Effects of tibolone and continuous combined hormone replacement therapy on mammographic breast density

被引:143
作者
Lundström, E
Christow, A
Kersemaekers, W
Svane, G
Azavedo, E
Söderqvist, G
Mol-Arts, M
Barkfeldt, J
von Schoultz, B
机构
[1] Karolinska Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, SE-17176 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Karolinska Hosp, Dept Radiol, S-10401 Stockholm, Sweden
[3] NV Organon, Clin Dev Dept, Vasteras, Sweden
[4] Vasteras Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Oss, Netherlands
关键词
hormone replacement therapy; tibolone; mammographic changes; breast density;
D O I
10.1067/mob.2002.121896
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to compare the effects of tibolone, continuous combined hormone replacement therapy, and placebo on mammographic breast density. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled study was performed. A total of 166 postmenopausal women were equally randomized to receive tibolone 2.5 mg, estradiol 2 mg/norethisterone acetate 1 mg (E-2/NETA), or placebo. Mammograms were performed at baseline and after 6 months of treatment. Mammographic density was quantified according to the Wolfe classification and by the percentage area of the breast that had a dense pattern. RESULTS: An increase in mammographic density was much more common among women receiving continuous combined hormone replacement therapy (46%-50%) than among those receiving tibolone (2%-6%) and placebo (0%) treatment. The difference between E-2/NETA and placebo was highly significant (P < .001). Treatment with tibolone did not differ from that with placebo. The relative risk of an increase in breast density for E-2/NETA versus tibolone was found to be 8.3 (95% Cl 2.7-25.0). CONCLUSION: An increase in mammographic density should be regarded as an unwanted side effect of hormone replacement therapy. In contrast to estrogen/progestogen treatment, tibolone seems to exert little stimulation of breast tissue.
引用
收藏
页码:717 / 722
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
[11]  
Lundstrom E, 2001, Climacteric, V4, P42
[12]   Mammographic breast density during hormone replacement therapy:: Differences according to treatment [J].
Lundström, E ;
Wilczek, B ;
von Palffy, Z ;
Söderqvist, G ;
von Schoultz, B .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1999, 181 (02) :348-352
[13]  
Magnusson C, 1999, INT J CANCER, V81, P339, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19990505)81:3<339::AID-IJC5>3.3.CO
[14]  
2-Y
[15]   PAIN AND INCREASED MAMMOGRAPHIC DENSITY IN WOMEN RECEIVING HORMONE REPLACEMENT THERAPY - A PROSPECTIVE-STUDY [J].
MCNICHOLAS, MMJ ;
HENEGHAN, JP ;
MILNER, MH ;
TUNNEY, T ;
HOURIHANE, JB ;
MACERLAINE, DP .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1994, 163 (02) :311-315
[16]  
Moore RA, 1999, BRIT J OBSTET GYNAEC, V106, P1
[17]   Estrone sulfatase versus estrone sulfotransferase in human breast cancer: potential clinical applications [J].
Pasqualini, JR ;
Chetrite, GS .
JOURNAL OF STEROID BIOCHEMISTRY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1999, 69 (1-6) :287-292
[18]   Effect of hormone replacement therapy on breast cancer risk: Estrogen versus estrogen plus progestin [J].
Ross, RK ;
Paganini-Hill, A ;
Wan, PC ;
Pike, MC .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2000, 92 (04) :328-332
[19]   Changes in breast density associated with initiation, discontinuation, and continuing use of hormone replacement therapy [J].
Rutter, CM ;
Mandelson, MT ;
Laya, MB ;
Seger, DJ ;
Taplin, S .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2001, 285 (02) :171-176
[20]   The effects of tibolone [J].
Rymer, JM .
GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 1998, 12 (03) :213-220