A constructivist connectionist model of transitions on false-belief tasks

被引:11
|
作者
Berthiaume, Vincent G. [1 ]
Shultz, Thomas R. [1 ,2 ]
Onishi, Kristine H. [1 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Dept Psychol, Montreal, PQ H3A 1B1, Canada
[2] McGill Univ, Sch Comp Sci, Montreal, PQ H3A 2A7, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Theory of mind; False-belief tasks; Computational models; Connectionism; Sibling-descendant cascade-correlation; 14-MONTH-OLDS KNOW; 18-MONTH-OLDS KNOW; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; AUTISTIC-CHILD; MIND; INFANTS; OTHERS; DESIRE; ATTRIBUTION; INHIBITION;
D O I
10.1016/j.cognition.2012.11.005
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
How do children come to understand that others have mental representations, e.g., of an object's location? Preschoolers go through two transitions on verbal false-belief tasks, in which they have to predict where an agent will search for an object that was moved in her absence. First, while three-and-a-half-year-olds usually fail at approach tasks, in which the agent wants to find the object, children just under four succeed. Second, only after four do children succeed at tasks in which the agent wants to avoid the object. We present a constructivist connectionist model that autonomously reproduces the two transitions and suggests that the transitions are due to increases in general processing abilities enabling children to (1) overcome a default true-belief attribution by distinguishing false-from true-belief situations, and to (2) predict search in avoidance situations, where there is often more than one correct, empty search location. Constructivist connectionist models are rigorous, flexible and powerful tools that can be analyzed before and after transitions to uncover novel and emergent mechanisms of cognitive development. (c) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:441 / 458
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Hindsight Bias and False-Belief Reasoning From Preschool to Old Age
    Bernstein, Daniel M.
    DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 57 (08) : 1387 - 1402
  • [42] A Systematic Replication of Teaching Children With Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities Correct Responding to False-Belief Tasks
    Azizull K. Dhadwal
    Adel C. Najdowski
    Jonathan Tarbox
    Behavior Analysis in Practice, 2021, 14 : 378 - 386
  • [43] Common and distinct neural networks for false-belief reasoning and inhibitory control
    Rothmayr, Christoph
    Sodian, Beate
    Hajak, Goeran
    Doehnel, Katrin
    Meinhardt, Joerg
    Sommer, Monika
    NEUROIMAGE, 2011, 56 (03) : 1705 - 1713
  • [44] Amygdala lesions do not compromise the cortical network for false-belief reasoning
    Spunt, Robert P.
    Elison, Jed T.
    Dufour, Nicholas
    Hurlemann, Rene
    Saxe, Rebecca
    Adolphs, Ralph
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2015, 112 (15) : 4827 - 4832
  • [45] Examination of the relationship between false-belief understanding and referential communication skills
    Katerina Maridaki-Kassotaki
    Katerina Antonopoulou
    European Journal of Psychology of Education, 2011, 26 : 75 - 84
  • [46] The missing explanation of the false-belief advantage in bilingual children: a longitudinal study
    Diaz, Vanessa
    Farrar, M. Jeffrey
    DEVELOPMENTAL SCIENCE, 2018, 21 (04)
  • [47] Sex differences in the neural basis of false-belief and pragmatic language comprehension
    Frank, Chiyoko Kobayashi
    Baron-Cohen, Simon
    Ganzel, Barbara L.
    NEUROIMAGE, 2015, 105 : 300 - 311
  • [48] False-belief understanding in 2.5-year-olds: evidence from two novel verbal spontaneous-response tasks
    Scott, Rose M.
    He, Zijing
    Baillargeon, Renee
    Cummins, Denise
    DEVELOPMENTAL SCIENCE, 2012, 15 (02) : 181 - 193
  • [49] 2.5-year-olds succeed at a verbal anticipatory-looking false-belief task
    He, Zijing
    Bolz, Matthias
    Baillargeon, Renee
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 30 (01) : 14 - 29