Spatial variability in the Folsom archaeological record: A multi-scalar approach

被引:24
作者
Andrews, Brian N. [1 ,2 ]
LaBelle, Jason M. [3 ]
Seebach, John D. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] So Methodist Univ, Dept Anthropol, Dallas, TX 75275 USA
[2] Rogers State Univ, Dept Hist & Polit Sci, Claremore, OK 74017 USA
[3] Colorado State Univ, Dept Anthropol, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[4] Sul Ross State Univ, Ctr Big Bend Studies, Alpine, TX 79832 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2307/25470500
中图分类号
Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
030303 ;
摘要
Most models of Folsom adaptation consider specialized bison hunting and high rates of residential mobility to be defining characteristics. We use spatial and assemblage content data from a sample of 619 Folsom sites located throughout the Great Plains, Rocky Mountains, and Southwest to evaluate whether the archaeological record actually reflects these characteristics. Three spatial scales of analysis are utilized. First, site scale analysis of a subset of sites shows a great deal of variability in spatial and temporal characteristics. Sites can be roughly divided into small, single occupation locales and large, serially occupied sites. Second, day-to-day foraging occurs at what we term the foraging scale. This intermediate spatial scale is poorly understood for Folsom groups, though large sites such as Blackwater Draw and Lindenmeier provide clues that are supplemented by information from the ethnographic record. Third, the macro-regional scale analysis utilizes the entire site sample and indicates that the Folsom archaeological record consists primarily of small locales scattered across the landscape punctuated by only a few large, serially occupied sites. Overall, our analysis suggests that Folsom adaptive systems were more variable than normally recognized, and, in certain settings, may have been characterized by reduced residential mobility. Furthermore, we postulate that Folsom land use, rather than being conditioned primarily by mobile prey, may have been at least partly conditioned by more predictable resources such as wood, water, and toolstone.
引用
收藏
页码:464 / 490
页数:27
相关论文
共 112 条
[1]   Why flute? Folsom point design and adaptation [J].
Ahler, SA ;
Geib, PR .
JOURNAL OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2000, 27 (09) :799-820
[2]  
AMICH DS, 1994, THESIS U NEW MEXICO
[3]  
ANDREWS BN, 2002, 60 PLAINS ANTHR C OK
[4]  
ANDREWS BN, 2005, 7 BIENN ROCK MOUNT A
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1991, ETHNOARCHAEOLOGICAL
[6]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1984, ARCHAEOLOGY E N AM
[8]  
[Anonymous], MILL IRON SITE
[9]  
[Anonymous], 1999, INT MONOGRAPHS PREHI
[10]  
[Anonymous], 1983, ARCHAEOL REV CAMBRID, DOI DOI 10.17863/CAM.25828