Tumor-to-Nipple Distance in Selecting Patients for Nipple-sparing Mastectomy

被引:9
作者
Kracoff-Sella, Sharon L. [1 ]
Allweis, Tanir M. [2 ,3 ]
Bokov, Inna [4 ]
Kadar-Sfarad, Hadas [2 ]
Shifer, Yehonatan [4 ]
Golzman, Evgenia [4 ]
Egozi, Dana [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Kaplan Med Ctr, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Rehovot, Israel
[2] Kaplan Med Ctr, Dept Gen Surg, Rehovot, Israel
[3] Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, Fac Med, Jerusalem, Israel
[4] Kaplan Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Rehovot, Israel
关键词
IMMEDIATE BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; AREOLA COMPLEX INVOLVEMENT; CANCER PATIENTS; OUTCOMES; SKIN; RISK; PREDICTORS; RECURRENCE;
D O I
10.1097/GOX.0000000000002963
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) is a valid option for carefully selected cases. Oncologic guidelines have not been established, but proximity of the tumor to the nipple, tumor size, lymph node involvement, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy have been suggested as contraindications to nipple preservation. This study describes our experience with NSM in relation to these factors, in particular distance of tumor from the nipple, to help establish evidence-based guidelines for NSM. Method: All NSM procedures performed at our institution between 2014 and 2018 were reviewed. The tumor-to-nipple distance was measured for each patient using mammography, ultrasound, or magnetic resonance imaging. All patients underwent a frozen section (FS) biopsy of the base of the nipple during surgery, and if cancer was detected, the procedure was converted to a skin-sparing mastectomy. Patients were followed for postoperative complications and cancer recurrence. Results: Sixty-eight patients (98 breasts) underwent NSM with immediate reconstruction. Fifty-three patients (78%) underwent the procedure for breast cancer. Nipple involvement was detected on FS in 1 patient and on permanent pathology after a negative FS in 1 patient. Forty-three percent of our patients had a tumor-to-nipple distance of <= 2 cm. During a mean follow-up of 32.5 months (+/- 19.4 months), no locoregional recurrences were observed; however, distant metastasis occurred in 3 patients. Conclusions: When histologic examination from the base of the nipple is negative (either by FS or permanent pathology), NSM can be considered oncologically safe. Lack of nipple involvement by preoperative clinical and imaging assessment and intraoperative FS is sufficient to classify patients as suitable for NSM.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Oncologic Outcomes of Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy with Immediate Breast Reconstruction in Patients with Tumor-Nipple Distance Less than 2.0 cm
    Alsharif, Emad
    Ryu, Jai Min
    Choi, Hee Jun
    Nam, Seok Jin
    Kim, Seok Won
    Yu, Jonghan
    Chae, Byung Joo
    Lee, Se Kyung
    Lee, Jeong Eon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BREAST CANCER, 2019, 22 (04) : 613 - 623
  • [2] Preoperative Predictors of Nipple-Areola Complex Involvement for Patients Undergoing Mastectomy for Breast Cancer
    Billar, Julie A. Y.
    Dueck, Amylou C.
    Gray, Richard J.
    Wasif, Nabil
    Pockaj, Barbara A.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 18 (11) : 3123 - 3128
  • [3] Oncologic Safety of Nipple Skin-Sparing or Total Skin-Sparing Mastectomies With Immediate Reconstruction
    Boneti, Cristiano
    Yuen, James
    Santiago, Carlos
    Diaz, Zuleika
    Robertson, Yara
    Korourian, Soheila
    Westbrook, Kent C.
    Henry-Tillman, Ronda S.
    Klimberg, V. Suzanne
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2011, 212 (04) : 686 - 693
  • [4] Nipple Skin-Sparing Mastectomy is Feasible for Advanced Disease
    Burdge, Eric C.
    Yuen, James
    Hardee, Matthew
    Gadgil, Pranjali V.
    Das, Chandan
    Henry-Tillman, Ronda
    Ochoa, Daniela
    Korourian, Soheila
    Klimberg, V. Suzanne
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 20 (10) : 3294 - 3302
  • [5] Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Clinicopathological Factors for the Detection of Occult Nipple Involvement in Breast Cancer Patients
    Byon, Wooseok
    Kim, Eunyoung
    Kwon, Junseong
    Park, Yong Lai
    Park, Chanheun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BREAST CANCER, 2014, 17 (04) : 386 - 392
  • [6] Increasing Eligibility for Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy
    Coopey, Suzanne B.
    Tang, Rong
    Lei, Lan
    Freer, Phoebe E.
    Kansal, Kari
    Colwell, Amy S.
    Gadd, Michele A.
    Specht, Michelle C.
    Austen, William G., Jr.
    Smith, Barbara L.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 20 (10) : 3218 - 3222
  • [7] Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy for Breast Cancer and Risk-Reducing Surgery: The Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center Experience
    de Alcantara Filho, Paulo
    Capko, Deborah
    Barry, John Mitchel
    Morrow, Monica
    Pusic, Andrea
    Sacchini, Virgilio S.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 18 (11) : 3117 - 3122
  • [8] Tumor-to-Nipple Distance as a Predictor of Nipple Involvement: Expanding the Inclusion Criteria for Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy
    Dent, Briar L.
    Miller, Jake A.
    Eden, Daniel J.
    Swistel, Alexander
    Talmor, Mia
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2017, 140 (01) : 1E - 8E
  • [9] Prediction of occult nipple-areola complex involvement in breast cancer patients
    Gulben, K.
    Yildirim, E.
    Berberoglu, U.
    [J]. NEOPLASMA, 2009, 56 (01) : 72 - 75
  • [10] Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy in 99 Patients With a Mean Follow-up of 5 Years
    Jensen, J. Arthur
    Orringer, Jay S.
    Giuliano, Armando E.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 18 (06) : 1665 - 1670