The present fiscal difficulties of many countries amplify the call for structural reforms. To provide stylized facts on how reforms worked in the past, we quantitatively review 60 studies estimating the relationship between reforms and growth. These studies examine structural reforms carried out in 26 transition countries around the world. Our results show that an average reform caused substantial costs in the short run, but had strong positive effects on long-run growth. Reforms focused on external liberalization proved to be more beneficial than others in both the short and long run. The findings hold even after correction for publication bias and misspecifications present in some primary studies.
机构:
Charles Univ Prague, Fac Social Sci, Inst Econ Studies, Prague, Czech RepublicCharles Univ Prague, Fac Social Sci, Inst Econ Studies, Prague, Czech Republic
Cazachevici, Alina
Havranek, Tomas
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Charles Univ Prague, Fac Social Sci, Inst Econ Studies, Prague, Czech RepublicCharles Univ Prague, Fac Social Sci, Inst Econ Studies, Prague, Czech Republic
Havranek, Tomas
Horvath, Roman
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Charles Univ Prague, Fac Social Sci, Inst Econ Studies, Prague, Czech Republic
Slovak Acad Sci, Inst Econ Res, Bratislava, SlovakiaCharles Univ Prague, Fac Social Sci, Inst Econ Studies, Prague, Czech Republic