The immune privilege of corneal allografts

被引:115
作者
Niederkorn, JY
机构
[1] Univ Texas, SW Med Ctr, Dept Ophthalmol, Dallas, TX 75235 USA
[2] Univ Texas, SW Med Ctr, Dept Microbiol, Dallas, TX 75235 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00007890-199906270-00001
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background Corneal transplantation is the oldest, most common, and arguably, the most successful form of tissue transplantation. In the United States alone, over 40,000 corneal transplantations are performed each year, Less than 10% of the uncomplicated, first-time corneal grafts will undergo immune rejection even though HLA matching is not routinely performed and the use of immunosuppressive drugs is limited to the topical application of corticosteroids. The success of corneal transplantations predates the use of corticosteroids and further emphasizes the remarkable privilege of corneal allografts. Methods. Several laboratories have used rat and mouse models of orthotopic corneal transplantation (keratoplasty) in an attempt to understand the basis for the immune privilege of corneal allografts. Results. The time-honored explanation for the immune privilege of corneal allografts was based on the conspicuous avascularity of the cornea, which was believed to sequester the graft from the immune apparatus. However, results from several laboratories indicate that at least three additional features of the corneal graft contribute to its immune privileged status: (a) absence of donor-derived, antigen-presenting passenger Langerhans cells in the corneal graft; (b) expression of Fas ligand on the epithelium and endothelium of the corneal allograft; and (c) capacity of the corneal allograft to induce immune deviation of the systemic immune response. Conclusions. The immune privilege of corneal allografts is a product of at least three unique qualities of the corneal allograft that conspire to interfere with the induction and expression of allodestructive immune responses.
引用
收藏
页码:1503 / 1508
页数:6
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   Gene transfer of Fas ligand induces tumor regression in vivo [J].
Arai, H ;
Gordon, D ;
Nabel, EG ;
Nabel, GJ .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1997, 94 (25) :13862-13867
[2]  
ASHERSON GL, 1965, IMMUNOLOGY, V9, P205
[3]   T-CELL SUBSETS, BM MUTANTS, AND THE MECHANISMS OF ALLOGENEIC SKIN-GRAFT REJECTION [J].
AUCHINCLOSS, H ;
MAYER, T ;
GHOBRIAL, R ;
WINN, HJ .
IMMUNOLOGIC RESEARCH, 1989, 8 (02) :149-164
[4]   SEX CHROMATIN AS A BIOLOGIC CELL MARKER - IN THE STUDY OF THE FATE OF CORNEAL TRANSPLANTS [J].
BASU, PK ;
MILLER, I ;
ORMSBY, HL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1960, 49 (03) :513-515
[5]   HLA-DR AND HLA-DQ DISTRIBUTION IN NORMAL HUMAN OCULAR STRUCTURES [J].
BAUDOUIN, C ;
FREDJREYGROBELLET, D ;
GASTAUD, P ;
LAPALUS, P .
CURRENT EYE RESEARCH, 1988, 7 (09) :903-911
[6]  
BORA NS, 1993, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V34, P3579
[7]   CHARACTERISTICS OF REJECTION OF ORTHOTOPIC CORNEAL ALLOGRAFTS IN THE RAT [J].
CALLANAN, D ;
PEELER, J ;
NIEDERKORN, JY .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1988, 45 (02) :437-443
[8]  
Collin H B, 1966, Invest Ophthalmol, V5, P337
[9]  
COLLIN H. BARRY, 1966, INVEST OPHTHALMOL, V5, P1
[10]   ULTRASTRUCTURE OF LYMPHATIC VESSELS IN VASCULARIZED RABBIT CORNEA [J].
COLLIN, HB .
EXPERIMENTAL EYE RESEARCH, 1970, 10 (02) :207-&