Prescription pattern for orthoses in The Netherlands: Use and experience in the ambulatory phase of Duchenne muscular dystrophy

被引:11
作者
Bakker, JPJ
DeGroot, IJM
DeJong, BA
VanTolDeJager, MA
Lankhorst, GJ
机构
[1] UNIV AMSTERDAM,ACAD MED CTR,DEPT REHABIL,NL-1105 AZ AMSTERDAM,NETHERLANDS
[2] REHABIL CTR HOOGSTR,NL-3583 TM UTRECHT,NETHERLANDS
[3] FREE UNIV AMSTERDAM HOSP,DEPT REHABIL,NL-1081 HV AMSTERDAM,NETHERLANDS
关键词
Duchenne muscular dystrophy; orthotic devices;
D O I
10.3109/09638289709166545
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
In the Netherlands ankle-foot orthoses (AFO), standing frames (SF), knee-ankle-foot orthoses (KAFO) and orthopaedic footwear are frequently prescribed for patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Little is known, however, about the prescription pattern and the experience of patients. A questionnaire was sent to 25 rehabilitation physicians treating 53 patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. The use of orthoses and the patients' experience was measured during 1 year of follow-up. Our results show prescription of AFO 91%, of SF 61% and of KAFO 22%. Indications were limited passive dorsiflexion and Vignos classification 6.(1) Patient-related factors were reasons to discontinue or to refrain from using orthoses. The prescribed duration for KAFO varied greatly. Patients' experience scores for SF and KAFO were high. The time that the orthoses were worn differed greatly from the recommended time. Ready-made shoes were prescribed for equinovarus during ambulation. Similarly, ready-made shoes or custom-made shoes were advised for wheelchair-dependent patients. This study shows no uniform prescription pattern for AFO, SF, KAFO and orthopaedic footwear. The prescription pattern was influenced by patient-related factors and actual use greatly differed from the recommended time.
引用
收藏
页码:318 / 325
页数:8
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1965, JOINT MOT METH MEAS
[2]  
BOWKER JH, 1978, ORTHOP CLIN N AM, V9, P431
[3]   DUCHENNE MUSCULAR-DYSTROPHY - PATTERNS OF CLINICAL PROGRESSION AND EFFECTS OF SUPPORTIVE THERAPY [J].
BROOKE, MH ;
FENICHEL, GM ;
GRIGGS, RC ;
MENDELL, JR ;
MOXLEY, R ;
FLORENCE, J ;
KING, WM ;
PANDYA, S ;
ROBISON, J ;
SCHIERBECKER, J ;
SIGNORE, L ;
MILLER, JP ;
GILDER, BF ;
KAISER, KK ;
MANDEL, S ;
ARFKEN, C .
NEUROLOGY, 1989, 39 (04) :475-481
[4]  
Converse J. M., 1986, Survey questions: Handcrafting the standardized questionnaire
[5]  
DEGROOT IJM, 1992, WORSH EFF PHYS DMD O
[6]  
EMERY AEH, 1987, DUCHENNE MUSCULAR DY, P221
[7]  
FOWLER FJ, 1990, APPL SOCIAL RES METH, V1
[8]  
Fowler WM, 1988, REHABILITATION MED, P298
[9]   CHILDHOOD PROGRESSIVE MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY AND ROLE OF PHYSICAL THERAPY [J].
HARRIS, SE ;
CHERRY, DB .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1974, 54 (01) :4-12
[10]  
HECKMATT JZ, 1985, DEV MED CHILD NEUROL, V27, P149