A clinical comparison of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for the treatment of complicated appendicitis: historical cohort study

被引:14
作者
Takami, Tomoya [1 ]
Yamaguchi, Tomoyuki [1 ]
Yoshitake, Hiroyuki [1 ]
Hatano, Kotaro [1 ]
Kataoka, Naoki [1 ]
Tomita, Masafumi [1 ]
Makimoto, Shinichiro [1 ]
机构
[1] Kishiwada Tokushukai Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, 4-27-1 Kamoricho, Kishiwada, Osaka 5960042, Japan
关键词
Complicated appendicitis; Laparoscopic appendectomy; Open appendectomy; Acute appendicitis; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIALS; OPEN SURGERY; METAANALYSIS; ABSCESS; ADULTS; OUTCOMES; CHILDREN; STUMP;
D O I
10.1007/s00068-019-01086-5
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background Appendectomy is one of the most common operations. Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) is considered first-line treatment, but the use of LA for treatment of complicated appendicitis remains controversial. Here, we performed a retrospective analysis to compare clinical outcomes between patients treated with LA and those who underwent open appendectomy (OA). Methods Data for 179 patients who underwent an operation for the treatment of complicated appendicitis at our hospital between 2011 and 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. The selection included 89 patients who underwent a conventional appendectomy and 90 patients who were treated laparoscopically. Outcome measures such as mean operative time, blood loss, time until oral intake duration of hospital stay, and postoperative complications were analyzed. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the concurrent effects of the examined factors on the rate of postoperative complications. Results The mean ages of patients in the OA and LA groups were 50.17 +/- 22.77 and 50.13 +/- 25.84 year. Mean operative times were longer in the LA group than OA (10.2.56 +/- 44.4 versus 85.4 +/- 43.11 min;p = 0.009). The duration of hospital stay was shorter for the LA group (9.61 +/- 5.57 versus 12.19 +/- 8.4;p = 0.016). There were no significant differences in return to consumption of oral intake between the LA and OA groups (2.03 +/- 1.66 versus 2.48 +/- 2.17;p = 0.123). Multivariable analysis found that the rate of postoperative complications was significantly reduced for the LA group, in comparison with the postoperative-complication rate of the OA group (16.7% versus 27%; odds ratio 0.376; 95% CI 0.153-0.923;p = 0.0327). Conclusions These results suggest that LA is a safe and efficient operative procedure that provides clinically beneficial advantages in comparison with OA. Thus, when possible, appendectomy for complicated appendicitis should be attempted using a laparoscopic approach.
引用
收藏
页码:847 / 851
页数:5
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   THE EPIDEMIOLOGY OF APPENDICITIS AND APPENDECTOMY IN THE UNITED-STATES [J].
ADDISS, DG ;
SHAFFER, N ;
FOWLER, BS ;
TAUXE, RV .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1990, 132 (05) :910-925
[2]   Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendicectomy in Adults with Complicated Appendicitis: an Update of the Literature [J].
Athanasiou, Christos ;
Lockwood, Sonia ;
Markides, Georgios A. .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2017, 41 (12) :3083-3099
[3]   Laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis - An evaluation of postoperative factors [J].
Ball, CG ;
Kortbeek, JB ;
Kirkpatrick, AW ;
Mitchell, P .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2004, 18 (06) :969-973
[4]   Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a retrospective cohort study assessing outcomes and cost-effectiveness [J].
Biondi, Antonio ;
Di Stefano, Carla ;
Ferrara, Francesco ;
Bellia, Angelo ;
Vacante, Marco ;
Piazza, Luigi .
WORLD JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY SURGERY, 2016, 11
[5]  
BONANNI F, 1994, J AM COLL SURGEONS, V179, P273
[6]   A meta analysis of randomized controlled trials of laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy [J].
Chung, RS ;
Rowland, DY ;
Li, P ;
Diaz, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1999, 177 (03) :250-256
[7]   Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in adults and children: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [J].
Dai, Liping ;
Shuai, Jian .
UNITED EUROPEAN GASTROENTEROLOGY JOURNAL, 2017, 5 (04) :542-553
[8]  
Frazee RC, 1996, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V131, P509
[9]  
FRITTS LL, 1993, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V128, P521
[10]   Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic and open appendectomy [J].
Garbutt, JM ;
Soper, NJ ;
Shannon, WD ;
Botero, A ;
Littenberg, B .
SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY & ENDOSCOPY, 1999, 9 (01) :17-26