CROWN RUST RESISTANCE IN HYBRID AVENA (AVENA STERILIS AND AVENA SATIVA)

被引:0
|
作者
Hammami, I [1 ]
Elgazzah, M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tunis El Manar, Funct Prote & Nutraceut Potential Biodivers Tunis, ISSBAT, Issbat, Tunisia
[2] Univ Tunis El Manar, Biodivers Lab, Biotechnol & Climate Change, FST, Tunis, Tunisia
来源
关键词
Avena sterilis; Avena sativa; crown rust; Awn development; kernel; PUCCINIA-CORONATA; GENETIC-ANALYSIS; OAT; ASSOCIATION; TUNISIA;
D O I
10.36899/JAPS.2020.5.0132
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Oat production is usually menaced by the presence of overwhelming pathogens worldwide. Oat crown rust disease causes significant yield losses in cultivated oat. Characterization of the genetic components underlying disease resistance is highly relevant for resistance breeding programs. Interspecific crossing was made between the resistant ecotype, spontaneous oats (Avena sterilis) and a susceptible cultivated oat (Avena sativa). Resistance to crown rust was assessed using the area under the disease progress curve (AUDPC) for each individual plant. Parents were not only contrasting by their reaction to the phytopathogen, but also by their kernel morphology. In spontaneous oat flowers, the lemma is easily dislodged and showed single long twisted geniculate awn, whereas cultivated lines were having opposite characters. Kernel phenotype analysis among F-2, F-3 and BC1S1 plants showed that each awn development pattern could be encoded by one semi-dominant factor. Recessive homozygote genotype meant awnless, While, heterozygosis genotype showed an intermediate phenotype. Diversity in awn length and awn number in F-2 and F-3 kernels could be explained by all the possible recombination's of the two factors. Analysis of resistant and susceptible ratio in F-2 and F-3 hybrids using Chisquared (chi(2)) test showed that resistance to oat crown rust of JT(0) seemed to be oligogenic and may be encoded by three dominant genes with epistatic effects. Whereas, JT(5) resistance trait could be encoded by a single dominant gene. Combination of these genes in a local oat cultivar could be an efficient way to reduce losses caused by crown rust disease.
引用
收藏
页码:1154 / 1162
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Avena barbata, a potential source of new crown rust resistance in oat
    Carson, M. L.
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 2008, 98 (06) : S31 - S31
  • [32] SEGREGATION FOR CROWN AND STEM RUST RESISTANCE IN DIPLOID AND AUTOTETRAPLOID AVENA STRIGOSA
    DYCK, PL
    ZILLINSKY, FJ
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF GENETICS AND CYTOLOGY, 1962, 4 (04): : 469 - &
  • [33] SPONTANEOUS AND INDUCED INTERSPECIFIC GENE TRANSFER FOR CROWN RUST RESISTANCE IN AVENA
    SHARMA, DC
    FORSBERG, RA
    CROP SCIENCE, 1977, 17 (06) : 855 - 860
  • [34] Field Application of Benzothiadiazole (BTH) to Oats (Avena sativa): Effects on Crown Rust Resistance and Avenanthramide Production
    Wise, Mitchell L.
    Vinje, Marcus A.
    Conley, Shawn P.
    CROP SCIENCE, 2016, 56 (04) : 1904 - 1913
  • [35] Differences in Salinity Tolerance in Avena sativa and Avena nuda
    Zhang, Junchao
    Pu, Dan
    Yang, Chenxi
    Wang, Pei
    Zhao, Yuanyuan
    Zhou, Qingping
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2025, 15 (03):
  • [36] HYBRIDIZATION AMONG BRAZILIAN OAT (AVENA-SATIVA L) CULTIVARS AND THE WILD OAT AVENA-STERILIS L
    SERENOTAVARES, MJCM
    BODANESEZANETTINI, MH
    DECARVALHO, FIF
    PESQUISA AGROPECUARIA BRASILEIRA, 1995, 30 (03) : 383 - 388
  • [37] Herbicide resistance and gene flow in wild-oats (Avena fatua and Avena sterilis ssp. ludoviciana)
    Cavan, G
    Biss, P
    Moss, SR
    ANNALS OF APPLIED BIOLOGY, 1998, 133 (02) : 207 - 217
  • [38] Association of avenanthramide concentration in oat (Avena sativa L.) grain with crown rust incidence and genetic resistance
    Wise, Mitchell L.
    Doehlert, Douglas C.
    McMullen, Michael S.
    CEREAL CHEMISTRY, 2008, 85 (05) : 639 - 641
  • [39] LINKAGE OF GENES CONFERRING SPECIFIC RESISTANCE TO OAT CROWN RUST IN DIPLOID AVENA
    GREGORY, JW
    WISE, RP
    GENOME, 1994, 37 (01) : 92 - 96
  • [40] RESISTANCE TO STEM RUST IN AVENA-FATUA
    JOHNSON, LDR
    ROTHMAN, PG
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 1986, 76 (10) : 1147 - 1147