Construction and Optimization of the Ecological Security Pattern in Liyang, China

被引:11
作者
Fan, Xiangnan [1 ]
Cheng, Yuning [1 ]
Tan, Fangqi [1 ]
Zhao, Tianyi [1 ]
机构
[1] Southeast Univ, Sch Architecture, Nanjing 210096, Peoples R China
关键词
ecological-security pattern; optimization evaluation; optimal granularity; circuit theory; minimum cumulative-resistance model; LANDSCAPE CONNECTIVITY; HABITAT QUALITY; AREAS; CONSERVATION; RESTORATION; PROTECTION; IDENTIFICATION; RESISTANCE; FORESTS; INDEXES;
D O I
10.3390/land11101641
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Rapid urbanization with unreasonable human disturbances has caused a serious ecological crisis. By constructing an ecological-security pattern (ESP), key landscape elements can be effectively identified. ESP optimization helps to improve a city's ecosystem services and achieve the harmonious development between man and nature. Therefore, it is crucial to construct an accurate ESP and propose practical ESP optimization strategies. Taking Liyang City as an example, this paper first constructed the ESP with a combination methodology of circuit theory, graph theory, the granularity-reverse method, and the comprehensive-evaluation method. Then, strategies for ESP optimization were proposed in terms of ecological restoration and ecological source promotion. Finally, the optimized ESP was verified by quantitative assessment involving landscape connectivity and network structure. Research results show that the current ESP includes 24 ecological sources, 41 ecological corridors, and 50 ecological nodes that need ecological restoration. In the optimized ESP, 31.5 km(2) of ecological land is added, 3 ecological sources are added, 55 ecological corridors are generated, and the number of nodes in the ecological network is increased by 4. By comparing the evaluation results before and after optimization, it can be seen that the optimization scheme has a positive effect on landscape connectivity and ecological coordination of the whole region.
引用
收藏
页数:28
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]   Urban sustainability assessment framework development: The ranking and weighting of sustainability indicators using analytic hierarchy process [J].
Ameen, Raed Fawzi Mohammed ;
Mourshed, Monjur .
SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2019, 44 :356-366
[2]  
Andersen M.K., 1997, EUROPEAN ENV POLICY, V1st ed., P40
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2007, PREAMBL CONV BIOL DI
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1986, Landscape Ecology
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Connectivity analysis software for estimating linkage priority, DOI DOI 10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.5673715
[6]   Prioritization of habitat patches for landscape connectivity conservation differs between least-cost and resistance distances [J].
Avon, Catherine ;
Berges, Laurent .
LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2016, 31 (07) :1551-1565
[7]   Habitat corridors for humans and nature in Germany [J].
Böttcher, M ;
Reck, H ;
Hänel, K ;
Winter, A .
GAIA-ECOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES FOR SCIENCE AND SOCIETY, 2005, 14 (02) :163-166
[8]  
Chen Xiao-ping, 2016, Yingyong Shengtai Xuebao, V27, P1611, DOI 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201605.016
[9]   Landscape structure indices for assessing urban ecological networks [J].
Cook, EA .
LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2002, 58 (2-4) :269-280
[10]   Construction and optimization of green space ecological networks in urban fringe areas: A case study with the urban fringe area of Tongzhou district in Beijing [J].
Cui, Liu ;
Wang, Jia ;
Sun, Lu ;
Lv, Chundong .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 276 (276)