Effects of dofetilide and EGIS-7229, an antiarrhythmic agent possessing class III, IV, and IB activities, on myocardial refractoriness in hyperkalemia, hypokalemia, and during β-adrenergic activation in the rabbit papillary muscle in vitro

被引:3
|
作者
Kovács, A [1 ]
Szénási, G [1 ]
机构
[1] Egis Pharmaceut Ltd, Pharmacol Lab 1, H-1475 Budapest 10, Hungary
关键词
dofetilide; antiarrhythmic agent; hypokalemia; hyperkalemia; effective refractory period;
D O I
10.1254/jphs.FP0051009
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Lengthening of the effective refractory period (ERP) by EGIS-7229, a class III/Ib/IV drug, and by dofetilide, a selective I-Kr blocker, was compared in normokalemia (NK), hypokalemia (LK), and hyperkalemia (HK) in right ventricular papillary Muscles of rabbits paced at 0.5, 1, and 2 Hz, in vitro, and also during beta-adrenergic activation. In NK, EGIS-7229 (3 and 10 mu M) and dofetilide (30 and 100 nM) similarly lengthened ERP in a steeply reverse frequency-dependent manner. The two compounds produced smaller ER-P prolongations at 0.5 Hz in HK and LK, so rate-dependence of ERP changes decreased. EGIS-7229 lengthened ERP more at 2 Hz than at 0.5 Hz at 10 mu M in LK, that is, the effect of EGIS-7229 turned into positive frequency-dependence from 3 to 10 mu M. Furthermore, EGIS-7229 lengthened ERP at 10 mu M more than dofetilide at 100 nM at 2 Hz Stimulation rate (P < 0.05). Isoproterenol (30 nM) eliminated the effect of dofetilide on ERP, while EGIS-7229 prolonged ERP during beta-adrenergic activation. In conclusion, efficacy of EGIS-7229 was superior to that of dofetilide in LK and during beta-adrenergic Stimulation, suggesting improved antiarrhythmic action for EGIS-7229 under certain conditions in the patient.
引用
收藏
页码:303 / 309
页数:7
相关论文
共 1 条
  • [1] Effects of EGIS-7229 (S 21407), a novel class III antiarrhythmic drug, on myocardial refractoriness to electrical stimulation in vivo and in vitro
    Kovács, A
    Gyönös, I
    Magyar, J
    Bányász, T
    Nánási, PP
    Spedding, M
    Szénási, G
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR PHARMACOLOGY, 2001, 37 (01) : 78 - 88