How do Practitioners Perceive the Relevance of Requirements Engineering Research? An Ongoing Study

被引：13

作者：

Franch, Xavier ^{[1
]}

Fernandez, Daniel Mendez ^{[2
]}

Oriol, Marc ^{[1
]}

Vogelsang, Andreas ^{[3
]}

Heldal, Rogardt ^{[4
]}

Knauss, Eric ^{[4
]}

Travassos, Guilherme Horta ^{[5
,6
]}

Carver, Jeffrey C. ^{[7
]}

Dieste, Oscar ^{[8
]}

Zimmermann, Thomas ^{[9
]}

机构：

[1] UPC, Barcelona, Spain

[2] Tech Univ Munich, Munich, Germany

[3] Berlin Inst Technol TU Berlin, Berlin, Germany

[4] Chalmers Univ Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden

[5] Fed Univ Rio de Janeiro COPPE, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil

[6] CNPq, Brasilia, DF, Brazil

[7] Univ Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487 USA

[8] Univ Politecn Madrid, Madrid, Spain

[9] Microsoft Res, New York, NY USA

来源：

2017 IEEE 25TH INTERNATIONAL REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING CONFERENCE (RE) | 2017年

关键词：

Requirements Engineering; Empirical Study; Survey; Online Questionnaire;

D O I：

10.1109/RE.2017.17

中图分类号：

TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];

学科分类号：

0812 ;

摘要：

The relevance of Requirements Engineering (RE) research to practitioners is a prerequisite for problem-driven research in the area and key for a long-term dissemination of research results to everyday practice. To understand better how industry practitioners perceive the practical relevance of RE research, we have initiated the RE-Pract project, an international collaboration conducting an empirical study. This project opts for a replication of previous work done in two different domains and relies on survey research. To this end, we have designed a survey to be sent to several hundred industry practitioners at various companies around the world and ask them to rate their perceived practical relevance of the research described in a sample of 418 RE papers published between 2010 and 2015 at the RE, ICSE, FSE, ESEC/FSE, ESEM and REFSQ conferences. In this paper, we summarize our research protocol and present the current status of our study and the planned future steps.

引用

页码：382 / 387

页数：6

共 13 条

[1] Ameller D., 2015, P 23 INT REQ ENG C R
[2] Beyond authorship: attribution, contribution, collaboration, and credit
Brand, Amy
Allen, Liz
Altman, Micah
Hlava, Marjorie
Scott, Jo
[J]. LEARNED PUBLISHING, 2015, 28 (02) : 151 - 155
[3] Carver J. C., 2016, P 10 INT S EMP SOFTW
[4] An empirical study of the complex relationships between requirements engineering processes and other processes that lead to payoffs in productivity, quality, and risk management
Damian, Daniela
Chisan, James
[J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 2006, 32 (07) : 433 - 453
[5] Fernandez D. Mendez, 2016, EMPIRICAL SOFTWARE E
[6] Fernandez D. Mendez, 2014, P 18 INT C EV ASS SO
[7] Practicing What We Preach
Ghaisas, Smita
[J]. IEEE SOFTWARE, 2014, 31 (01) : 88 - 92
[8] Requirements engineering and technology transfer: Obstacles, incentives and improvement agenda
Kaindl H.
Brinkkemper S.
Bubenko Jr. J.A.
Farbey B.
Greenspan S.J.
Heitmeyer C.L.
Do Prado Leite J.C.S.
Mead N.R.
Mylopoulos J.
Siddiqi J.
[J]. Requirements Engineering, 2002, 7 (3) : 113 - 123
[9] Lo D., 2015, P 10 JOINT M FDN SOF
[10] Mahaux M., 2013, P 21 INT C REQ ENG R

← 1 2 →