Intraregional model for end-stage liver disease score variation in liver transplantation: Disparity in our own backyard

被引:25
作者
Croome, Kristopher P. [1 ]
Lee, David D. [1 ]
Burns, Justin M. [1 ]
Keaveny, Andrew P. [1 ]
Taner, C. Burcin [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin Florida, Dept Transplant, 4500 San Pablo Rd, Jacksonville, FL 32224 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1002/lt.25021
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Variation in average Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score at liver transplantation (LT) by United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) regions is well documented. The present study aimed to investigate MELD variation at the interregional, intraregional, and intra-donation service area (DSA) levels. Patients undergoing LT between 2015 and 2016 were obtained from the UNOS standard analysis and research file. The distribution of allocation MELD score including median, skew, and kurtosis was examined for all transplant programs. Intraregional median allocation MELD varied significantly within all 11 UNOS regions. The largest variation between programs was seen in region 5 (MELD 24.0 versus 38.5) and region 3 (MELD 20.5 versus 32.0). Regions 1, 5, and 9 had the largest proportion of programs with a highly negative skewed MELD score (50%, 57%, and 57%, respectively), whereas regions 3, 6, 10, and 11 did not have any programs with a highly negative skew. MELD score distribution was also examined in programs located in the same DSA, where no barriers exist and theoretically no significant difference in allocation should be observed. The largest DSA variation in median allocation MELD score was seen in NYRT-OP1 LiveOnNY (MELD score variation 11), AZOB-OP1 Donor Network of Arizona (MELD score variation 11), MAOB-OP1 New England Organ Bank (MELD score variation 9), and TXGC-OP1 LifeGift Organ Donation Ctr (MELD score variation 9). In conclusion, the present study demonstrates that this MELD disparity is not only present at the interregional level but can be seen within regions and even within DSAs between programs located as close as several city blocks away. Although organ availability likely accounts for a component of this disparity, the present study suggests that transplant center behavior may also play a significant role. Liver Transplantation 24 488-496 2018 AASLD.
引用
收藏
页码:488 / 496
页数:9
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   Liver Transplantation With Older Donors: A Comparison With Younger Donors in a Context of Organ Shortage [J].
Barbier, Louise ;
Cesaretti, Manuela ;
Dondero, Federica ;
Cauchy, Francois ;
Khoy-Ear, Linda ;
Aoyagi, Takeshi ;
Weiss, Emmanuel ;
Roux, Olivier ;
Dokmak, Safi ;
Francoz, Claire ;
Paugam-, Catherine ;
Sepulveda, Ailton ;
Belghiti, Jacques ;
Durand, Francois ;
Soubrane, Olivier .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2016, 100 (11) :2410-2415
[2]   Actual Risk of Using Very Aged Donors for Unselected Liver Transplant Candidates A European Single-center Experience in the MELD Era [J].
Bertuzzo, Valentina Rosa ;
Cescon, Matteo ;
Odaldi, Federica ;
Di Laudo, Marco ;
Cucchetti, Alessandro ;
Ravaioli, Matteo ;
Del Gaudio, Massimo ;
Ercolani, Giorgio ;
D'Errico, Antonietta ;
Pinna, Antonio Daniele .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2017, 265 (02) :388-396
[3]   In a MELD-based economy, how can we fight off inflation? [J].
Biggins, Scott W. ;
Feng, Sandy .
LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2007, 13 (01) :2-4
[4]  
Bulmer MG., 1979, Principles of Statistics
[5]   Early Allograft Dysfunction Is Associated With Excess Resource Utilization After Liver Transplantation [J].
Croome, K. P. ;
Hernandez-Alejandro, R. ;
Chandok, N. .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2013, 45 (01) :259-264
[6]   Comparison of Longterm Outcomes and Quality of Life in Recipients of Donation After Cardiac Death Liver Grafts With a Propensity-Matched Cohort [J].
Croome, Kristopher P. ;
Lee, David D. ;
Perry, Dana K. ;
Burns, Justin M. ;
Nguyen, Justin H. ;
Keaveny, Andrew P. ;
Taner, C. Burcin .
LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2017, 23 (03) :342-351
[7]   Liver allocation and distribution: time for a change [J].
Deshpande, Ranjit ;
Hirose, Ryutaro ;
Mulligan, David .
CURRENT OPINION IN ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION, 2017, 22 (02) :162-168
[8]   The effect of the volume of procedures at transplantation centers on mortality after liver transplantation. [J].
Edwards, EB ;
Roberts, JP ;
McBride, MA ;
Schulak, JA ;
Hunsicker, LG .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 341 (27) :2049-2053
[9]   Characteristics associated with liver graft failure: The concept of a donor risk index [J].
Feng, S ;
Goodrich, NP ;
Bragg-Gresham, JL ;
Dykstra, DM ;
Punch, JD ;
DebRoy, MA ;
Greenstein, SM ;
Merion, RM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2006, 6 (04) :783-790
[10]   The Aggressive Phenotype Revisited: Utilization of Higher-Risk Liver Allografts [J].
Garonzik-Wang, J. M. ;
James, N. T. ;
Van Arendonk, K. J. ;
Gupta, N. ;
Orandi, B. J. ;
Hall, E. C. ;
Massie, A. B. ;
Montgomery, R. A. ;
Dagher, N. N. ;
Singer, A. L. ;
Cameron, A. M. ;
Segev, D. L. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2013, 13 (04) :936-942