening' has emerged, including in climate policy monitoring, the EU Energy Union, the UNFCCC, the OECD, the Open Method of Coordination, the European Semester, and policy surveillance in transnational city networks. Bringing the contributions together, this introduction reviews soft governance approaches, including their hardening. It then develops a framework for diagnosing HSG, including indicators such as obligations, justification, precision, 'blaming and shaming' opportunities, the role of third party actors, bundling, enforcement by policy field coupling, and sanctions. The introduction then identifies driving factors of HSG, including the role of the EU Member States, a strong need for coordination, policy entrepreneurs and institutional opportunities. The lessons from this special issue provide a useful yardstick for the future development of climate and energy governance, and the use of HSG in other policy fields.
引用
收藏
页码:857 / 869
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   The Links Among Contested Knowledge, Beliefs, and Learning in European Climate Governance: From Consensus to Conflict in Reforming Biofuels Policy [J].
Rietig, Katharina .
POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, 2018, 46 (01) :137-159
[22]   Towards a European Green Deal: The evolution of EU climate and energy policy mixes [J].
Skjaerseth, Jon Birger .
INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL AGREEMENTS-POLITICS LAW AND ECONOMICS, 2021, 21 (01) :25-41
[23]   Towards a European Green Deal: The evolution of EU climate and energy policy mixes [J].
Jon Birger Skjærseth .
International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 2021, 21 :25-41
[24]   Conflicting energy policy priorities in EU energy governance [J].
Fernandez, Rosa Maria .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES AND SCIENCES, 2018, 8 (03) :239-248
[26]   Engines of learning? Policy instruments, cities and climate governance [J].
Domorenok, Ekaterina ;
Zito, Anthony R. .
POLICY SCIENCES, 2021, 54 (03) :507-528
[27]   Policy Stability in Climate Governance: The case of the United Kingdom [J].
Rietig, Katharina ;
Laing, Timothy .
ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY AND GOVERNANCE, 2017, 27 (06) :575-587
[28]   Policy entrepreneurship in climate governance: Toward a comparative approach [J].
Green, Jessica F. .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING C-POLITICS AND SPACE, 2017, 35 (08) :1471-1482
[29]   European Union governance in the shadow of contradicting ideas: the decoupling of policy ideas and policy instruments [J].
Heidbreder, Eva G. .
EUROPEAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2013, 5 (01) :133-150
[30]   The European Union: the polycentric climate policy leader? [J].
Rayner, Tim ;
Jordan, Andrew .
WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-CLIMATE CHANGE, 2013, 4 (02) :75-90