Investigating the Origin of TMS-evoked Brain Potentials Using Topographic Analysis

被引:4
作者
Sulcova, Dominika [1 ]
Salatino, Adriana [1 ,2 ]
Ivanoiu, Adrian [1 ,3 ]
Mouraux, Andre [1 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Louvain, Inst Neurosci IoNS, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium
[2] Univ Turin, Dept Psychol, I-10124 Turin, Italy
[3] Clin Univ St Luc, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium
关键词
transcranial magnetic stimulation; electroencephalography; TMS-evoked potentials; microstate analysis; primary motor cortex; angular gyrus; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; INDEPENDENT COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PRIMARY MOTOR CORTEX; MEDIAN NERVE; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHIC RESPONSES; EEG; OSCILLATIONS; EXCITABILITY; ACTIVATION; TUTORIAL;
D O I
10.1007/s10548-022-00917-w
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
The combination of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and electroencephalography (EEG) represents an increasingly popular tool to non-invasively probe cortical excitability in humans. TMS-evoked brain potentials (TEPs) are composed of successive components reflecting the propagation of activity from the site of stimulation, thereby providing information on the state of brain networks. However, TMS also generates peripherally evoked sensory activity which contributes to TEP waveforms and hinders their interpretation. In the present study, we examined whether topographic analysis of TEPs elicited by stimulation of two distinct cortical targets can disentangle confounding signals from the genuine TMS-evoked cortical response. In 20 healthy subjects, TEPs were evoked by stimulation of the left primary motor cortex (M1) and the left angular gyrus (AG). Topographic dissimilarity analysis and microstate analysis were used to identify target-specific TEP components. Furthermore, we explored the contribution of cortico-spinal activation by comparing TEPs elicited by stimulation below and above the threshold to evoke motor responses. We observed topographic dissimilarity between M1 and AG TEPs until approximately 80 ms post-stimulus and identified early TEP components that likely reflect specific TMS-evoked activity. Later components peaking at 100 and 180 ms were similar in both datasets and attributed to sensory-evoked activity. Analysis of sub- and supra-threshold M1 TEPs revealed a component at 17 ms that possibly reflects the cortico-spinal output of the stimulated area. Moreover, supra-threshold M1 activation influenced the topography of almost all later components. Together, our results demonstrate the utility of topographic analysis for the evaluation and interpretation of TMS-evoked EEG responses.
引用
收藏
页码:583 / 598
页数:16
相关论文
共 59 条
  • [1] Pinging the brain with transcranial magnetic stimulation reveals cortical reactivity in time and space
    Ahn, Sangtae
    Frohlich, Flavio
    [J]. BRAIN STIMULATION, 2021, 14 (02) : 304 - 315
  • [2] HUMAN CORTICAL POTENTIALS-EVOKED BY STIMULATION OF THE MEDIAN NERVE .1. CYTOARCHITECTONIC AREAS GENERATING SHORT-LATENCY ACTIVITY
    ALLISON, T
    MCCARTHY, G
    WOOD, CC
    DARCEY, TM
    SPENCER, DD
    WILLIAMSON, PD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1989, 62 (03) : 694 - 710
  • [3] BARKER AT, 1985, LANCET, V1, P1106
  • [4] Reproducibility in TMS-EEG studies: A call for data sharing, standard procedures and effective experimental control
    Belardinelli, Paolo
    Biabani, Mana
    Blumberger, Daniel M.
    Bortoletto, Marta
    Casarotto, Silvia
    David, Olivier
    Desideri, Debora
    Etkin, Amit
    Ferrarelli, Fabio
    Fitzgerald, Paul B.
    Fornito, Alex
    Gordon, Pedro C.
    Gosseries, Olivia
    Harquel, Sylvain
    Julkunen, Petro
    Keller, Corey J.
    Kimiskidis, Vasilios K.
    Lioumis, Pantelis
    Miniussi, Carlo
    Rosanova, Mario
    Rossi, Simone
    Sarasso, Simone
    Wu, Wei
    Zrenner, Christoph
    Daskalakis, Zafiris J.
    Rogasch, Nigel C.
    Massimini, Marcello
    Ziemann, Ulf
    Ilmoniemi, Risto J.
    [J]. BRAIN STIMULATION, 2019, 12 (03) : 787 - 790
  • [5] Combining non-invasive transcranial brain stimulation with neuroimaging and electrophysiology: Current approaches and future perspectives
    Bergmann, Til Ole
    Karabanov, Anke
    Hartwigsen, Gesa
    Thielscher, Axel
    Siebner, Hartwig Roman
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2016, 140 : 4 - 19
  • [6] Biabani M, 2018, BIORXIV
  • [7] Characterizing and minimizing the contribution of sensory inputs to TMS-evoked potentials
    Biabani, Mana
    Fornito, Alex
    Mutanen, Tuomas P.
    Morrow, James
    Rogasch, Nigel C.
    [J]. BRAIN STIMULATION, 2019, 12 (06) : 1537 - 1552
  • [8] Transcranial magnetic stimulation and cortical evoked potentials: A TMS/EEG co-registration study
    Bonato, C.
    Miniussi, C.
    Rossini, P. M.
    [J]. CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2006, 117 (08) : 1699 - 1707
  • [9] Prior intention can locally tune inhibitory processes in the primary motor cortex: direct evidence from combined TMS-EEG
    Bonnard, M.
    Spieser, L.
    Meziane, H. B.
    de Graaf, J. B.
    Pailhous, J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2009, 30 (05) : 913 - 923
  • [10] The contribution of TMS-EEG coregistration in the exploration of the human cortical connectome
    Bortoletto, Marta
    Veniero, Domenica
    Thut, Gregor
    Miniussi, Carlo
    [J]. NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 2015, 49 : 114 - 124