A Comparative Study of Meta-Modeling for Response Estimation of Stochastic Nonlinear MDOF Systems Using MIMO-NARX Models

被引:3
作者
Chen, Menghui [1 ]
Gao, Xiaoshu [2 ]
Chen, Cheng [3 ]
Guo, Tong [1 ]
Xu, Weijie [1 ]
机构
[1] Southeast Univ, Key Lab Concrete & Prestressed Concrete Struct, Minist Educ, Nanjing 210096, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Jinan 250061, Peoples R China
[3] San Francisco State Univ, Sch Engn, San Francisco, CA 94132 USA
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2022年 / 12卷 / 22期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
nonlinear autoregressive with exogenous input (NARX); multi-degree-of-freedom; nonlinear structure; uncertainty analysis; meta-model; OUTPUT PARAMETRIC MODELS; NON-LINEAR SYSTEMS; POLYNOMIAL-CHAOS; DESIGN; IDENTIFICATION; EARTHQUAKE; SIMULATION;
D O I
10.3390/app122211553
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Complex dynamic behavior of nonlinear structures makes it challenging for uncertainty analysis through Monte Carlo simulations (MCS). Surrogate modeling presents an efficient and accurate computational alternative for a large number of MCS. The previous study has demonstrated that the multi-input multi-output nonlinear autoregressive with exogenous input (MIMO-NARX) model provides good discrete-time representations of deterministic nonlinear multi-degree-of-freedom (MDOF) structural dynamic systems. Model order reduction (MOR) is executed to eliminate insignificant modes to reduce the computational burden due to too many degrees of freedom. In this study, the MIMO-NARX strategy is integrated with different meta-modeling techniques for uncertainty analysis. Different meta-models including Kriging, polynomial chaos expansion (PCE), and arbitrary polynomial chaos (APC) are used to surrogate the NARX coefficients for system uncertainties. A nine-DOF structure is used as an MDOF dynamic system to evaluate different meta-models for the MIMO-NARX. Good fitness of statistical responses is observed between the MCS results of the original system and all surrogated MIMO-NARX predictions. It is demonstrated that the APC-NARX model with the advantage of being data-driven is the most efficient and accurate tool for uncertainty quantification of nonlinear structural dynamics.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   A new model order reduction strategy adapted to nonlinear problems in earthquake engineering [J].
Bamer, Franz ;
Amiri, Abbas Kazemi ;
Bucher, Christian .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2017, 46 (04) :537-559
[2]   A Kriging-NARX Model for Uncertainty Quantification of Nonlinear Stochastic Dynamical Systems in Time Domain [J].
Bhattacharyya, Biswarup ;
Jacquelin, Eric ;
Brizard, Denis .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MECHANICS, 2020, 146 (07)
[3]   IDENTIFICATION OF MIMO NON-LINEAR SYSTEMS USING A FORWARD-REGRESSION ORTHOGONAL ESTIMATOR [J].
BILLINGS, SA ;
CHEN, S ;
KORENBERG, MJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONTROL, 1989, 49 (06) :2157-2189
[4]  
Billings SA, 2013, NONLINEAR SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION: NARMAX METHODS IN THE TIME, FREQUENCY, AND SPATIO-TEMPORAL DOMAINS, P1, DOI 10.1002/9781118535561
[5]   An adaptive algorithm to build up sparse polynomial chaos expansions for stochastic finite element analysis [J].
Blatman, Geraud ;
Sudret, Bruno .
PROBABILISTIC ENGINEERING MECHANICS, 2010, 25 (02) :183-197
[6]   Polynomial Correlated Function Expansion for Nonlinear Stochastic Dynamic Analysis [J].
Chakraborty, Souvik ;
Chowdhury, Rajib .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MECHANICS, 2015, 141 (03)
[7]   Development of direct integration algorithms for structural dynamics using discrete control theory [J].
Chen, Cheng ;
Ricles, James M. .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MECHANICS, 2008, 134 (08) :676-683
[8]   Data-driven Arbitrary Polynomial Chaos Expansion on Uncertainty Quantification for Real-time Hybrid Simulation Under Stochastic Ground Motions [J].
Chen, M. ;
Guo, T. ;
Chen, C. ;
Xu, W. .
EXPERIMENTAL TECHNIQUES, 2020, 44 (06) :751-762
[9]   AK-MCS: An active learning reliability method combining Kriging and Monte Carlo Simulation [J].
Echard, B. ;
Gayton, N. ;
Lemaire, M. .
STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2011, 33 (02) :145-154
[10]   Least angle regression - Rejoinder [J].
Efron, B ;
Hastie, T ;
Johnstone, I ;
Tibshirani, R .
ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 2004, 32 (02) :494-499