Effect of polyglycolic acid mesh for prevention of pancreatic fistula after pancreatectomy A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:13
作者
Zhang, Wei [1 ]
Wei, Zhicheng [2 ,3 ]
Che, Xu [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Natl Canc Ctr, Dept Pancreat & Gastr Surg, Natl Clin Res CtrCanc,Canc Hosp, 17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Beijing 100021, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Natl Canc Ctr, Dept Hepatobiliary Surg, Natl Clin Res CtrCanc,Canc Hosp, Shenzhen 518116, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Shenzhen Hosp, Shenzhen 518116, Peoples R China
关键词
pancreatectomy; pancreatic fistula; polyethylene glycolic acid; surgical mesh; 462 DISTAL PANCREATECTOMIES; FIBRIN GLUE; OCCLUSION FAILURE; TRANSECTION LINE; DURAL REPAIR; REINFORCEMENT; COMPLICATIONS; RATES; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; STAPLERS;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000021456
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is the most common and intractable complication after partial pancreatectomy, with an incidence of 13% to 64%. Polyglycolic acid (PGA) mesh is a new technique that is designed to prevent POPF, and its effect has been evaluated in several randomized controlled trials and some retrospective cohort studies. In this study, we systematically and comprehensively analyzed the efficacy of PGA mesh based on reported studies. We searched Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases in English between January 2010 and October 2019. Analysis was performed by using Review Manger 5.3 software. Three RCTs and 8 nonrandomized studies were eligible with a total of 1598 patients including 884 PGA group patients and 714 control group patients. For pancreatoduodenectomy (PD), distal pancreatectomy (DP), and the 2 partial pancreatectomy (PD or DP), we found significant statistical differences in overall POPF (relative risk [RR] = 0.75, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.61-0.91,P= .004; RR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.57-0.96,P = .02;RR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.64-0.89,P = .0009, respectively) and clinical pancreatic fistula (PF) (RR = 0.5, 95% CI = 0.37-0.68,P < .00001; RR = 0.31, 95% CI = 0.21-0.46,P < .00001; RR = 0.41, 95% CI = 0.32-0.52,P < .00001, respectively) in favor of PGA. For partial pancreatectomy, significant statistical differences were found in overall complications (RR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.67-0.88,P = .0002) and estimated blood loss (weighted mean difference [WMD] = -53.58; 95% CI: -101.20 to -5.97,P = .03) in favor of PGA. We did not find significant differences regarding operative time (WMD = -8.86; 95% CI: -27.59 to 9.87,P = .35) and hospital stay (WMD = -2.73; 95% CI: -7.53 to 2.06,P = .26). This meta-analysis shows the benefits of the PGA mesh technique regarding POPF, clinical PF, and postoperative complications. This still needs to be verified by more randomized control trials.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] Allen PJ, 2014, NEW ENGL J MED, V371, P875, DOI [10.1056/NEJMc1407470, 10.1056/NEJMoa1313688]
  • [2] The unsolved problem of fistula after left pancreatectomy: The benefit of cautious drain management
    Balzano, G
    Zerbi, A
    Cristallo, M
    Di Carlo, V
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2005, 9 (06) : 837 - 842
  • [3] Postoperative pancreatic fistula: An international study group (ISGPF) definition
    Bassi, C
    Dervenis, C
    Butturini, G
    Fingerhut, A
    Yeo, C
    Izbicki, J
    Neoptolemos, J
    Sarr, M
    Traverso, W
    Buchler, M
    [J]. SURGERY, 2005, 138 (01) : 8 - 13
  • [4] The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 Years After
    Bassi, Claudio
    Marchegiani, Giovanni
    Dervenis, Christos
    Sarr, Micheal
    Abu Hilal, Mohammad
    Adham, Mustapha
    Allen, Peter
    Andersson, Roland
    Asbun, Horacio J.
    Besselink, Marc G.
    Conlon, Kevin
    Del Chiaro, Marco
    Falconi, Massimo
    Fernandez-Cruz, Laureano
    Fernandez-Del Castillo, Carlos
    Fingerhut, Abe
    Friess, Helmut
    Gouma, Dirk J.
    Hackert, Thilo
    Izbicki, Jakob
    Lillemoe, Keith D.
    Neoptolemos, John P.
    Olah, Attila
    Schulick, Richard
    Shrikhande, Shailesh V.
    Takada, Tadahiro
    Takaori, Kyoichi
    Traverso, William
    Vollmer, Charles
    Wolfgang, Christopher L.
    Yeo, Charles J.
    Salvia, Roberto
    Buehler, Marcus
    [J]. SURGERY, 2017, 161 (03) : 584 - 591
  • [5] A Dual-Institution Randomized Controlled Trial of Remnant Closure after Distal Pancreatectomy: Does the Addition of a Falciform Patch and Fibrin Glue Improve Outcomes?
    Carter, Timothy I.
    Fong, Zhi Ven
    Hyslop, Terry
    Lavu, Harish
    Tan, Wei Phin
    Hardacre, Jeffrey
    Sauter, Patricia K.
    Kennedy, Eugene P.
    Yeo, Charles J.
    Rosato, Ernest L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2013, 17 (01) : 102 - 109
  • [6] Polyglycolic acid-induced inflammation: Role of hydrolysis and resulting complement activation
    Ceonzo, K
    Gaynor, A
    Shaffer, L
    Kojima, K
    Vacanti, CA
    Stahl, GL
    [J]. TISSUE ENGINEERING, 2006, 12 (02): : 301 - 308
  • [7] Pancreatic fistula rates after 462 distal pancreatectomies: Staplers do not decrease fistula rates
    Ferrone, Cristina R.
    Warshaw, Andrew L.
    Rattner, David W.
    Berger, David
    Zheng, Hui
    Rawal, Bhupendra
    Rodriguez, Ruben
    Thayer, Sarah P.
    Fernandez-del Castillo, Carlos
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2008, 12 (10) : 1691 - 1697
  • [8] Rates of complications and death after pancreaticoduodenectomy: Risk factors and the impact of hospital volume
    Gouma, DJ
    van Geenen, RCI
    van Gulik, TM
    de Haan, RJ
    de Wit, LT
    Busch, ORC
    Obertop, H
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2000, 232 (06) : 786 - 794
  • [9] Guzman EA, 2009, AM SURGEON, V75, P954
  • [10] Mesh Reinforcement of Pancreatic Transection Decreases Incidence of Pancreatic Occlusion Failure for Left Pancreatectomy A Single-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial
    Hamilton, Nicholas A.
    Porembka, Matthew R.
    Johnston, Fabian M.
    Gao, Feng
    Strasberg, Steven M.
    Linehan, David C.
    Hawkins, William G.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2012, 255 (06) : 1037 - 1042