Non-response biases in surveys of schoolchildren: the case of the English Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) samples

被引:27
作者
Micklewright, John [1 ]
Schnepf, Sylke V. [2 ]
Skinner, Chris [3 ]
机构
[1] Inst Educ, Dept Quantitat Social Sci, London WC1H 0AL, England
[2] Univ Southampton, Southampton SO9 5NH, Hants, England
[3] Univ London London Sch Econ & Polit Sci, London WC2A 2AE, England
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
Bias; Data linkage; Non-response; Programme for International Student Assessment; (PISA); School survey; CAUTIONS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1467-985X.2012.01036.x
中图分类号
O1 [数学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
. We analyse response patterns to an important survey of schoolchildren, exploiting rich auxiliary information on respondents and non-respondents cognitive ability that is correlated both with response and the learning achievement that the survey aims to measure. The survey is the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), which sets response thresholds in an attempt to control the quality of data. We analyse the case of England for 2000, when response rates were deemed sufficiently high by the organizers of the survey to publish the results, and 2003, when response rates were a little lower and deemed of sufficient concern for the results not to be published. We construct weights that account for the pattern of non-response by using two methods: propensity scores and the generalized regression estimator. There is clear evidence of biases, but there is no indication that the slightly higher response rates in 2000 were associated with higher quality data. This underlines the danger of using response rate thresholds as a guide to quality of data.
引用
收藏
页码:915 / 938
页数:24
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [11] Department for Education and Skills, 2005, PISA 2003 SAMPL DES
  • [12] Fuller W. A., 2009, Sampling statistics
  • [13] Groves R., 1989, SURVEY ERRORS SURVEY
  • [14] The impact of nonresponse rates on nonresponse bias - A meta-analysis
    Groves, Robert M.
    Peytcheva, Emilia
    [J]. PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 2008, 72 (02) : 167 - 189
  • [15] Nonresponse rates and nonresponse bias in household surveys
    Groves, Robert M.
    [J]. PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 2006, 70 (05) : 646 - 675
  • [16] Kalton G., 2003, J. Off. Stat., V19, P81
  • [17] Demystifying double robustness: A comparison of alternative strategies for estimating a population mean from incomplete data
    Kang, Joseph D. Y.
    Schafer, Joseph L.
    [J]. STATISTICAL SCIENCE, 2007, 22 (04) : 523 - 539
  • [18] Using proxy measures and other correlates of survey outcomes to adjust for non-response: examples from multiple surveys
    Kreuter, F.
    Olson, K.
    Wagner, J.
    Yan, T.
    Ezzati-Rice, T. M.
    Casas-Cordero, C.
    Lemay, M.
    Peytchev, A.
    Groves, R. M.
    Raghunathan, T. E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY, 2010, 173 : 389 - 407
  • [19] Little RJ., 2002, Statistical Analysis with
  • [20] SURVEY NONRESPONSE ADJUSTMENTS FOR ESTIMATES OF MEANS
    LITTLE, RJA
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL STATISTICAL REVIEW, 1986, 54 (02) : 139 - 157