Influence measures based on the volume of confidence ellipsoids for GEE

被引:5
作者
Carmen Pardo, Maria [1 ]
Alonso, Rosa [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Complutense Madrid, Dept Stat & OR 1, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
关键词
Confidence ellipsoids; Generalized estimating equations; Influence; Longitudinal data; GENERALIZED ESTIMATING EQUATIONS; LINEAR-MODELS; LONGITUDINAL DATA; DIAGNOSTICS;
D O I
10.1002/bimj.201100150
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The generalized estimating equations (GEE) derived by Liang and Zeger to analyze longitudinal data have been used in a wide range of medical and biological applications. To make regression a useful and meaningful statistical tool, emphasis should be placed not only on inference or fitting, but also on diagnosing potential data problems. Most of the usual diagnostics for linear regression models have been generalized for GEE. However, global influence measures based on the volume of confidence ellipsoids are not available for GEE analysis. This article presents an extension of these measures that is valid for correlated-measures regression analysis using GEEs. The proposed measures are illustrated by an analysis of epileptic seizure count data arising from a study of prograbide as an adjuvant therapy for partial seizures and some simulated data sets.
引用
收藏
页码:552 / 567
页数:16
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1983, Generalized Linear Models
[2]  
Atkinson A., 1985, Oxford Statistical Science Series
[3]  
Belsley D.A., 2005, REGRESSION DIAGNOSTI
[4]  
Chang YC, 2000, STAT MED, V19, P1277, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(20000530)19:10<1277::AID-SIM494>3.3.CO
[5]  
2-J
[6]  
Chatterjee S., 1986, Stat. Sci., V1, P379, DOI [10.1214/ss/1177013622, DOI 10.1214/SS/1177013622]
[7]  
Cook R. D., 1982, RESIDUALS INFLUENCE
[8]  
Cook R. D., 1986, J ROYAL STAT SOC B, V42, P1
[9]   Local influence in generalized estimating equations [J].
Jung, Kang-Mo .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF STATISTICS, 2008, 35 (02) :286-294
[10]   ON INFORMATION AND SUFFICIENCY [J].
KULLBACK, S ;
LEIBLER, RA .
ANNALS OF MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS, 1951, 22 (01) :79-86