Reliability, failure probability, and strength of resin-based materials for CAD/CAM restorations

被引:15
作者
Lim, Kiatlin [1 ]
Yap, Adrian U-Jin [1 ,2 ]
Agarwalla, Shruti Vidhawan [1 ]
Tan, Keson Beng-Choon [1 ]
Rosa, Vinicius [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Fac Dent, 11 Lower Kent Ridge Rd, Singapore 119083, Singapore
[2] JurongHlth Serv, Dept Dent, Singapore, Singapore
关键词
Tensile strength; Reliability and validity; Composite resins; Dental restoration failure; Dental porcelain; MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; COMPOSITE; BLOCKS; TEETH;
D O I
10.1590/1678-775720150561
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective: This study investigated the Weibull parameters and 5% fracture probability of direct, indirect composites, and CAD/CAM composites. Material and Methods: Disc shaped (12 mm diameter x 1 mm thick) specimens were prepared for a direct composite [Z100 (ZO), 3M-ESPE], an indirect laboratory composite [Cerannage (CM), Shofu], and two CAD/CAM composites [Lava Ultimate (LU), 3M ESPE; Vita Enamic (VE), Vita Zahnfabrik] restorations (n=30 for each group). The specimens were polished, stored in distilled water for 24 hours at 37 degrees C. Weibull parameters (m= modulus of Weibull, sigma 0= characteristic strength) and flexural strength for 5% fracture probability (sigma 5%) were determined using a piston-on-three-balls device at 1 MPa/s in distilled water. Statistical analysis for biaxial flexural strength analysis were performed either by both one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc (alpha=0.05) or by Pearson's correlation test. Results: Ranking of m was: VE (19.5), LU (14.5), CM (11.7), and ZO (9.6). Ranking of sigma 0 (MPa) was: LU (218.1), ZO (210.4), CM (209.0), and VE (126.5). sigma 5% (MPa) was 177.9 for LU, 163.2 for CM, 154.7 for Z0, and 108.7 for VE. There was no significant difference in the m for ZO, CM, and LU. VE presented the highest m value and significantly higher than ZO. For GO and sigma 5%, ZO, CM, and LU were similar but higher than VE. Conclusion: The strength characteristics of CAD/ CAM composites vary according to their composition and microstructure. VE presented the lowest strength and highest Weibull modulus among the materials.
引用
收藏
页码:447 / 452
页数:6
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
*ASTM, 2000, C1239 ASTM
[2]   Mechanical properties of resin-ceramic CAD/CAM restorative materials [J].
Awada, Abdallah ;
Nathanson, Dan .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2015, 114 (04) :587-593
[3]   The effect of post-cure heating on residual, unreacted monomer in a commercial resin composite [J].
Bagis, YH ;
Rueggeberg, FA .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 2000, 16 (04) :244-247
[4]  
Davidowitz Gary, 2011, Dent Clin North Am, V55, P559, DOI 10.1016/j.cden.2011.02.011
[5]   Characterization of a polymer-infiltrated ceramic-network material [J].
Della Bona, Alvaro ;
Corazza, Pedro H. ;
Zhang, Yu .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 2014, 30 (05) :564-569
[6]   YIELDING OF STEEL SHEETS CONTAINING SLITS [J].
DUGDALE, DS .
JOURNAL OF THE MECHANICS AND PHYSICS OF SOLIDS, 1960, 8 (02) :100-104
[7]   Influence of surface treatments on the bond strength of repaired resin composite restorative materials [J].
Junior, Sinval A. Rodrigues ;
Ferracane, Jack L. ;
Della Bona, Alvaro .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 2009, 25 (04) :442-451
[8]   PERSPECTIVES ON STRENGTH [J].
KELLY, JR .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 1995, 11 (02) :103-110
[9]   Influence of toughness on Weibull modulus of ceramic bending strength [J].
Kendall, K. ;
Alford, N. McN. ;
Tan, S. R. ;
Birchall, J. D. .
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS RESEARCH, 1986, 1 (01) :120-123
[10]   Mechanical properties of composite resin blocks for CAD/CAM [J].
Lauvanutanon, Sasipin ;
Takahashi, Hidekazu ;
Shiozawa, Maho ;
Iwasaki, Naohiko ;
Asakawal, Yuya ;
Oki, Meiko ;
Finger, Werner J. ;
Arksornnukit, Mansuang .
DENTAL MATERIALS JOURNAL, 2014, 33 (05) :705-710