Impact of university intellectual property policy on the performance of university-industry research collaboration

被引:57
作者
Okamuro, Hiroyuki [1 ]
Nishimura, Junichi [2 ]
机构
[1] Hitotsubashi Univ, Grad Sch Econ, Tokyo 1868601, Japan
[2] Hitotsubashi Univ, Inst Innovat Res, Tokyo 1868603, Japan
关键词
University; Intellectual property policy; Research collaboration; Commitment; Project performance; Japan; TECHNOLOGY-TRANSFER OFFICES; DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION; NEGATIVE AFFECTIVITY; INNOVATION; FIRMS; DETERMINANTS; PRODUCTIVITY; SPILLOVERS; EFFICIENCY; ALLIANCES;
D O I
10.1007/s10961-012-9253-z
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Despite the expectation of various advantages, university-industry research collaboration (UIC), a relationship between two different worlds, often faces serious conflicts. The performance of UIC depends on the research partners' strategies and institutional designs through which they seek to mitigate these conflicts and increase partner incentives. We pay special attention to the role of the university intellectual property (IP) policy, formally introduced to Japan in 2003, as the basis of UIC contracts and empirically examine its impact on the performance of UIC projects, considering the factors in firms' participation in UIC. We argue that the university IP policy that is equitable in sharing revenue and royalty from innovative outcomes and applied flexibly according to the partner's needs may contribute to improving project performance by enhancing the commitment of firms, and we test our hypotheses using a sample of Japanese firms obtained from our original survey. The estimation results support the hypotheses, although the mediation via the firm's commitment only partially explains the relationship between the university IP policy and UIC performance.
引用
收藏
页码:273 / 301
页数:29
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   Patents and innovation counts as measures of regional production of new knowledge [J].
Acs, ZJ ;
Anselin, L ;
Varga, A .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2002, 31 (07) :1069-1085
[2]   THE MANAGEMENT OF INNOVATION [J].
AGHION, P ;
TIROLE, J .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1994, 109 (04) :1185-1209
[3]   Measuring the efficiency of university technology transfer [J].
Anderson, Timothy R. ;
Daim, Tugrul U. ;
Lavoie, Francois F. .
TECHNOVATION, 2007, 27 (05) :306-318
[4]  
[Anonymous], 13 INT SCHUMP SOC C
[5]   Local geographic spillovers between university research and high technology innovations [J].
Anselin, L ;
Varga, A ;
Acs, Z .
JOURNAL OF URBAN ECONOMICS, 1997, 42 (03) :422-448
[6]   THE MODERATOR MEDIATOR VARIABLE DISTINCTION IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH - CONCEPTUAL, STRATEGIC, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
BARON, RM ;
KENNY, DA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (06) :1173-1182
[7]   SHOULD NEGATIVE AFFECTIVITY REMAIN AN UNMEASURED VARIABLE IN THE STUDY OF JOB STRESS [J].
BRIEF, AP ;
BURKE, MJ ;
ROBINSON, BS ;
GEORGE, JM ;
WEBSTER, J .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1988, 73 (02) :193-198
[8]   Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university-industry collaboration [J].
Bruneel, Johan ;
D'Este, Pablo ;
Salter, Ammon .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2010, 39 (07) :858-868
[9]   Performance of Spanish universities in technology transfer: An empirical analysis [J].
Caldera, Aida ;
Debande, Olivier .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2010, 39 (09) :1160-1173
[10]   Assessing the relative performance of UK university technology transfer offices: parametric and non-parametric evidence [J].
Chapple, W ;
Lockett, A ;
Siegel, D ;
Wright, M .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2005, 34 (03) :369-384