Production loss due to new subclinical mastitis in Dutch dairy cows estimated with a test-day model

被引:144
作者
Halasa, T. [1 ,2 ]
Nielen, M. [1 ]
De Roos, A. P. W. [3 ]
Van Hoorne, R. [3 ]
de Jong, G. [3 ]
Lam, T. J. G. M. [2 ,4 ]
van Werven, T. [1 ,4 ]
Hogeveen, H. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Dept Farm Anim Hlth & Reprod, NL-3584 CN Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Wageningen & Res Ctr, Business Econ Grp, NL-6706 KN Wageningen, Netherlands
[3] NRS, NL-6800 AL Arnhem, Netherlands
[4] Anim Hlth Serv Ltd, Dutch Udder Hlth Ctr, NL-7400 AA Deventer, Netherlands
关键词
production loss; new case; subclinical mastitis; test-day model; SOMATIC-CELL COUNTS; MILK-PRODUCTION LOSSES; YIELD; CATTLE;
D O I
10.3168/jds.2008-1564
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Milk, fat, and protein loss due to a new subclinical mastitis case may be economically important, and the objective of this study was to estimate this loss. The loss was estimated based on test-day (TD) cow records collected over a 1-yr period from 400 randomly selected Dutch dairy herds. After exclusion of records from cows with clinical mastitis, the data set comprised 251,647 TD records from 43,462 lactations of 39,512 cows. The analysis was carried out using a random regression test-day modeling approach that predicts the cow production at each TD based on the actual production at all previous TD. The definition of new subclinical mastitis was based on the literature and assumed a new subclinical case if somatic cell count (SCC) was > 100,000 cells/mL after a TD with SCC < 50,000 cells/mL. A second data set was created by applying an adjustment to correct low SCC for the dilution effect when determining if the previous test-day SCC was < 50,000 cells/mL. Thereafter, the loss was estimated for records with SCC > 100,000 cells/mL. The production (milk, fat, or protein) losses were modeled as the difference between the actual and predicted production (milk, fat, or protein) at the TD of new subclinical mastitis, for 4,382 cow records, and 2,545 cow records after dilution correction. Primiparous cows were predicted to lose 0.31 (0.25-0.37) and 0.28 (0.20-0.35) kg of milk/d at an SCC of 200,000 cells/mL, for unadjusted and adjusted low SCC, respectively. For the same SCC increase, multiparous cows were predicted to lose 0.58 (0.54-0.62) and 0.50 (0.44-0.56) kg of milk/d, respectively. Moreover, it was found that the greater the SCC increase above 100,000 cells/mL, the greater the production losses. The estimated production losses were more precise than previously reported estimates.
引用
收藏
页码:599 / 606
页数:8
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
De Roos A., 2006, 8 WORLD C GENETICS A
[2]   Random herd curves in a test-day model for milk, fat, and protein production of dairy cattle in the Netherlands [J].
de Roos, APW ;
Harbers, AGF ;
de Jong, G .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2004, 87 (08) :2693-2701
[3]   Estimation of milk production losses due to sub-clinical mastitis in dairy cattle in Costa Rica. [J].
deGraaf, T ;
Dwinger, RH .
PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 1996, 26 (3-4) :215-222
[4]   Quarter milk somatic cell count in infected dairy cows: a meta-analysis [J].
Djabri, B ;
Bareille, N ;
Beaudeau, F ;
Seegers, H .
VETERINARY RESEARCH, 2002, 33 (04) :335-357
[5]   On distinguishing cause and consequence: Do high somatic cell counts lead to lower milk yield or does high milk yield lead to lower somatic cell count? [J].
Green, L. E. ;
Schukken, Y. H. ;
Green, M. J. .
PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2006, 76 (1-2) :74-89
[6]   Economic effects of bovine mastitis and mastitis management:: A review [J].
Halasa, T. ;
Huijps, K. ;
Osteras, O. ;
Hogeveen, H. .
VETERINARY QUARTERLY, 2007, 29 (01) :18-31
[7]  
Hamann J, 2005, Mastitis in Dairy Production, P82
[8]  
Hillerton JE, 1999, BULLETIN OF THE INTERNATIONAL DAIRY FEDERATION NO 345/1999, P4
[9]  
Hortet P, 1998, VET RES, V29, P497
[10]   Reduction in milk yield associated with somatic cell counts up to 600 000 cells/ml in French Holstein cows without clinical mastitis [J].
Hortet, P ;
Beaudeau, F ;
Seegers, H ;
Fourichon, C .
LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 1999, 61 (01) :33-42