The species composition-ecosystem function relationship: A global meta-analysis using data from intact and recovering ecosystems

被引:23
作者
Carrick, Peter J. [1 ]
Forsythe, Katherine J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cape Town, Dept Biol Sci, Plant Conservat Unit, Rondebosch, South Africa
[2] Univ Cape Town, Percy FitzPatrick Inst African Ornithol, Dept Biol Sci, Rondebosch, South Africa
关键词
ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION; FOREST RESTORATION; PLANT DIVERSITY; BIOTIC CONTROL; BIODIVERSITY; VEGETATION; CONSERVATION; PRODUCTIVITY; MULTIFUNCTIONALITY; COMMUNITIES;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0236550
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The idea that biodiversity is necessary in order for ecosystems to function properly has long been used as a basic argument for the conservation of species, and has led to an abundance of research exploring the relationships between species richness and ecosystem function. Here we present a meta-analysis of global ecosystems using the Bray-Curtis index to explore more complex changes in the species composition of natural ecosystems, and their relationship with ecosystem functions. By using data recorded, firstly in reference sites and secondly in recovering sites, captured in restoration ecology studies, we pose the following questions: Firstly, how much variation is there in species composition and in ecosystem function in an intact ecosystem? Secondly, once an ecosystem has become degraded, is there a general relationship between its recovery in species composition and its recovery in ecosystem function? Thirdly, is this relationship the same for all types of ecosystem functions? Data from 21 studies yielded 478 comparisons of mean values for ecosystems. On Average, sites within the same intact natural ecosystems shared only a 48% similarity in species composition but were 69% similar in ecosystem functioning. In recovering ecosystems the relationship between species composition and ecosystem function was weak and saturating (directly accounting for only 2% of the variation). Only two of the six types of ecosystem function examined, biomass and biotic structure, showed a significant relationship with species composition, and the three types that measured soil functions showed no significant relationship. To date, most biodiversity-ecosystem function (BEF) research has been conducted in simplified ecosystems using the simple species richness metric. This study encourages a broader examination of the drivers of ecosystem functions under realistic scenarios of biodiversity change, and highlights the need to properly account for the extensive natural variation.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 98 条
[1]  
Andersen Alan N., 2003, Ecological Management & Restoration, V4, pS12, DOI 10.1046/j.1442-8903.4.s.2.x
[2]   Quantifying the evidence for biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning and services [J].
Balvanera, Patricia ;
Pfisterer, Andrea B. ;
Buchmann, Nina ;
He, Jing-Shen ;
Nakashizuka, Tohru ;
Raffaelli, David ;
Schmid, Bernhard .
ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2006, 9 (10) :1146-1156
[3]   Floristic composition, beta diversity, and nestedness of reference sites for restoration of xeroriparian areas [J].
Beauchamp, Vanessa B. ;
Shafroth, Patrick B. .
ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2011, 21 (02) :465-476
[4]  
Beisner BE, 2003, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V1, P376, DOI 10.1890/1540-9295(2003)001[0376:ASSIE]2.0.CO
[5]  
2
[6]  
Bradshaw A., 1987, Restoration ecology, a synethic approach to ecological research, P23
[7]   Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in dynamic landscapes [J].
Brose, Ulrich ;
Hillebrand, Helmut .
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2016, 371 (1694)
[8]  
Brown S, 2005, J ENVIRON QUAL, V34, P139
[9]   THE RESTORATION OF BIODIVERSITY: WHERE HAS RESEARCH BEEN AND WHERE DOES IT NEED TO GO? [J].
Brudvig, Lars A. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2011, 98 (03) :549-558
[10]   Using model systems to address the biodiversity-ecosystem functioning process [J].
Bulling, M. T. ;
White, P. C. L. ;
Raffaelli, D. G. ;
Pierce, G. J. .
MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES, 2006, 311 :295-309